Efficacies of inocula on the startup of anaerobic reactors treating dairy manure under stirred and unstirred conditions

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2705-2720

  Pandey, Pramod K ^a   Ndegwa, Pius M ^b   Soupir, Michelle L ^a   Alldredge, J Richard ^b   Pitts, Marvin J ^c  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Washington State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Dairy manure; Inocula; Methanogens; Mixing; Syntrophobacter

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC LAGOONS; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DAIRY MANURE; DAIRY MANURES; GRANULAR SLUDGE; INOCULA; MICROCOLONIES; MIXED CULTURES; PERFORMANCE RANKINGS; SPECIFIC METHANE PRODUCTION; SYNTROPHOBACTER; TOTAL SOLIDS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROGRAPH; VOLATILE SOLID;

BIOGAS; GRANULAR MATERIALS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; MANURES; METHANE; METHANOGENS; REACTOR STARTUP; SEWAGE LAGOONS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOGAS; BIOREACTOR; DAIRY FARMING; DIGESTIBILITY; FATTY ACID; MANURE; METABOLISM; METHANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

SYNTROPHOBACTER;

EID: 79958136282     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Official energy statics from the U.S. Government, EIA 2006, Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/energyconsumption.html.
2. Salminen E.A., Rintala J.A. Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time and loading. Water Res 2002, 36:3175-3182.
3. Agricultural waste management field handbook 1992, USDA-SCS.
4. A system approach to biogas technology 1997, Fao.
5. Vavilin V.A., Fernandez B., Palatsi J., Flotats X. Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model. Waste Manage 2008, 28:939-959.
6. Vedrenne F., Beline F., Dabert P., Bernet N. Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:146-155.
7. Fang H.H.P. Microbial distribution in UASB granules and its resulting effects. Water Sci Technol 2000, 42:201-208.
8. Griffin M.E., McMahon K.D., Mackie R.I., Raskin L. Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998, 57:342-355.
9. Hulshoff Pol L.W., De Castro Lopes S.I., Lettinga G., Lens P.N. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Res 2004, 2004:1376-1389.
10. Schmidt J.E., Ahring B.K. Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996, 49:229-246.
11. Björnsson L., Mattiasson B., Henrysson T. Effects of support material on the pattern of volatile fatty acid accumulation at overload in anaerobic digestion of semi-solid waste. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1997, 47:640-644.
12. Gijzen H.J., Schoenmakers T.J.M., Caerteling C.G.M., Vogels G.D. Anaerobic degradation of papermill sludge in a two-phase digester containing rumen microorganisms and colonized polyurethane foam. Biotechnol Lett 1988, 10:61-66.
13. Huysman P., Meenen P., Assche P., Verstraete W. Factors affecting the colonization of non-porous and porous packing materials in model upflow methane reactors. Biotechnol Lett 1983, 5:643-648.
14. Masse D.I., Masse L., Verville A., Bilodeau S. The start-up of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors at 20°C and 25°C for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2001, 76:393-400.
15. Ahring B.K., Sandberg M., Angelidaki I. Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digesters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1995, 43:559-565.
16. Wu J.H., Liu W.T., Tseng I.C., Cheng S.S. Characterization of a 4-methylbenzoate-degrading methanogenic consortium as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. J Biosci Bioeng 2001, 91:449-455.
17. Raposo F., Borja R., Martín M.A., Martín A., de la Rubia M.A., Rincón B. Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem Eng J 2009, 149:70-77.
18. Liu G., Zhang R., El-Mashad H.M., Dong R. Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100:5103-5108.
19. Ghaly A.E., Ramkumar D.R., Sadaka S.S., Rochon J.D. Effect of reseeding and pH control on the performance of a two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digester operating on acid cheese whey. Can Agr Eng 2000, 42:173-184.
20. Amin M.M., Zilles J.L., Greiner J., Charbonneau S., Raskin L., Orgenroth E. Influence of the antibiotic erythromycin on anaerobic treatment of a pharmaceutical wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 2006, 40:3971-3977.
21. Chen T.H., Hashimoto A.G. Effects of pH and substrate: inoculum ratio on batch methane fermentation. Bioresour Technol 1996, 56:179-186.
22. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1995, APHA, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation. 19th ed.
23. Poggi-Varaldo H.M., Oleszkiewicz J.A. Anaerobic cocomposting of municipal solid-waste and waste sludge at high total solids levels. Environ Technol 1998, 13:409-421.
24. Conover W.J., Iman R.L. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 1981, 35:124-129.
25. Lettinga G., Hulshoff Pol L.W. UASB-process design for various types of wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 1991, 24:87-107.
26. McMahon K.D., Stroot P.G., Mackie R.I., Raskin L. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-II: microbial population dynamics. Water Res 2001, 35:1817-1827.
27. Vavilin V.A., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005, 89:113-122.
