Augmentation of pedicle screw stability with calcium sulfate cement in osteoporotic sheep: Biomechanical and screw-bone interfacial evaluation

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 235-241

  Liu, Da ^a   Lei, Wei ^a   Wu, Zi Xiang ^a   Gao, Ming Xuan ^a   Wan, Shi Yong ^a   Fu, Suo Chao ^a   Shi, Lei ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

biomechanics; calcium sulfate cement; in vivo; micro CT; osteoporosis; pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SULFATE; CALCIUM SULFATE CEMENT; CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADHESION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; OVARIECTOMY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP; VERTEBRA BODY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; BONE SCREWS; CALCIUM SULFATE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FEMALE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; OSTEOPOROSIS; SHEEP;

EID: 79958207834     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ecf88a     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gains RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000; 82-A:1458-1476.
2. Maciejczak A, Barnas P, Dudziak P, et al. Posterior keyhole corpectomy with percutaneous pedicle screw stabilization in the surgical management of lumbar burst fractures. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60:232-241; discussion 241-242.
3. Hee HT, Yu ZR, Wong HK. Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32: 1533-1542.
4. Halverson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, et al. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 1994;19:2415-2420. (Pubitemid 24347176)
5. Mclain RF, McKinley TO, Yerby SA, et al. The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability. A synthetic model. Spine. 1997;22:1454-1460. (Pubitemid 28073997)
6. Sarzier JS, Evans AJ, Cahill DW. Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:309-312. (Pubitemid 34245653)
7. Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R, et al. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine. 2007;32:1077-1083. (Pubitemid 46685984)
8. Leung KS, Siu WS, Li SF, et al. An in vitro optimized injectable calcium phosphate cement for augmenting screw fixation in osteopenic goats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;78: 153-160.
9. Hashemi A, Bednar D, Ziada S. Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: an experimental study. Spine J. 2009;9:404-410.
10. Yi X, Wang Y, Lu H, et al. Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium sulfate cement: an in vivo study. Spine. 2008;33:2503-2509.
11. Takigawa T, Tanaka M, Konishi H, et al. Comparative biomecha-nical analysis of an improved novel pedicle screw with sheath and bone cement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:462-467. (Pubitemid 47357505)
12. Watson JT. The use of an injectable bone graft substitute in tibial metaphyseal fractures. Orthopedics. 2004;27:103-107.
13. Urban RM, Turner TM, Hall DJ, et al. Effect of altered crystalline structure and increased initial compressive strength of calcium sulfate bone graft substitute pellets on new bone formation. Orthopedics. 2004;27:s113-s118. (Pubitemid 38159809)
14. Rohmiller MT, Schwalm D, Glattes RC, et al. Evaluation of calcium sulfate paste for augmentation of lumbar pedicle screw pullout strength. Spine J. 2002;2:255-260.
15. Derincek A, Wu C, Mehbod A, et al. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:286-291. (Pubitemid 44284128)
16. Wu ZX, Lei W, Hu YY, et al. Effect of ovariectomy on BMD, micro-architecture and biomechanics of cortical and cancellous bones in a sheep model. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:1112-1118.
17. Reitman CA, Nguyen L, Fogel GR. Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:306-311.
18. Kiner DW, Wybo CD, Sterba W, et al. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation. Spine. 2008;33:2618-2622.
19. Fransen P. Increasing pedicle screw anchoring in the osteoporotic spine by cement injection through the implant. Technical note and report of three cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:366-369. (Pubitemid 47480467)
20. Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, et al. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1462-1469.
21. Pfeifer BA, Krag MH, Johnson C. Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation. A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate, milled bone, and matchstick bone reconstruction. Spine. 1994;19:350-353. (Pubitemid 24071120)
22. Konno S, Olmarker K, Byrod G, et al. The European Spine Society AcroMed Prize 1994. Acute thermal nerve root injury. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:299-302.
23. Wilkes RA, Mackinnon JG, Thomas WG. Neurological deterioration after cement injection into a vertebral body. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:155-163.
24. Sidqui M, Collin P, Vitte C, et al. Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of isolated osteoclasts on calcium sulphate hemihydrate. Biomaterials. 1995;16:1327-1332.
25. Peltier LF. The use of plaster of Paris to fill large defects in bone: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;1:3-5.
26. Turner TM, Urban RM, Gitelis S, et al. Resorption evaluation of a large bolus of calcium sulfate in a canine medullary defect. Orthopedics. 2003;26(5 suppl):s577-s579. (Pubitemid 36626259)