Vegetated flows in their environmental context: A review

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering and Computational Mechanics

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-24

  Folkard, Andrew M ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hydraulics hydrodynamics; Reviews; River engineering

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXTS; FLOW RESISTANCE; FLUVIAL CHANNELS; HABITAT STRUCTURES; MEAN FLOW; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; PRIMARY CONTROL; RIVER ENGINEERING; SEDIMENT BUDGETS; SEMI-EMPIRICAL; VEGETATION PATCHES;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; HYDRODYNAMICS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; WATER QUALITY;

VEGETATION;

EID: 79958213436     PISSN: 17550777     EISSN: 17470785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/eacm.8.00006     Document Type: Review

References (164)

1. Ackerman JD and Okubo A (1993) Reduced mixing in a marine macrophyte canopy. Functional Ecology 7(3): 305-309.
2. Arcement GJ and Schneider VR (1989) Guide for Selecting Manning's Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains. United States Geological Survey, Washington DC, Water Supply Paper 2339.
3. Armanini A, Righetti M and Grisenti P (2005) Direct measurement of vegetation resistance in prototype scale. Journal of Hydraulic Research 43(5): 481-487.
4. Armitage PD, Blackburn JH, Winder JM and Wright JF (1994) Impact of vegetation management on macroinvertebrates in chalk streams. Aquatic Conservation - Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4(2): 95-104.
5. Baattrup-Pedersen A, Szoszkiewicz K, Nijboer R, O'Hare MT and Ferreira T (2006) Macrophyte communities in unimpacted European streams: variability in assemblage patterns, abundance and diversity. Hydrobiologia 566(1): 179-196.
6. Barnes HH (1967) Roughness Characteristics of Natural Channels. United States Geological Survey, Washington DC, Water Supply Paper 1849.
7. Barrat-Segretain MH (2001) Biomass allocation in three macrophyte species in relation to the disturbance level of their habitat. Freshwater Biology 46(7): 935-945.
8. Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (2005) Computational fluid dynamics modelling for environmental hydraulics. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 1-15.
9. Bennett SJ, Pirim T and Barkdoll BD (2002) Using simulated emergent vegetation to alter stream flow direction within a straight experimental channel. Geomorphology 44(1-2): 115-126.
10. Bovee KD and Milhous R (1978) Hydraulic Simulation in Instream Flow Studies: Theory and Techniques. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, Report FWS/OBS-78/33.
11. Brooker MP, Morris DL and Wilson CJ (1978) Plant-flow relationships in the River Wye catchment. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, 63-70. European Weed Research Society, Oxford.
12. Butcher RW (1933) Studies on the ecology of rivers. I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. Journal of Ecology 21(1): 58-91.
13. Carollo FG, Ferro V and Termini D (2002) Flow velocity measurements in vegetated channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 128(7): 664-673.
14. Champion PD and Tanner CC (2000) Seasonality of macrophytes and interaction with flow in a New Zealand lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 441(1): 1-12.
15. Chen CL (1976) Flow resistance in broad shallow grassed channels. Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE 102(3): 307-322.
16. Choi SU and Kang H (2006) Numerical investigations of mean flow and turbulence structures of partly-vegetated openchannel flows using the Reynolds stress model. Journal of Hydraulic Research 44(2): 203-217.
17. Chow VT (1959) Open Channel Hydraulics, international edn. McGraw Hill, London, UK.
18. Clarke SJ (2002) Vegetation growth in rivers: influences upon sediment and nutrient dynamics. Progress in Physical Geography 26(2): 159-172.
19. Cranston E and Darby EJ (2002) Ranunculus in Chalk Rivers Phase 2. UK Environment Agency, London, EA RandD Technical Report W1-042/TR, 2002.
20. Davis JA and Barmuta LA (1989) An ecologically useful classification of mean and near-bed flows in streams and rivers. Freshwater Biology 21(2): 271-282.
21. Dawson FH (1978) The seasonal effects of aquatic plant growth on the flow of water in a stream. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, 71-78. European Weed Research Society, Oxford.
22. Dawson FH (1979) Ranunculus calcareus and its Role in Lowland Streams. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, FBA Report 47.
23. Dawson FH and Robinson WN (1984) Submerged macrophytes and the hydraulic roughness of a lowland chalk stream. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung Limnologie 22(3): 1944-1948.
