Cultivation of GMO in Germany: Support of monitoring and coexistence issues by WebGIS technology

Environmental Sciences Europe

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Kleppin, Lukas ^a   Schmidt, Gunther ^a   Schröder, Winfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VECHTA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79958187260     PISSN: 21904707     EISSN: 21904715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2190-4715-23-4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Pickardt T, de Kathen A: Gentechnisch veränderte Pflanzen mit neuen oder verbesserten Qualitäts-und Nutzungseigenschaften: Futtermittel und rohstoffliefernde Nutzpflanzen, Pflanzen zur Bodensanierung und Zierpflanzen BioTechConsult. Berlin; 2004, 1-107.
2. Squire GR, Hawes C, Begg GH, Young MW: Cumulative impact of GM herbicide tolerant cropping on arable plants assessed through speciesbased and functional taxonomies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2008, 16:85-94.
3. Wünn J: Landwirtschaft und Ernährung: Was bringen die neuen Entwicklungen für Bauern und Verbraucher? In Pflanzenbiotechnologie in der Schweiz. Ein Jahr nach der"Gentechfrei-Initiative". Bericht zur Fachtagung des Zürich-Basel Plant Science Center Edited by: Kohler S, Maranta A, Sautter Ch. Zürich 2007, 6-9.
4. James C: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2009 - The first fourteen years, 1996 to 2009. ISAAA Executive Summary, Brief No. 41. Ithaca, NY [http://www.isaaa.org].
5. EC: EU Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the council 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EE. 2001, L106:1-38.
6. Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP: Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. PNAS 2001, 98:11937-11942. (Pubitemid 32959805)
7. EFSA-Q-2003-005: Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed (Question No EFSA-Q-2003-005)., Adopted on 24 September 2004, updated on 7 December 2005, final edited version of 28 April 2006, May 2006.
8. Chapman MA, Burke JM: Letting the gene out of the bottle: The population genetics of genetically midified crops. New Phytologist 2006, 170:429-443.
9. Devaux C, Lavigne C, Austerlitz F, Klein EK: Modelling and estimating pollen movement in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) at the landscape scale using genetic markers. Mol Ecol 2007, 16:487-499. (Pubitemid 46161075)
10. Spök A, Hofer H, Lehner P, Valenta R, Stirn S, Gaugitsch H: Risk assessment of GMO products in the European Union. Toxicity assessment, allergenicity assessment and substantial equivalence in practice and proposals for improvement and standardisation. Wien 2005, [Berichte, BE-253].
11. Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrasi G, Ripandelli: An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 2008, 164:853-880.
12. Züghart W: Long-term and large-scale effects of genetically modified organisms require specific environmental monitoring designs. In Implications of GM-Crop Cultivation at Large Spatial Scales. Edited by: Breckling B, Reuter H, Verhoeven R. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 2008:81-85, [Theorie in der Ökologie 14].
13. Beckie HJ, Warwick SI, Nair H, Seguin-Swartz G: Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Ecol Appl 2003, 13:1276-1294. (Pubitemid 37546279)
14. Knispel AL, Mclachlan SM, Van Acker RC, Friesen LF: Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Sci 2008, 56:72-80.
15. Dively GP, Rose R, Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Calvin DD, Russo JM, Anderson PL: Effects on monarch butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1ab-expressing corn during anthesis. Environ Entomol 2004, 33:116-1125.
16. Lang A, Vojtech E: The effects of pollen consumption of transgenic Bt maize on the common swallowtail, Papilio machaon L. (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Basic Appl Ecol 2006, 7:296-306. (Pubitemid 43832184)
17. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME: Transgenic pollen harm monarch larvae. Nature 1999, 399:214. (Pubitemid 29246442)
18. Graef F: Agro-environmental effects due to altered cultivation practices with genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape and implications for monitoring. A review. Agronom Sustain Dev 2009, 29:31-42.
