The relationship between end-state comfort effects and memory performance in serial and free recall

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 292-299

  Logan, S Wood ^a   Fischman, Mark G ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

End state comfort; Memory; Motor planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 79958164321     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adalbjornsson C.F., Fischman M.G., Rudisill M. The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2008, 79(1):36-41.
2. Baddeley A. The psychology of memory 1976, Basic Books, New York.
3. Baddeley A. Short-term and working memory. The Oxford handbook of memory 2000, 77-91. Oxford University Press, New York. E. Tulving, F.I.M. Craik (Eds.).
4. Bernstein N. The co-ordination and regulation of movements 1967, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, England.
5. Bjork R.A., Whitten W.B. Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6(2):173-189.
6. Bonanni R., Pasqualetti P., Caltagirone C., Carlesimo G.A. Primacy and recency effects in immediate free recall of sequences of spatial positions. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2007, 105:483-500.
7. Chapman K.M., Weiss D.J., Rosenbaum D.A. Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2010, 124:229-232.
8. Cohen R.G., Rosenbaum D.A. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 157:486-495.
9. Cornell H.H., Bergstrom L.I. Serial position effects of faces in infants' recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 1983, 11:494-499.
10. Craik F.I.M., Lockhart R.S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11:671-684.
11. Craik F.F.M., Tulving E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1975, 104(3):268-294.
12. Crowder R.G. Principles of learning and memory 1976, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Fischman M.G. End-state comfort in object manipulation [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1997, 68:A-60. (Suppl.).
14. Fischman M.G., Kilborn C.R. End-state comfort and minimal manipulation effects in the overturned glass task. [Abstract]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2006, 28:S66. (Suppl.).
15. Fischman M.G., McAlister R.B., Kinley S.J. Concurrence costs in non-speeded secondary tasks. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2005, 48:281-290.
16. Fischman M.G., Stodden D.F., Lehman D.M. The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2003, 74:17-24.
17. Fischman M.G., Urbin M.A., Robinson L.E. End-state comfort, spatial bimanual coupling, and ecological relevance. [Abstract]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2010, 32:S78. (Suppl.).
18. Glanzer M. Storage mechanisms in recall. The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory 1972, Vol. 5. Academic Press, New York. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
19. Glanzer M., Cunitz A.R. Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1966, 5:351-360.
20. Hart M.A., Dornier L.A., Reeve T.G. Divided attention costs for speeded and non-speeded movements to near and far targets. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2006, 51(6):371-381.
21. Hockey R. Rate of presentation in running memory and direct manipulation of input-processing strategies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 25:104-111.
22. Hughes C.M.L., Franz E.A. Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 188:541-550.
23. Janssen L., Crajé C., Weigelt M., Steenbergen B. Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: Two plans for two hands?. Motor Control 2010, 14:240-254.
24. Kantowitz B.H. Double stimulation. Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition 1974, 83-131. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. B.H. Kantowitz (Ed.).
25. Kunde W., Krauss H., Weigelt M. Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination. Psychological Research 2009, 73:34-42.
26. Kunde W., Weigelt M. Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(1):145-156.
27. Manoel E.J., Moreira C.R.P. Planning manipulative hand movements: Do young children show the end-state comfort effect?. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2005, 49:93-114.
28. Maylor E.A. Serial position effects in semantic memory: Reconstructing the order of verses of hymns. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9(4):816-820.
29. Miller G.A., Galanter E., Pribram K.H. Plans and the structure of behavior 1960, Henry Holt & Co., New York.
30. Murdock B.B. The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962, 64(5):482-488.
31. Navon D., Gopher D. On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review 1979, 86:214-255.
32. Noble M.E., Sanders A.F., Trumbo D.A. Concurrence costs in double stimulation tasks. Acta Psychologica 1981, 49:141-158.
33. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective 1990, North-Holland, Amsterdam. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
34. Reed P. Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(2):411-422.
35. Rosenbaum D.A., Marchak F., Barnes H.J., Vaughan J., Slotta J.D., Jorgensen M.J. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and performance XIII - Motor representation and control 1990, 321-342. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
36. Rosenbaum D.A., van Heugten C.M., Caldwell G.E. From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster-effect. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94:59-85.
37. Rosenbaum D.A., Vaughan J., Barnes H.J., Jorgensen M.J. Time course of movement planning: Selection of hand grips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:1058-1073.
38. Rundus D. Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 89(1):63-77.
39. Short M.W., Cauraugh J.H. Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychologica 1999, 100:243-252.
40. Tam L., Ward G. A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1589-1625.
41. Terry S.W. Serial position effects in recall of television commercials. The Journal of General Psychology 2005, 132(2):151-163.
42. Weigelt M., Kunde W., Prinz W. End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53(2):143-148.
43. Weigelt M., Rosenbaum D.A., Huelshorst S., Schack T. Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:68-79.
44. Weiss D.J., Wark J.D., Rosenbaum D.A. Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science 2007, 18(12):1063-1068.
45. Wright A.A., Santiago H.C., Sands S.F., Kendrick D.F., Cook R.G. Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. Science 1985, 229:287-289.