24. de Langre E (2008) Effects of wind on plants. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics 32: 141-162.
25. Duan JG, French RH and Miller J (2002) The lodging velocity for emergent aquatic plants in open channels. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(1): 255-263.
26. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2000) Directive 2000/60/EEC of the European Union and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2000, L327/1.
27. Fathi-Moghadam M and Kouwen N (1997) Nonrigid, nonsubmerged, vegetative roughness on floodplains. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 123(1): 51-57.
28. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (1998) Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, National Engineering Handbook: Part 653,
29. Feurer D, Bailly JS, Puech C, Le Coarer Y and Viau AA (2008) Very-high-resolution mapping of river-immersed topography by remote sensing. Progress in Physical Geography 32(4): 403-419.
30. Findlay S, Nieder W, Blair E and Fischer D (2006) Multi-scale controls on water quality effects of submerged aquatic vegetation in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Ecosystems 9(1): 84-96.
31. Finelli CM (2000) Velocity and concentration distributions in turbulent odor plumes in the presence of vegetation mimics: a flume study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 207: 297-309.
32. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics 32: 519-571.
33. Fisher K (1992) The Hydraulic Roughness of Vegetated Channels. Hydraulics Research Ltd, Wallingford, UK, Report SR 305.
34. Flamant A (1891) Mecanique Appliquée - Hydraulique. Béranger, Paris, France.
35. Ganguillet E and Kutter WR (1869) Versuch zur Aufstellung einer neuen allgemeinen Formel für die gleichförmige Bewegung des Wassers in Canälen und Flüssen. Zeitschrift des Oesterreichischen Ingenieur- und Architckten-Vereines. (Translated by Herring and Trautwine as: General formula for the uniform flow of water in rivers and other channels. Wiley, New York, 1893).
36. Gantes HP and Caro AS (2001) Environmental heterogeneity and spatial distribution of macrophytes in plain streams. Aquatic Botany 70(3): 225-236.
37. Gauckler P (1867) Etudes théoriques et pratiques sur l'ecoulement et le mouvement des eaux. Comptes Rendues de l'Académie des Sciences 64: 818-822.
38. Gesner F (1955) Hydrobotanik. I. Energiehaushalt. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany.
39. Ghisalberti M and Nepf HM (2002) Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(C2): 1-11.
40. Ghisalberti M and Nepf HM (2004) The limited growth of vegetated shear layers. Water Resources Research 40(7): article number W07502.
41. Ghisalberti M and Nepf HM (2006) The structure of the shear layer over rigid and flexible canopies. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 6(3): 277-301.
42. Gioia G and Bombardelli FA (2002) Scaling and similarity in rough channel flows. Physical Review Letters 88(1): article number 014501.
43. Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ and Nathan RJ (2004) Stream Hydrology: an Introduction for Ecologists, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, USA.
44. Gourlay M.R (1970) Discussion of: Flow resistance in vegetated channels, by Kouwen, N, Unny, TE and Hill, HM. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division ASCE 96(IR3): 351-357.
45. Granger RA (1995) Fluid Mechanics. Dover, New York, USA.
46. Green JC (2005a) Modelling channel resistance in vegetated streams: review and development of new theory. Hydrological Processes 19(6): 1245-1259.
47. Green JC (2005b) Comparison of blockage factors in modelling the resistance of channels containing submerged macrophytes. River Research and Applications 21(6): 671-686.
48. Green JC (2006) Effect of macrophyte spatial variability on channel resistance. Advances in Water Resources 29(3): 426-438.
49. Green JC and Richards KS (1998) Investigation into the validity of resistance-discharge relationships for trailing aquatic plants. In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, vol. 1 (Wheater H and Kirby C (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 413-420.
50. Gurnell AM and Midgley P (1994) Aquatic weed growth and flow resistance - influence on the relationship between discharge and stage over a 25 year river gauging station record. Hydrological Processes 8(1): 63-73.
51. Gurnell AM, van Oosterhout MP, de Vlieger B and Goodson JM (2006) Reach-scale interactions between aquatic plants and physical habitat: River Frome, Dorset. River Research and Applications 22(6): 667-680.
