Diagnosis of the nutrient compositional space of fruit crops;Diagnóse da composição nutricional em plantas frutíferas

Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 321-334

  Parent, Léon Étienne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aitchison distance; Centred log ratio (CND clr); Compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND); Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS); Isometric log ratio (CND ilr); Mahalanobis distance

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 79958126192     PISSN: 01002945     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-29452011000100041     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. AITCHISON, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. London: Chapman and Hall, 1986. 416 p.
2. AITCHISON, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, Oxford, v. 44, n. 2, p. 139-177, 1982.
3. BATES, T.E. Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plants and their evaluation: a review. Soil Science, Baltimore, v. 112, p. 116-130, 1971.
4. BAYENS, J. Nutrition des plantes de culture. Louvain: Nauwelalaerts, Université de Louvain, 1967. 678 p.
5. BEAUFILS, E.R. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal, 1973. 132 p. (Soil Science Bulletin, 1)
6. BERGMANN, W. Ernährungs-störungen bei Kulturpflanzen. Stuttgart: Verlag Gustav Fischer. 1988. v.2, 762 p.
7. BEVERLY, R.B. Modified DRIS method for simplified nutrient diagnosis of 'Valencia' oranges. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v. 10, p. 1401-1408, 1987a.
8. BEVERLY, R.B. Comparison of DRIS and alternative nutrient diagnostic methods for soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v. 10, p. 901-920, 1987b.
9. BHUPAL RAJ, G.; PRASAD RAO, A. Identification of yield-limiting nutrients in mango through DRIS indices. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v.37, n. 11-12, p. 1761-1774, 2006.
10. CALLOT, G.; CHAMAYOU, H.; MAERTENS, C.; SALSAC, L. Mieux comprendre les interactions sol-racine: incidence sur la nutrition minérale. Paris: INRA, 1982. 325 p.
11. EGOZCUE, J.J.; PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V. Simplicial geometry for compositional data. In: BUCCIANTI, A.; MATEU-FIGUERAS, G.; PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V. (Ed.). Compositional data analysis in the geosciences: from theory to practice. London: Geological Society, 2006. p. 145-159. (Special Publication, 264)
12. EGOZCUE, J.J.; PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V. Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, New York, v. 37, p. 795-828, 2005.
13. EGOZCUE, J.J.; PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V.; MATEU-FIGUERAS, G.; BARCELÓ-VIDAL, C. Isometric logration transformations for compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, New York, v. 35, p. 279-300, 2003.
14. ELWALI, A.M.O.; GASCHO, G.J. Soil testing, foliar analysis, and DRIS as guide for sugarcane fertilization. Agronomy Journal, Madison, v. 76, p. 466-470, 1984.
15. FILZMOSER, P; HRON, K. Outlier detection for compositional data using robust methods. Mathematical Geosciences, New York, v. 40, p. 243-248, 2008.
16. GIAMPIETRO, M. Multi-scale integrated analysis of agroecosystems. Boca Raton,: CRC Press, 2004. 437 p.
17. GÜSEWELL, S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, Cambridge, v. 164, p. 243-266, 2004.
18. HADI, A. A modification of a method for the detection of outliers in multivariate samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Série B, Oxford, v.56, p. 393-396, 1994.
19. HADI, A. Identifying multiple outliers in multivariate data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serie B, Oxford, v.54, p. 761-771, 1992.
20. HALLMARK, W.B.; MOOY, C.J. de; PESEK, J. Comparison of two DRIS methods for diagnosing nutrient deficiencies. Journal of Fertilizer Issues, Manchester,v. 4, p. 151-158, 1987.
21. HERNANDEZ-CARABALLO, E.A.; RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, O.; RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ, V. Evaluation of the Boltzmann equation as an alternative model in the selection of the high-yield subsample within the framework of the compositional nutrient diagnosis system. Environmental & Experimental Botany, Elmsford, v. 64, n. 3, p. 225-231, 2008.
