Towards a modified consumer haptic device for robotic-assisted fine-motor repetitive motion training

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 546-551

  Palsbo, Susan E ^a   Marr, Deborah ^b   Streng, Taylor ^c   Bay, Brian K ^c   Norblad, A Walter ^d  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Oregon State University   (United States)

^d Lunar Logic LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

handwriting; motor processes; Rehabilitation; robotics; sensory and motor testing; telerehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE;

COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; CURRICULUM; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; PILOT PROJECTS; ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79958202222     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.532287     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Braun C, Heinz U, Schweizer R, Wiech K, Birbaumer N, Topka H. Dynamic organization of the somatosensory cortex induced by motor activity. Brain 2001;124:2259-2267 (Pubitemid 33055369)
2. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59-68
3. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:1117-1123 (Pubitemid 28095925)
4. Graziano MS, Gross CG. Spatial maps for the control of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998;8:195-201 (Pubitemid 28247800)
5. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 1995;18:314-320
6. Johnson-Frey SH. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:71-78 (Pubitemid 38169478)
7. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. [Letter]. Nature 1995;377:155-158
8. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Miller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-628 (Pubitemid 29269642)
9. Maravita A, Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:79-86 (Pubitemid 38169479)
10. Obayashi S, Suhara T, Nagai Y, Maeda, J, Hihara S, Iriki A. Macaque prefrontal activity associated with extensive tool use. Neuroreport 2002;13:2349-2354 (Pubitemid 36044457)
11. Xu T, Yu X, Perlik AJ, Tobin WF, Zweig JA, Tennant K, Jones T, Zuo Y. Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories. Nature 2009; 462:915-919
12. Aisen, ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe B. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997;54:443-446 (Pubitemid 27172864)
13. Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, Ohlhoff J, Macclellan L, Meister C, Whitall J, Macko R, Bever C, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42: 683-692
14. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006;3:12. (online publication) doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-12 (Pubitemid 44252716)
15. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala R, Cramer S. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008;131(Part 2):425-437 (Pubitemid 351197615)
16. Cook AM, Meng MQH, Gu JJ, Howery K. Development of a robotic device for facilitating learning by children who have severe disabilities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2002;10:178-187 (Pubitemid 35462931)
17. Fasoli S, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Hogan N, Krebs HI, Stein J. Upper limb robotic therapy for children with hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:929-936
18. Preminger F, Weiss PL, Weintraub N. Predicting occupational performance: handwriting versus keyboarding. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58:193-201 (Pubitemid 40340468)
19. Brewer N, Cunningham S, White J. A computerized procedure for teaching letter formation skills to mentally retarded individuals. J Educ Technol Syst 1990;18:185-190
20. Lally M. Computer-assisted handwriting instruction and visual/kinaesthetic feedback processes. Appl Res Ment Retard 1982;3:397-405
21. Popescu VG, Burdea GC, Bouzit M, Hentz VR. A virtualreality- based telerehabilitation system with force feedback. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2000;4:45-51 (Pubitemid 30583140)
22. Berninger VW. Highlights of programmatic, interdisciplinary research on writing. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2009;24:69-80
23. Bluteau J, Coquillart S, Payan Y, Gentaz E. Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories. PLoS One 2008;3:e1775
24. Graham S, Harris KR. Almost 30 years of writing research: making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2009;24:58-68
25. Kim Y, Duric Z, Gerber LH, Palsbo AR, Palsbo SE.Teaching letter writing using a programmable haptic device interface for children with handwriting difficulties. Presented at the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. Lafayette, LA 2009
26. Olsen JZ. Handwriting without tears. 5th ed. Potomac, MD; 1999
27. Marr D, Dimeo SB. Outcomes associated with a summer handwriting course for elementary students. Am J Occup Ther 2006;60:10-15 (Pubitemid 43341524)
28. Amundson SJ. Evaluation tool of children's handwriting. 1995; Homer, AK: OT KIDS 1995
29. Beery KE, Beery NA. The Beery-Butenica development test of visual-motor integration; administrative, scoring and teaching manual. 5th ed. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc. 2006
30. Parks R, Cintas HL, Chaffin MC, Gerber L. Brief assessment of motor function: content validity and reliability of the fine motor scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 2007;19:315-325 (Pubitemid 351339643)
31. Marr D, Palsbo SE. Handwriting tool reliability: the pros and cons of selected handwriting instruments. OT Practice. 2010;15:15-18
32. Milone M. Test of handwriting skills-revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 2007
33. Olsen JZ, Knapton EF. The print tool. 2nd ed. Cabin John, MD: Handwriting Without Tears; 2006
34. Rosenblum S, Chevion D, Weiss P. Using data visualization and signal processing to characterize the handwriting process. Pediatric Rehabil 2006;9:404-417 (Pubitemid 44581999)
35. Rosenblum S, Parush S, Weiss P. Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and non-proficient handwriters. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:129-138 (Pubitemid 39256406)