FeedLack detects missing feedback in web applications

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2177-2186

  Ko, Andrew J ^a   Zhang, Xing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; JavaScript; Program analysis; Static analysis

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK;

APPLICATION BEHAVIORS; CONTROL-FLOW; FLOW PATH; JAVASCRIPT; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; USABILITY METHODS; USABILITY PROBLEMS; USER STUDY; WEB APPLICATION; WEB APPLICATIONS;

STATIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 79958120057     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979260     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Akers, D., Simpson, M., Jeffries, R., & Winograd, T. 2009. Undo and erase events as indicators of usability problems. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing (CHI), 659-668.
2. Artzi, S., Dolby, J., Tip, F., & Pistoia, M. 2010. Practical fault localization for dynamic web applications. Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), 265-274.
3. Ayewah, N., Pugh, W., Morgenthaler, J. D., Penix, J., & Zhou, Y. 2007. Evaluating static analysis defect warnings on production software. ACM Workshop on Program Analysis For Software Tools and Engr., 1-8.
4. Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., & Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the web. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 463-470.
5. Bodden, E. & Havelund, K. 2008. Racer: effective race detection using AspectJ. Int'l Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), 155-166.
6. Bruun, A., Gull, P., Hofmeister, L., & Stage, J. 2009. Let your users do the testing: a comparison of three remote asynchronous usability testing methods. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 1619-1628.
7. Godefroid, P., Levin, M.Y., & Molnar, D.A. 2008. Automated whitebox fuzz testing. Network Distributed Security Symposium (NDSS).
8. Hovemeyer, D. & Pugh, W. 2004. Finding bugs is easy. ACM Conf. on Object-Oriented Prog. Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), 132-136.
9. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. 1985. Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 1(4), December, 311-338.
10. Ivory, M. Y. & Hearst, M. A. 2001. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 33(4), December, 470-516. (Pubitemid 33720523)
11. Ko, A.J. & Wobbrock, J.O. 2010. Cleanroom: Edit-time error detection with the uniqueness heuristic. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, to appear.
12. Ko, A.J. & Myers, B.A. 2008 Debugging reinvented: asking and answering why and why not questions about program behavior. Int'l Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 301-310.
13. Lecerof, A. & Paterno F. 1998. Automatic support for usability evaluation. IEEE Trans on Software Engineering (TSE) 24(10), October, 863-888. (Pubitemid 128739731)
14. Lindgaard, G. & Chattratichart, J. 2007. Usability testing: what have we overlooked? ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1415-1424. (Pubitemid 47581733)
15. Mahajan, R. & Shneiderman, B. 1997. Visual and textual consistency checking tools for graphical user interfaces. IEEE Trans. on Soft. Engr. 23(11), 722-735. (Pubitemid 127762232)
16. Nielsen, J. & Molich, R. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249-256.
17. Norman, D.A. 1988. The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
18. Novark, G., Berger, E.D., & Zorn, B.G. 2009. Efficiently and precisely locating memory leaks and bloat. ACM Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), 397-407.
19. Richards, G., Lebresne, S., Burg, B., & Vitek, J. 2010. An analysis of the dynamic behavior of JavaScript programs. SIGPLAN Notices 45(6), June, 1-12.