Formulation development and rheological studies of palatable cefetamet pivoxil hydrochloride dry powder suspension

DARU, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 118-125

  Sateesha, S B ^a   Rajamma, A J ^b   Shekar, H S ^c   Divakar, G ^a  

^a ACHARYA AND B M REDDY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY   (India)

^b KLE College of Pharmacy   (India)

^c VV Pura Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences ^*  (India)

Author keywords

Complexation; Eudragit E100; Indion 239; Thixotropy

Indexed keywords

ASPARTAME; BRONOPOL; CEFETAMET PIVOXIL; DISODIUM HYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; DRUG CARRIER; EUDRAGIT; INDION 234; ION EXCHANGE RESIN; LACTOSE; MANNITOL; METHYL PARABEN; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; POLACRILIN; PROPYL PARABEN; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; STARCH GLYCOLATE SODIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEGRADATION; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG STABILITY; DRUG STORAGE; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRY POWDER; FILM COATING; FLOW; FLOW KINETICS; FREEZING; HUMAN; MOISTURE; NORMAL HUMAN; PALATABILITY; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SHEAR FLOW; SUSPENSION; THIXOTROPY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 79958103368     PISSN: 15608115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cefetamet pivoxil HCl. Offcial monographs for part I, Japanese Pharmacopoeia XIV. 328-329.
2. Hayton WL, Walstad RA, Thurmann-Nielsen E, Kufaas T, Kneer J, Ambros RJ, Rugstad HE, Monn E, Bodd E, Stoeckel K. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefetamet and oral cefetamet pivoxil in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1991; 35: 720-725.
3. Houl P, Von AG, Jacqueline ZI. Cefetamet pivoxil: Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of the free acid against 355 gram-negative rods. Infection, 1988; 16:194-198.
4. Bryson HM, Brogden RN. Cefetamet pivoxil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drug, 1993; 45:589-621.
5. Stoeckel K, Harell M, Dan M. Penetration of cefetamet pivoxil and cefuroxime axetil into the maxillary sinus mucosa at steady state. Antimicrobial Agents Chemothe, 1996; 40:780-783.
6. Nalinee A, Surapee P. In Vitro Activity of Cefetamet, A New Beta-Lactamase Stable Oral Cephalosporin. J Infect Dis Antimicrob Agent, 1990; 7: 1-3.
7. Paharia A, Yadav AK, Rai G, Jain SK, Pancholi SS, Agrawal GP. Eudragit-coated Pectin Microspheres of 5-Fluorouracil for Colon Targeting. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2007; 8: E1-E7.
8. Harmik S, Yasmin S, Roop KK. Taste Masking Technologies in Oral Pharmaceuticals: Recent Developments and Approaches. Drug Dev and Ind. Pha., 2004; 30: 429-448.
9. Inderbirsingh, Ashish K, Rehni, Rohit K, Gaurav J, Manoj kumar, Hassan Y. Aboul-enein. Ion Exchange Resins: Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Applications: Scientific Review. Fabad J. Pharm. Sci, 2007; 32: 91-100.
10. Mahore JG, Wadher KJ, Umekar MJ, Bhoyar PK. Ion Exchange Resins: Pharmaceutical Applications and Recent Advancement. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Re, 2010; 1: 8-13.
11. Kudela V. Editor. Encyclopedia of polymer sciences and engineering. New York, John Wiley. 1987.
12. Esposito E, Cortesi R, Luca G, Nastruzzi C. Pectin-Based Microspheres. Annals. New York Acad. Sci. 2006; 944: 160-179.
13. Chang SJ, Cheng-Chie Niu G, Kuo SM, Chen SF, Preparation and preliminary characterization of concentric multi-walled chitosan microspheres. J. Biomed Mat. Research, 2007; 81A: 554-566.
14. Irwin WJ, McHale R, Watts PJ. Drug Delivery by Ion Exchange Part VII: Release of Acidic Drugs from Anionic Exchange Resinate Complexes. Drug Dev and Ind. Pha. 1990; 16: 883-898.
15. Lisoni M. Morsch, Celso F. Bittencourt, Marines J, Souza E, Julie M. LC method for the analysis of cefetamet pivoxil hydrochloride in drug substance and powder for oral suspension. J. Pharm. Bio. Analysis, 2002; 30: 643-649.
16. Niklas S, Katharina R, Jyrki H, Jouko YF. Effect of Moisture on Powder Flow Properties of Theophylline. Pharmaceutics, 2010; 2: 275-290.
17. Gao Z, Moore TW, Smith AP, Doub WH, Westenberger BJ. Studies of variability in dissolution testing with USP apparatus 2. J.Pharm Sci, 2007; 96:1794-1801.
18. th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Ontario, Canada, 2000; 163-169.
19. Anand V, Kharb V, Kataria M, Kukka V, Choudhury PK. Taste assessment trials for sensory analysis of oral pharmaceutical products. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2008; 21: 438-450.
20. Ramakrishna C, Sripathi K, Sunki Reddy YR. Rheological behavior of syrups containing sugar substitutes. Eur Food Res Tech, 2006; 218: 345-348.
21. th ed Lippincott Williams and wilkins. Philadelphia, 1993; 561-583.