In vivo assessment of total hip femoral head separation from the acetabular cup during 4 common daily activities

Orthopedics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Blumenfeld, Thomas J ^a   Glaser, Diana A ^b   Bargar, William L ^a   Langston, Glen D ^c   Mahfouz, Mohamed R ^d   Komistek, Richard D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FLUOROSCOPY; GAIT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; TASK PERFORMANCE; HIP PROSTHESIS; JOINT INSTABILITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; STIMULATION;

ACETABULUM; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 79958180642     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20110427-06     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(11):1619-1626. (Pubitemid 24036438)
2. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001; 34(7):859-871. (Pubitemid 32530054)
3. Aminian K, Trevisan C, NajafiB, et al. Evaluation of an ambulatory system for gait analysis in hip osteoarthritis after total hip replacement. Gait Posture. 2004; 20(1):102-107. (Pubitemid 38758035)
4. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Northcut EJ, Ochoa JA, Ritchie A. “In vivoâ€unknown sign determination of hip joint separation and the forces generated due to impact loading conditions. J Biomech. 2001; 34(5):623-629. (Pubitemid 32328250)
5. Glaser D, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Miner TM. In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty [Published online ahead of print November 26, 2007]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23(2):127-134. (Pubitemid 351172536)
6. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Ochoa JA, Haas BD, Hammill C. In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-onpolyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(10):1836-1841. (Pubitemid 35176478)
7. Stansfield BW, Nicol AC. Hip joint contact forces in normal subjects and subjects with total hip prostheses: walking and stair and ramp negotiation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002; 17(2):130-139. (Pubitemid 34097760)
8. Cristofolini L, Saponara TA, Savigni P, Erani P, Viceconti M. Preclinical assessment of the long-term endurance of cemented hip stems. Part 1: effect of daily activitiesâ€"a comparison of two load histories. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007; 221(6):569-584. (Pubitemid 47553521)
9. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants? J Biomech. 1995; 28(5):535-553.
10. Davy DT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, et al. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(1):45-50. (Pubitemid 18054891)
11. Taylor SJ, Perry JS, Meswania JM, Donald-son N, Walker PS, Cannon SR. Telemetry of forces from proximal femoral replacements and relevance to fixation. J Biomech. 1997; 30(3):225-234. (Pubitemid 27077494)
12. Hodge WA, Carlson KL, Fijan RS, et al. Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(9):1378-1386. (Pubitemid 20005534)
13. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. Kinematic evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with various bearing materials. In: Benazzo F, Falez F, Dietrich M, eds. Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty: 11th BIOLOX Symposium Proceedings. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff; 2006:81-92.
14. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Fada RA, Northcut EJ. An in vivo determination of total hip arthroplasty pistoning during activity. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(6):702-709.
15. Northcut EJ. In vivo determination of hip joint separation [Engineering thesis]. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines; 1998.
16. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement (1). N Engl J Med. 1990; 323(11):725-731.
17. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2):217-220. (Pubitemid 8311727)
18. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Ortho Relat Res. 1996; (331):107-117.
19. Mahfouz MR, Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA. A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22(12):1561-1574.
20. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, Agostini S. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subject implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(8):1049-1054. (Pubitemid 35462949)
21. Bertin KC, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Hoff WA, Anderson DT, Langer T. In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciateretaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(8):1040-1048. (Pubitemid 35462948)
22. Cates HE, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Schmidt MA, Anderle M. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics for subjects having either a posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty [Published online ahead of print March 14, 2008]. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(7):1057-1067.