Supraglottic airways and pulmonary aspiration: The role of the drain tube;Les instruments ventilatoires supraglottiques et l'inhalation pulmonaire: le rôle du tube de drainage

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 56, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 715-720

  Drolet, Pierre ^a  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID ASPIRATION; EDITORIAL; ESOPHAGUS; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; PHYSIOLOGY; SAFETY; WOUND DRAINAGE;

DRAINAGE; ESOPHAGUS; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; RESPIRATORY ASPIRATION; SAFETY;

EID: 79958098666     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9156-0     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. El Beheiry H, Wong J, Nair G, et al. Improved esophageal patency when inserting the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway with an EschmannTM tracheal tube introducer. Can J Anesth 2009. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9141-7.
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9. (Pubitemid 38031650)
3. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 136-42. (Pubitemid 36284741)
4. Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Mostafa S, et al. The Combitube in elective surgery: a report of 200 cases. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 79-82. (Pubitemid 32055181)
5. Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11, 910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 129-33. (Pubitemid 26017393)
6. Verghese C, Smith TG, Young E. Prospective survey of the use of the laryngeal mask airway in 2359 patients. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 58-60. (Pubitemid 23063813)
7. Han TH, Brimacombe J, Lee EJ, Yang HS. The laryngeal mask airway is effective (and probably safe) in selected healthy parturients for elective cesarean section: a prospective study of 1067 cases. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 1117-21. (Pubitemid 34223649)
8. Hagberg CA, Vartazarian TN, Chelly JE, Ovassapian A. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and tracheal aspiration detected with pH electrodes is similar with the Laryngeal Mask Airway and Esophageal Tracheal Combitube-a pilot study. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 243-9. (Pubitemid 39010953)
9. Lallo A, Drolet P, Lacroix M. Performance of the PAxpress vs the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia. Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 28-33. (Pubitemid 46178783)
10. Petring OU, Adelhoj B, Jensen BN, Pedersen NO, Lomholt N. Prevention of silent aspiration due to leaks around cuffs of endotracheal tubes. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 777-80. (Pubitemid 16085796)
11. Russell GN, Yam PC, Tran J, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and tracheobronchial contamination after cardiac surgery: should a nasogastric tube be routine? Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 228-32. (Pubitemid 26255809)
12. Bercker S, Schmidbauer W, Volk T. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 445-8.
13. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-20.
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Can J Anesth 1999; 46: 1064-6. (Pubitemid 30002451)
15. Su BC, Yang MW, Lee HC, Chang CH, Lin CC. Protection against large-volume regurgitated fluid aspiration by the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2008; 46: 34-8.
16. Evans NR, Llewellyn RL, Gardner SV, James MF. Aspiration prevented by the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a case report. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 413-6. (Pubitemid 34546175)
17. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Boqusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135-9.
18. Gibbison B, Cook TM, Seller C. Case series: protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 415-7. (Pubitemid 351773645)
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-95. (Pubitemid 34121735)
20. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 527-33. (Pubitemid 34285203)
21. Drolet P, Girard M. An aid to correct positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 718-9. (Pubitemid 32894316)
22. Chen HS, Liu PH, Chung KC. The Rusch Flexi-Slip stylet for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion. Can J Anesth 2008; 55: 719-20.