19. Lefol E, Fleury A, Darmency H: Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. II. Hybridization between oilseed rape and the wild hoary mustard. Sex Plant Reprod 1996, 9:189-196. (Pubitemid 26311862)
20. Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT: Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 2001, 296:2386-2388. (Pubitemid 34734211)
21. Graef F, Stachow U, Werner A, Schütte G: Agricultural practice changes with cultivating genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape. Agricult Syst 2007, 94:111-118. (Pubitemid 46498473)
22. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure): Beobachtung ökologischer Wirkungen gentechnisch veränderten Organismen - Gentechnisch veränderte Pflanzen - Grundlagen und Strategie VDI 4330, Blatt 1. Düsseldorf; 2006.
23. Reuter H, Verhoeven R, Middelhoff U, Breckling B: Information system for the monitoring of genetically modified organisms (GMO) - ISMO. J Verbr Lebensm 2006, 1:89-91. (Pubitemid 44951569)
24. Reuter H, Middelhoff U, Graef F, Verhoeven R, Batz T, Weis M, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Breckling B: Information system for monitoring environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2010 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0334-y].
25. Züghart W, Benzler A, Berhorn F, Sukopp U, Graef F: Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation. Euphytica 2008, 164:845-852.
26. Aden C, Schmidt G, Schröder W: Ein webbasiertes Geografisches Informationssystem für das Monitoring gentechnisch veränderter Organismen. In GVO-Monitoring vor der Umsetzung. Bonn Edited by: Breckling B, Dolek M, Lang A, Reuter H, Verhoeven R 2007, 97-112, [Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Series Editor): Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt, 49].
27. Schmidt G, Schröder W: Auswahl repräsentativer Standorte zur Modellierung der Ausbreitung von gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen in Nord-Deutschland. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 2008, 20:9-23.
28. Breckling B, Reuter H, Middelhoff U, Glemnitz M, Wurbs A, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Windhorst W: Risk indication of genetically modified organisms (GMO). Modelling environmental exposure and dispersal across different scales. Oilseed rape in Northern Germany as an integrated case study. Ecol Ind 2009.
29. Spath D, Günther J: Open Source Software - Strukturwandel oder Strohfeuer? - Eine empirische Studie zu Trends und Entwicklungen zum Einsatz von Open Source Software in der öffentlichen Verwaltung und IT-Unternehmen in Deutschland [http://www.iao.fraunhofer.de/d/oss-studie.pdf].
30. GNU General Public License Versions. [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ gpl-license.php].
31. Williams S: Free as in Freedom. Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software Cambridge: O'Reilly, Sebastopol; 2002.
32. INSPIRE Directive 2007/2/EC. [http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/].
33. Umweltportal Deutschland-PortalU. [http://portalu.de].
34. Adams T, Biakowski C, Christl A, Emde A, Thelen B, Trakas A: Praxishandbuch WebGIS mit Freier Software. Architektur, Beschreibung, Technik und Beispiele mit den Open Source Projekten: UMN MapServer, AVeiN!, PostgreSQL/Post-GIS, Mapbender. CCGIS GbR/terrestris GbR/Geo-Consortium. Bonn 2004.
35. GMO location register of the BVL. [http://apps2.bvl.bund.de/stareg-web/ showflaechen. do].
36. EC: EU Directive 2004/204/EC: Commission Decision of 23 February 2004 laying down detailed arrangements for the operation of the registers for recording information on genetic modifications in GMOs, provided for in Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C (2004) 540) 2004, L65:20-22.
37. Vaasen A, Gathmann A, Storch J, Bartsch D: Public GMO location register in Germany 2008 - a continuously improved information platform. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2008, 29-31.
38. Keil M, Kiefl R, Strunz G: CORINE Land Cover 2000 - Germany. Final report. Project period: 1 May 2001-31 December 2004. German Remote Sensing Data Center Oberpfaffenhofen; 2005.
39. Meynen E, Schmithüsen J, Gellert J, Neef E, Müller-Miny H, Schultze JH: Handbuch der naturräumlichen Gliederung Deutschlands. Bad Godesberg, 2 Bde 1953, 1962.