52. Haslam SM (1978) River Plants: The Macrophytic Vegetation of Watercourses. CUP, Cambridge, UK.
53. Hearne JW and Armitage PD (1993) Implications of the annual macrophyte growth-cycle on habitat in rivers. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 8(4): 313-322.
54. Heritage GL and Milan DJ (2009) Terrestrial laser scanning of grain roughness in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 113(2): 1-2, 4-11.
55. Hilton J, O'Hare MT, Bowes MJ and Jones JI (2006) How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers. Science of the Total Environment 365(1-3): 66-83.
56. Hoffman AL, Olden JD, Monroe JB, et al. (2006) Current velocity and habitat patchiness shape stream herbivore movement. Oikos 115(2): 358-368.
57. Horvath TG (2004) Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream. Aquatic Botany 78(1): 27-36.
58. House WA, Duplat D, Denison FH, et al. (2001) The role of macrophytes in the retention of phosphorus in the River Thames, England. Chemistry and Ecology 17(4): 271-291.
59. Hydraulics Research Wallingford (1992) The Hydraulic Roughness of Vegetated Channels. HRW, Wallingford, Report SR 305.
60. Huai WX, Han J, Zeng YH, An X and Qian ZD (2009) Velocity distribution of flow with submerged flexible vegetations based on mixing-length approach. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, English Edition 30(3): 343-351.
61. James CS and Makoa MJ (2006) Conveyance estimation for channels with emergent vegetation boundaries. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management 159(4): 235-243.
62. James CS, Jordanova AA and Nicolson CR (2002) Flume experiments and modelling of flow-sediment-vegetation interactions. In Structure, Function and Management Implications of Fluvial Sedimentary Systems (Dyer FJ, Thoms MC and Olley JM (eds)). IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp. 3-9.
63. Jordanova AA and James CS (2003) Experimental study of bed load transport through emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 129(6): 474-478.
64. Jordanova AA, James CS and Birkhead AL (2006) Practical estimation of flow resistance through emergent vegetation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management 159(3): 173-181.
65. Katul G, Wiberg P, Albertson J and Hornberger G (2002) A mixing layer theory for flow resistance in shallow streams. Water Resources Research 38(11): article number 1250.
66. Kemp JL, Harper DM and Crosa GA (2000) The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers. Ecological Engineering 16(1): 17-29.
67. King HW (1918) Handbook of Hydraulics for the Solution of Hydraulic Problems, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
68. Kirby JT, Durrans SR, Pitt R and Johnson D (2005) Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131(1): 65-68.
69. Kouwen N (1992) Modern approach to design of grassed channels. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 118(5): 733-743.
70. Kouwen N and Unny TE (1973) Flexible roughnesses in open channels. Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE 99(HY5): 713-728.
71. Kouwen N and Li R-M (1980) Biomechanics of vegetative channel linings. Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE 106(HY6): 1085-1103.
72. Kouwen N, Unny TE and Hill HM (1969) Flow retardance in vegetated channels. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division ASCE 95(IR2): 329-342.
73. Lane SN and Ferguson RI (2005) Modelling reach-scale alluvial flows. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 217-270.
74. Lane SN, Hardy RJ, Ferguson RI and Parsons DR (2005) A framework for model verification and validation of CFD schemes in natural open channel flows. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 169-192.
75. Lane SN, Hardy RJ, Elliott L and Ingham DB (2002) High resolution numerical modelling of three-dimensional flow over complex river bed topography. Hydrological Processes 16(11): 2261-2272.
76. Larsen T, Frier JO and Vestergaard K (1990) Discharge/stage relations in vegetated Danish streams. Proceedings of International Conference on River Flood Hydraulics (White WR (ed.)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 187-195.
77. Leclerc M (2005) Ecohydraulics: a new interdisciplinary frontier for CFD. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 429-460.
78. Leonard LA and Croft AL (2006) The effect of standing biomass on flow velocity and turbulence in Spartina alterniflora canopies. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 69(3-4): 325-336.
79. Lopez F and Garcia MH (2001) Mean flow and turbulent structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 127(5): 392-402.
80. Luhar M, Rominger J and Nepf HM (2008) Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 8(5-6): 423-439.
81. Luo S, Gan T and Chew Y (1996) Uniform flow past one (or two in tandem) finite length circular cylinder(s). Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 59(1): 69-93.