22. HOLLAND, D.A. The interpretation of leaf analysis. Journal of Horticultural Science. London, v. 41, p. 311-329, 1966.
23. HUNDAL, H.S.; SINGH, D.; BRAR, J.S. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System for Monitoring Nutrient Status of Mango Trees in Submountainous Area of Punjab, India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 36, n. 15-16, p. 2085-2099, 2005.
24. JONES, W.W. Proposed modifications of the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) for interpreting plant analyses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 12, p. 785-794, 1981.
25. KENWORTHY, A.L. Leaf analysis as an aid in fertilizing orchards. In: WALSH, L.M.; BEATON, J.D. (Ed.). Soil testing and plant analysis. 5th ed. Madison: Soil Soil Science Society of America, 1983. p.381-392.
26. KHIARI, L.; PARENT, L.E.; TREMBLAY, N. Selecting the high-yield subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agronomy Journal, Madison, v. 93, p. 802-808, 2001a.
27. KHIARI, L.; PARENT, L.E.; TREMBLAY, N. Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agronomy Journal, Madison, v. 93, p. 809-814, 2001b.
28. KUMAR, P.S.S.; GEETHA, S.A.; SAVITHRI, P.; MAHENDRAN, P.P.; RAGUNATH, K.P. Evaluation of DRIS and CND indexes for effective nutrient management in Muscat grapevines (Vitis vinefera). Journal of Applied Horticulture, Lucknow, v. 5, n. 2, p. 76-80, 2003.
29. LAGATU, H.; MAUME, L. The variations of the sum N + P205 + K20 per 100 parts of dry material of the leaf of a cultivated plant. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie D'Agriculture de France, Paris, v. 21, p. 85-92, 1935.
30. MALAVOLTA, E. Manual de nutrição de plantas.Piracicaba: Ceres, 2006. 631 p.
31. MARSCHNER, H. Mineral nutritionof higher plants. New York: Academic Press, 1986.674 p.
32. MARTIN-FERNANDEZ, J. A.; BARCELO-VIDAL, C.; PAWLOWSKY, V. Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets using nonparametric imputation. Mathematical Geology, New York, v. 35, p. 253-278, 2003.
33. MASSART, D.L.; VANDEGINSTE, B.G.M.; BUYDENS, L.M.C.; DE JONG, S.; LEWI, P.J.; SMEYERS-VERBEKE, J. Data handling and technology 20A: handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics. New York: Elsevier, 1997. p1., 867 p.
34. MONTEIRO TERRA, M.; GERGOLETTI, I.F.; PIRES, E.J.P.; BOTELHO, R.V.; DOS SANTOS, W.R.; TECCHIO, M.A. Evaluation of the nutritional condition of Italia grapevine in the region of São Miguel Arcanjo-SP, using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, Jaboticabal, v. 29, n. 3, p. 710-716, 2007.
35. MOURÃO FILHO, F.D.A. DRIS and Sufficient Range Approaches in Nutritional Diagnosis of "Valencia" Sweet Orange on Three Rootstocks. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v. 28, n. 4, p. 691-705, 2005.
36. MOURÃO FILHO, F.D.A. DRIS: concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops. Scientia Agricultura, Piracicaba, v. 61, n. 5, p. 550-560, 2004.
37. NELSON, L. A.; ANDERSON, R. L. Partitioning of soil test-crop response probability. In: STELLY, M. (Ed.). Soil testing: correlating and interpreting the analytical results. Madison: American Society of Agronomy,1984. p. 19-38. (Special Publication, 29).
38. ODEH, I.; TODD, A.J.; TRIANTAFILIS, J. Spatial prediction of soil particle-size fractions as compositional data. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.168, p.501-515, 2003.
39. PARENT, L.E., GRANGER, R.L. Derivation of DRIS Norms from a High Density Apple Orchard Established in Quebec Appalachians. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, Alexandria, v. 114, n. 6, p. 915-919, 1989.
40. PARENT, L. E.; DAFIR, M. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science, Alexandria, v. 117, p. 239-242, 1992.
