Usability of car dashboard displays for elder drivers

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 493-502

  Kim, SeungJun ^a   Dey, Anind K ^a   Lee, Joonhwan ^c   Forlizzi, Jodi ^a,b  

^a Human Computer Interaction Institute ^*  (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Neowiz Lab   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Automotive UI; Dashboard; Dashboard display; Divided attention; Eye tracking; Interface design; Senior drivers

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INSTRUMENT PANELS; USER INTERFACES;

AUTOMOTIVE UI; AUTOMOTIVES; DASHBOARD; DASHBOARD DISPLAY; DISPLAY DESIGNS; DIVIDED ATTENTION; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; EYE-TRACKING; INTERFACE DESIGNS; SENIOR DRIVERS;

EYE TRACKING;

EID: 79958087713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Baldassi, S., & Burr, D. C. "Pop-out" of targets modulated in luminance or colour: the eVect of intrinsic and extrinsic uncertainty. Vision Research, 44 (2004), 1227-1233. (Pubitemid 38447060)
2. Baldwin, C.L. Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: Application of sensory-cognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues In Ergonomic Science, 3(4) (2002), 307-329.
3. Ball, K. and Owsley, C. Increasing mobility and reducing accidents of older drivers, in K. W. Schaie and M. Pietrucha (eds), Mobility and Transportation in the Elderly (New York: Springer) (2000), 213-250.
4. Ball, K., Owsley, C., Stalvey, B., Roenker, D.L., Sloane, M.E., & Graves, M. Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(3) (1998), 313-322. (Pubitemid 128401021)
5. Beck, J. Textural segmentation. In: Organization and Representation in Perception, Beck J, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1982), 285-317.
6. Booher, H.R. Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions. Human Factors, 17 (1975), 266-277.
7. Campbell, J.L., Richman, J.B., Carney, C. and Lee, J.D. In-vehicle display icons and other information elements: Volume I: Guidelines, Federal Highway Administration, 2004.
8. Carney, C., Campbell, J.L. and Mitchell, E.A. In-vehicle display icons and other information elements: Literature review, Federal Highway Administration, 1998.
9. Christ, R.E. Research for evaluating visual display codes: An emphasis on colour coding. In Easterby, R. and Zwaga, H. eds. Information design: The design and evaluation of signs and printed materials, John Wiley & Sons (1984), 209-228.
10. Collia, D., Sharp, J. and Giesbrecht, L. The 2001 national household travel survey: A look into the travel patterns of older Americans. Journal of Safety Research 34 (2003), 461-470.
11. Connor, C.E., Egeth, H.E. and Yantis, S. Visual attention: Bottom-up vs. top-down. Current Biology, 14 (2004), 850-852.
12. Dingus, T.A., Hulse, M.C., Mollenhauer, M.A., Fleischman, R.N., Mcgehee, D.V. and Manakkal, N. Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with and Advanced Traveler Information System, Human Factors, 39 (1997), 177-199 (Pubitemid 27327638)
13. Green, P. Visual and Task Demands of Driver Information Systems. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Technical Report UMTRI-98-16. Ann Arbor, MI, 1998.
14. Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., Siren, A. and Davidse, R. Older drivers - a review. VTI rapport 497A, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, 2004.
15. Ito, T. and Miki, Y. Japan's Safety Guideline on In-Vehicle Display Systems in Proceedings of the Fourth ITS World Congress. VERTIS, 1997.
16. