A cautionary note on using the internet to survey recent hunter education graduates

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 216-218

  Petchenik, Jordan ^a   Watermolen, Dreux J ^a  

^a WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958138999     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2011.563434     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 159-178). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
3. Duda, M. D., & Nobile, J. L. (2010). The fallacy of online surveys: No data are better than bad data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15, 55-64.
4. Internet World Statistics. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/unitedstate.htm
5. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). GenerationM2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Retrieved from www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm.
6. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
7. Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79-104.
8. Petchenik, J. (2010). Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Personal data, 1987-2010. Madison, Wisconsin.
9. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (2010). Bureau of Law Enforcement. Madison, Wisconsin.