28. Chynoweth D.P., Pullammanappallil P. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes. Microbiology of solid waste 1996, CrC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. A.C. Palmisano, M.A. Barlaz (Eds.).
29. Stroot P.G., McMahon K.D., Mackie R.I., Raskin L. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-I. Digester performance. Water Res 2001, 35:1804-1816.
30. Show K.Y., Wang Y., Foong S.F., Tay J.H. Accelerated start-up and enhanced granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Res 2004, 38:2293-2304.
31. Wu W., Hickey R.F., Zeikus J.G. Characterization of metabolic performance of methanogenic granules treating brewery wastewater: role of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991, 57:3438-3449.
32. Mclnerney M.J., Gieg L.M. An overview of anaerobic metabolism. Strict and facultative anaerobes: medical and environmental aspects 2004, Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, England. M.M. Nakano, P. Zuber (Eds.).
33. Wu J.H., Liu W.T., Tseng I.C., Cheng S.S. Characterization of microbial consortia in a terephthalate-degrading anaerobic granular sludge system. Microbiology 2001, 147:373-382.
34. Angenent L.T., Sung S., Raskin L. Formation of granules and Methanosaeta fibers in an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR). Environ Microbiol 2004, 6:315-322.
35. Sung S., Santha H. Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating dairy cattle wastes. Water Res 2003, 37:1628-1636.
36. Zhang R.H., Tao J., Dugba P.N. Evaluation of two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactor systems for animal wastewater treatment. Trans ASABE 2000, 43:1795-1801.
37. Dugba P.N., Zhang R.H. Treatment of dairy wastewater with two-state anaerobic sequencing batch reactor systems- thermophilic versus mesophilic operations. Bioresour Technol 1999, 68:225-233.
38. Bhati Z.I., Furukawa K., Fujita M. Comparative composition and characteristics of methanogenic granular sludges treating industrial wastes under different conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 1995, 79:273-280.
39. Fukuzaki S., Nishio N., Nagai S. High rate performance and characterization of granular methanogenic sludges in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors fed with various defined subtrates. J Ferment Bioeng 1995, 79:354-359.
40. Holland K.T., Knapp J.S., Shoesmith J.G. Anaerobic bacteria 1987, Blackie Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.
41. Field J.A. Limits of anaerobic biodegradation. Water Sci Technol 2002, 45:9-10.
42. Kudo H, Imai S, Jalaludin S, Fukuta K, Cheng KJ. Ruminants and rumen microorganisms in tropical countries. In: Proceedings of the International Livestock Research Institute. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1995.
43. Oremland R.S. Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. Biology of anaerobic microorganisms 1998, J. Wiley and Sons, N.Y. A.J.B. Zehnder (Ed.).
44. Quarmby J., Forster C.F. An examination of the structure of UASB granules. Water Res 1995, 29:2449-2454.
45. Robinson R.F., Akin D.E., Nordstedt R.A., Thomas M.V., Aldrich H.C. Light and electron microscopic examinations of methane-producing biofilms from anaerobic fixed-bed reactors. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 48:127-136.
46. Angenent L.T., Sung S., Raskin L. Formation of granules and Methanosaeta fibers in an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR). Environ Microbiol 2004, 6:315-322.
47. Nankivell A, Andre N, Thomas-Keprta K, Allen C, McKay D. Sulfur Spring: Busy Intersection and Possible Martian Analogue. In: 31st Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference; 2000.
48. Mach KF, Ellis TG. Performance characteristics of the static granular bed reactor. In: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 72nd Annual Conference and Exposition 2000. California; 2000.
49. Alfons J.M.S., Xiuzhu D. Role of formate and hydrogen in the degradation of propionate and butyrate by defined suspended cocultures of acetogenic and methanogenic bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1995, 68:281-284.
50. Vogels G.D., Hoppe W.F., Stumm C.K. Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1980, 40:608-612.
51. Dubourguier H.C., Archer D.B., Albagnac G., Prensier G. Structure and metabolism of methanogenic microbial conglomerates. Anaerobic digestion 1988, Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. E.R. Hall, P.N. Hobson (Eds.).
52. Hwang K., Song M., Kim W., Kim N., Hwang S. Effects of prolonged starvation on methanogenic population dynamics in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:S2-S6.
53. Ike M., Inoue D., Miyano T., Liu T., Sei K., Soda S., et al. Microbial population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic digester treating industrial food waste in Kyoto eco-energy project. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:3952-3957.
54. Shin S., Lee S., Lee C., Hwang K., Hwang S. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:9461-9470.
55. Shin S., Han G., Lim J., Lee C., Hwang S. A comprehensive microbial insight into two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste-recycling wastewater. Water Res 2010, 44:4838-4849.
56. Lee C., Kim J., Hwang K., O'Flaherty V., Hwang S. Quantitative analysis of methanogenic community dynamics in three anaerobic batch digesters treating different wastewaters. Water Res 2009, 43:157-165.