Comparison study of output-only subspace and frequency-domain methods for system identification of base excited civil engineering structures

Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 305-312

  Kim, Junhee ^a   Lynch, Jerome P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; MODAL ANALYSIS; RELIGIOUS BUILDINGS; SEISMOLOGY; STATE SPACE METHODS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; FREQUENCY DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION; FREQUENCY-DOMAIN METHODS; STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION; SUBSPACE SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION METHODS; TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAINS; TIME-DOMAIN COMPARISONS;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

EID: 79958123509     PISSN: 21915644     EISSN: 21915652     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9316-8_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Ibrahim, S.R. and S.R. Pappa, Large Modal Survey Testing Using the Ibrahim Time Domain Identification Technique. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1982. 19(5): p. 459-465.
2. James, J.H., T.G. Carne, and J.P. Lauffer, The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for Modal Parameter Extraction from Operating Structures. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 1996. 10(4): p. 260-277.
3. Shih, C.Y., Y.G. Tsuei, R.J. Allemang, and D.L. Brown, Complex Mode Indication Function and its Applications to Spatial domain Parameter Estimation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1988. 2(4): p. 367-377.
4. Brinker, R., L. Zhang, and P. Andersen, Modal Identification of Output-only Systems Using Frequency Domain Decomposition. Smart Materials and Structures, 2001. 10(3): p. 441-445.
5. Ljung, L., System identification: Theory for the User. 1999, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Larimore, W.E. Canonical Variate Analysis in Identification, Filtering, and Adaptive Control. in 29th Conference on Decision and Control. 1990. Honolulu, HI.
7. Verhaegen, M., Identification of the Deterministic Part of MIMO State Space Models Given in Innovations form from Input-output Data. Automatica, 1994. 30(1): p. 61-74.
8. Van Overschee, P. and B. De Moor, N4SID: Subsapce Algorithms for the Identification of Combined Deterministic-Stochastic Systems. Automatica, 1994. 30(1): p. 75-93.
9. Peeters, B. and G.D. Roeck, Reference-based Stochastic Subspace Identification for Output-only Modal Analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1999. 13(6): p. 855-878.
10. Peeters, B. and C.E. Ventura, Comparative Study of Modal Analysis Techniques for Bridge Dynamic Characterizes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2003. 17(5): p. 965-988.
11. Oppenhiem, A.V. and R.W. Schafer, Discrete-time Signal Processing. 1999, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.