82. Mainstone CP, Davis RD, House A and Parr W (1996) A Review of Methods for Assessing and Controlling Non-point Sources of Phosphorus. National Rivers Authority, London, NRA RandD Note.
83. Manning R (1890) On the flow of water in open channels and pipes. Transactions of the Institution of Civil Engineers of Ireland 20: 161-207.
84. Mertes LAK (2002) Remote sensing of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47(4): 799-816.
85. Morris HM (1955) A new concept of flow in rough conduits. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 120: 373-398.
86. Mutz M (2000) Influences of woody debris on flow patterns and channel morphology in a low energy, sand-bed stream reach. International Review of Hydrobiology 85(1): 107-121.
87. Naden P, Rameshwaran P, Mountford O and Robertson C (2006) The influence of macrophyte growth, typical of eutrophic conditions, on river flow velocities and turbulence production. Hydrological Processes 20(18): 3915-3938.
88. Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Hiwasaki L, et al. (2007) The Science of Flow-Ecology Relationships: Clarifying Key Terms and Concepts. UNESCO, Paris, International Hydrological Programme Paper.
89. Naot D, Nezu I and Nakagawa H (1996) Hydrodynamic behavior of partly vegetated open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 122(11): 625-633.
90. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research 35(2): 479-489.
91. Nepf HM and Vivoni E (2000) Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(C12): 28547-28557.
92. Nepf HM, Ghisalberti M, White B and Murphy E (2007) Retention time and dispersion associated with submerged aquatic canopies. Water Resources Research 43(4): article number W04422.
93. Nezu I and Onitsuka K (2001) Turbulent structures in partly vegetated open-channel flows with LDA and PIV measurements. Journal of Hydraulic Research 39(6): 629-642.
94. Nicholas AP (2005) Roughness parameterisation in CFD modelling of gravel-bed rivers. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 329-356.
95. Nikora VI (2009) Hydrodynamics of aquatic ecosystems: an interface between ecology, biomechanics and environmental fluid mechanics. River Research and Applications, available online, doi: 10.1002/rra.1291.
96. Nikora VI, Goring DG, McEwan I and Griffiths G (2001) Spatially-averaged open-channel flow over a rough bed. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 127(2): 123-133.
97. Nikora VI, McEwan I, McLean S, et al. (2007) Doubleaveraging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 133(8): 873-883.
98. Nimmo Smith WAM (2008) A submersible three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry system for flow visualization in the coast ocean. Limnology and Oceanography Methods 6: 96-104.
99. O'Hare MT and Murphy KJ (1999) Invertebrate hydraulic microhabitat and community structure in Callitriche stagnalis Scop. patches. Hydrobiologia 415(1): 169-176.
100. O'Hare MT, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Nijboer RC, Szoszkiewicz K and Ferreira T (2006) Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat. Hydrobiologia 566(1): 197-210.
101. O'Hare MT, Stillman RA, McDonnell J and Wood L (2007) The effects of mute swan grazing on a keystone macrophyte. Freshwater Biology 52(12): 2463-2475.
102. Oldham CE and Sturman JJ (2001) The effect of emergent vegetation on convective flushing in shallow wetlands: scaling and experiments. Limnology and Oceanography 46(6): 1486-1493.
103. Olsen NRB and Stoksteth S (1995) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of water flow in a river with large bed roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Research 33(4): 571-581.
104. Pedersen TCM, Baattrup-Pedersen A and Madsen TV (2006) Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 51(1): 161-179.
105. Pepper AT (1970) Investigation of Vegetation and Bend Flow Retardation of a Stretch of the River Ousel. BSc Dissertation. National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe.
106. Petryk S and Bosmajian G (1975) Analysis of flow through vegetation. Journal of the Hydraulics Division ASCE 101(HY7): 871-884.
107. Pitlo RH (1986) Towards a larger flow capacity of vegetated channels. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, 245-250. European Weed Research Society/ Association of Applied Biologists, Oxford.
108. Pitlo RH and Dawson FH (1990) Flow resistance of aquatic weeds. In Aquatic Weeds: the Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation (Pieterse AH and Murphy KJ. (eds)). OUP, Oxford, pp. 74-84.
109. Plew DR, Cooper GG and Callaghan FM (2008) Turbulenceinduced forces in a freshwater macrophyte canopy. Water Resources Research 44(2): article number W02414.