40. Schröder W, Schmidt G: Defining ecoregions as framework for the assessment of ecological monitoring networks in Germany by means of GIS and classification and regression trees (CART). Gate to EHS 2001, 1-9.
41. Agricultural statistics - Statistik lokal 1999, 2003, 2007. [http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/ Navigation/Publikationen/Querschnittsveroeffentlichungen/StatistikLokal.psml].
42. Kleppin L, Aden C, Schmidt G, Schröder W: Monitoring of genetically modified maize cultivation by means of WebGIS and Google Maps. In Geospatial Crossroads @ GI-Forum '08: Proceedings of the Geoinformatics Forum Salzburg. Edited by: Car A, Griesebner G, Strobl J. Heidelberg, Wichmann; 2008:170-179.
43. Spatial information of the federal state of Brandenburg. [http://www.mugv. brandenburg.de/cms/detail.php/bb2.c.515599.de].
44. Monitoring sites within biosphere reserves in Brandenburg. [http://lanuweb.fh-eberswalde.de/oeub/dbf.html].
45. Hofmann F, Epp R, Kalchschmid A, Kratz W, Kruse L, Kuhn U, Maisch B, Müller E, Ober S, Radtke J, Schlechtriemen U, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Von der der Ohe W, Vögel R, Wedl N, Wosniok W: Monitoring of Bt-Maize pollen exposure in the vicinity of the nature reserve Ruhlsdorfer Bruch in northeast Germany 2007 to 2008. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 2010.
46. Rosi-Marshall EJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, Whiles MR, Evans-White M, Chambers C, Griffith NA, Pokelsek J, Stephen ML: Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream. PNAS 2007, 104:16204-16208. (Pubitemid 350099385)
47. Schmidt G, Schröder W: GIS-gestützte Analysen zur möglichen Gefährdung von Naturschutzgebieten durch den Anbau gentechnisch veränderter Kulturpflanzen. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 2009, 21(1):76-93.
48. Mattile HR, Sears MK, Duan JJ: Response of Danaus plexippus to pollen of two new Bt-corn events via laboratory bioassay. Entomol Exp Appl 2005, 116:31-41. (Pubitemid 40886723)
49. Graef F, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Graef F, Stachow U: Determinig ecoregions for environmental and GMO monitoring networks. Environ Monit Assess 2005, 108:189-203. (Pubitemid 41386754)
50. Finck M, Seitz H, Beismann H: Concepts for General Surveillance: VDI proposals. Standardisation and harmonisation in the field of GMO monitoring. J Consum Protect Food Safety 2006, 1:11-14. (Pubitemid 44951549)
51. WebGIS application of the Federal Nature Conservation Agency. [http://www.bfn. de/geoinfo/gvo].
52. Risk Register Genetic Engineering Agriculture. [http://www. risikoregister. de].
53. ® - Werkzeuge zur Erstellung, Recherche und Verteilung von Metadaten. In Angewandte Geoinformatik 2007. Edited by: Strobl J, Blaschke Th, Griesebener G. Heidelberg: Wichmann; 2007:338-343.
54. Rissler J, Mellon M: International implications of commercialization (Transgenic Crops) in the ecological risks of engineered crops Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
55. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development): Emerging Risks in the 21st Century. An Agenda for Action Paris: OECD; 2003.
56. Wilkinson MJ, Davenport IJ, Charters YM, Jones AE, Allainguillaume J, Butler HT, Mason DC, Raybould AF: A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its wild progenitors. Mol Ecol 2000, 9:983-991. (Pubitemid 30466712)
57. Züghart W, Breckling B: Konzeptionelle Entwicklung eines Monitoring von Umweltwirkungen transgener Kulturpflanzen. UBA-Texte 2003, 50/03:1-543.
58. Janicke L, Janicke U: Enhancement of a diagnostic wind field model for licensing industrial facilities (TA Luft). Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Anlagenbezogener Immissionsschutz. Förderkennzeichen (UFOPLAN) 203 43 256. Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Berlin 2004.