41. PARENT, L.E.; NATALE, W.; ZIADI, N. Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis of Corn using the Mahalanobis Distance as Nutrient Imbalance Index. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, Ottawa, v. 89, p. 383-390, 2009.
42. PARENT, L.E.; CAMBOURIS, A.N; MUHAWENIMANA, A. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in potato crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Madison, v. 58, p. 1432-1438, 1994.
43. PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V.; EGOZCUE, J.J. Compositional data and Simpson's paradox. Codawork. In: COMPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS WORKSHOP, 3., 2008. Girona, Disponível em: urlhttp://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/718/1/Pawlowsky_Egozcue_SimpsonParadox.pdf. Acesso em: 27 may 2008.
44. PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V.; EGOZCUE, J.J. Compositional data and their analysis: an introduction. In: BUCCIANTI, A., MATEU-FIGUERAS, G., PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V. (Ed.). Compositional data analysis in the geosciences: from theory to practice. London: Geological Society, 2006. p.1-10. (Special Publication, 264)
45. RAGHUPATHI, H.B.; REDDU, Y. T. N.; KURIAN REJU, M.; BHARGAVA, B.S. Diagnosis of Nutrient Imbalance in Mango by DRIS and PCA Approaches. Journal of Plant Nutrition, New York, v. 27, n. 7, p. 1131-1148, 2005.
46. RIBEIRO NACHTIGALL, G.; DECHEN, A.R.DRIS Use on Apple Orchard Nutritional Evaluation in Response to Potassium Fertilization. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 38, n. 17-18, p. 2557-2566, 2007.
47. RIGHETTI, T.L.; ALKOSHAB, O.; KRIS WILDER, K. Verifying critical values from DRIS norms in sweet cherry and hazelnut. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 19, n. 13, p. 1449-1466, 1988.
48. RODRIGUEZ, O.; ROJAS, E.; SUMNER, M. Valencia orange DRIS norms for Venezuela. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 28, n. 15-16, p. 1461-1468, 1997.
49. SANZ, M. Evaluation of interpretation of DRIS system during growing season of the peach tree: Comparison with DOP method. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 30, p. 1025-1036, 1999.
50. SHARMA, J.; SHIKHAMANY, S.D.; SINGH, R.K.; RAGHUPATHI, H.B. Diagnosis of Nutrient Imbalance in Thompson Seedless Grape Grafted on Dog Ridge Rootstock by DRIS. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, New York, v. 36, n. 19-20, p. 2823-2838, 2005.
51. SMITH, G.S.; BUWALDA, J.B.; CLARK, C.J. Nutrient dynamics in a kiwifruit ecosystem. Scientia Horticulturae, Amsterdan, v. 37, p. 87-109, 1988.
52. STUART-CHAPIN III, S. Ecological aspects of plant nutrition. Advances in Plant Nutrition, New York, v. 3, p. 161-191, 1989.
53. THOMAS, C.W.; AITCHISON, J. Log-ratios and geochemical discrimination of Scottish Dalradian limestones: a case study. In: BUCCIANTI, A., MATEU-FIGUERAS, G., PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN, V. (Ed.). Compositional data analysis in the geosciences: from theory to practice. London: Geological Society, 2006. p.25-41. (Special Publication, 264).
54. TRIONFO, A. The relative nutrient requirements of plants: optimizing nutrient ratios in mixed fertilizers. 2000. Disponível em: .
55. UMESH, U.N.; PETERSON, R.A.; MCCANNNELSON, M.; VAIDYANATHAN, R. Type IV error in marketing research. The investigation of ANOVA interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Greenvale, v. 24, p. 17-26, 1996.
56. VRIES, O. DE. Ertragskurven, Ertragsgesetze und die Bedeutung der Gegenseitigen Beeinflussung der Wachstumsfaktoren. Zeitschritt für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, Weinheim, v. 14, p. 1-10, 1939.
57. WALWORTH, J.L.; SUMNER. M.E. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). Advances in Soil Science, New York, v. 6, p. 149-188, 1987.