110. Pluntke T and Kozerski HP (2003) Particle trapping on leaves and on the bottom in simulated submerged plant stands. Hydrobiologia 506(1-3): 575-581.
111. Powell KEC (1978) Weed growth - a factor in channel roughness. In Hydrometry, Principles and Practice (Herschy RW (ed.)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 327-352.
112. Py C, de Langre E and Moulia B (2006) A frequency lock-in mechanism in the interaction between wind and crop canopies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 568: 425-449.
113. Raudkivi AJ (1990) Loose Boundary Hydraulics, 3rd edn. Pergamon, New York.
114. Raupach M and Shaw R (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary Layer Meteorology 22(1): 79-90.
115. Raupach M, Finnigan J and Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary Layer Meteorology 78(3-4): 351-382.
116. Ree WO (1949) Hydraulic characteristics of vegetation for vegetated motorways. Agricultural Engineering 30: 184-187.
117. Ree WO and Palmer VJ (1949) Flow of Water in Channels Protected by Vegetative Linings. Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. Technical Bulletin No. 967.
118. Rhee DS, Woo H, Kwon BA and Ahn HK (2008) Hydraulic resistance of some selected vegetation in open channel flows. River Research and Applications 24(5): 673-687.
119. Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, de Ruiter PC and van de Koppel J (2004) Self-organised patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305: 1926-1929.
120. Righetti M and Armanini A (2002) Flow resistance in open channel flows with sparsely distributed bushes. Journal of Hydrology 269(1-2): 55-64.
121. River Restoration Centre (2002) Manual of River Restoration Techniques. River Restoration Centre, Cranfield, UK.
122. Rodrigues S, Breheret JG, Macaire JJ, Greulich S and Villar M (2007) In-channel woody vegetation controls on sedimentary processes and the sedimentary record within alluvial environments: a modern example of an anabranch of the River Loire, France. Sedimentology 54(1): 223-242.
123. Sand Jensen K (1998) Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 39(4): 663-679.
124. Sand Jensen K (2005) Aquatic plants are open flexible structures - a reply to Sukhodolov. Freshwater Biology 50(1): 196-198.
125. Sand Jensen K (2008) Drag forces on common plant species in temperate streams: consequences of morphology, velocity and biomass. Hydrobiologia 610(1): 307-319.
126. Sand Jensen K and Jacobsen D (2002) Herbivory and growth in terrestrial and aquatic populations of amphibious stream plants. Freshwater Biology 47(8): 1475-1487.
127. Sand Jensen K and Madsen TV (1992) Patch dynamics of the stream macrophyte, Callitriche cophocarpa. Freshwater Biology 27(2): 277-282.
128. Sand Jensen K and Mebus JR (1996) Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76(1): 169-180.
129. Sand Jensen K and Pedersen O (1999) Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte patches in streams. Freshwater Biology 42(2): 315-328.
130. Sand Jensen K and Pedersen ML (2008) Streamlining of plant patches in streams. Freshwater Biology 53(4): 714-726.
131. Sand Jensen K, Jeppesen E, Nielsen K, et al. (1989) Growth of macrophytes and ecosystem consequences in a lowland Danish stream. Freshwater Biology 22(1): 15-32.
132. Sand Jensen K, Riis T, Vestergaard O and Larsen SE (2000) Macrophyte decline in Danish lakes and streams over the past 100 years. Journal of Ecology 88(6): 1030-1040.
133. Schneider S and Melzer A (2004) Sediment and water nutrient characteristics in patches of submerged macrophytes in running waters. Hydrobiologia 527(1): 195-207.
134. Schulz M and Kohler J (2006) A simple model of phosphorus retention evoked by submerged macrophytes in lowland rivers. Hydrobiologia 563(1): 521-525.
135. Schulz M, Kozerski HP, Pluntke T and Rinke K (2003) The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany). Water Research 37(3): 569-578.
136. Schutten J and Davy AJ (2000) Predicting the hydraulic forces on submerged macrophytes from current velocity, biomass and morphology. Oecologia 123(4): 445-452.
137. Schutten J, Dainty J and Davy AJ (2005) Root anchorage and its significance for submerged plants in shallow lakes. Journal of Ecology 93(3): 556-571.
138. Serra T, Fernando HJS and Rodriguez RV (2004) Effects of emergent vegetation on lateral diffusion in wetlands. Water Research 38(1): 139-147.
139. Sharpe RG and James CS (2006) Deposition of sediment from suspension in emergent vegetation. Water South Africa 32(2): 211-218.
140. Smith RJ, Hancock NH and Ruffin JL (1990) Flood flow through tall vegetation. Agricultural Water Management 18(4): 317-332.
141. Statzner B, Lamouroux N, Nikora VI and Sagnes P (2006) The debate about drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes: comparing results obtained by three recently discussed approaches. Freshwater Biology 51(11): 2173-2183.
142. Sukhodolov A (2005) Comment on drag and reconfiguration of macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 50(1): 194-195.
143. Suren AM, Smart GM, Smith RA and Brown SLR (2000) Drag coefficients of stream bryophytes: experimental determinations and ecological significance. Freshwater Biology 45(3): 309-317.
144. Tsihrintzis VA (2001) Variation of roughness coefficients for unsubmerged and submerged vegetation - Discussion. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 127(3): 241-244.
145. Turner AK and Chanmeesri N (1984) Shallow flow of water through non-submerged vegetation. Agricultural Water Management 8(4): 375-385.
146. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (1947) Handbook of Channel Design for Soil and Water Conservation. USDA, Washington DC, Soil Conservation Service Report TP-61.
147. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR and Cushing CE (1980) River continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37(1): 130-137.
148. Velasco D, Bateman A and Medina V (2008) A new integrated, hydro-mechanical model applied to flexible vegetation in riverbeds. Journal of Hydraulic Research 46(5): 579-597.
149. Watanabe K, Nagy HM and Noguchi H (2002) Flow structure and bed-load transport in vegetation flow. Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Asia/Pacific Division of the International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research 214-218. World Scientific Publishing Company.
150. Watson D (1987) Hydraulic effects of aquatic weeds in UK rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 1(3): 211-227.
151. Wharton G, Cotton JA, Wotton RS, et al. (2006) Macrophytes and suspension-feeding invertebrates modify flows and fine sediments in the Frome and Piddle catchments, Dorset (UK). Journal of Hydrology 330(1-2): 171-184.
152. Wilcock RJ and Nagels JW (2001) Effects of aquatic macrophytes on physico-chemical conditions of three contrasting lowland streams: a consequence of diffuse pollution from agriculture? Water Science and Technology 43(5): 163-168.
153. Wilcock R, Champion P, Nagels J and Crocker G (1999) The influence of aquatic macrophytes on the hydraulic and physicochemical properties of a New Zealand lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 416(1): 203-214.
154. Wilcock RJ, Scarsbrook MR, Costley KJ and Nagels JW (2002) Controlled release experiments to determine the effects of shade and plants on nutrient retention in a lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 485(1-3): 153-162.
155. Wilson CAME (2007) Flow resistance models for flexible submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydrology 342(3-4): 213-222.
156. Wilson CAME and Horritt M (2002) Measuring the flow resistance of submerged grass. Hydrological Processes 16(13): 2589-2598.
157. Wilson CAME, Stoesser T, Bates P and Bateman Pinzen A (2003) Open channel flow through different forms of submerged flexible vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 129(11): 847-853.
158. Wilson CAME, Stoesser T and Bates PD (2005) Modelling of open channel flow through vegetation. In Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Bates PD, Lane SN and Ferguson RI (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, pp. 395-428.
159. Wilson NR and Shaw RH (1977) Higher-order closure model for canopy flow. Journal of Applied Meteorology 16(11): 1197-1205.
160. Wintle BC and Kirkpatrick JB (2007) The response of riparian vegetation to flood-maintained habitat heterogeneity. Austral Ecology 32(5): 592-599.
161. Wood PJ and Armitage PD (1999) Sediment deposition in a small lowland stream - Management implications. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 15(1-3): 199-210.
162. Wu FC, Shen HW and Chou YJ (1999) Variation of roughness coefficients for unsubmerged and submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE 125(9): 934-942.
163. Yen BC (1992) Hydraulic resistance in open channels. In Channel Flow Resistance: Centennial of Manning's Formula (Yen BC (ed.)). Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, pp. 1-135.
164. Zukauskas A (1987) Heat transfer from tubes in cross-flow. Advances in Heat Transfer 18: 87-159.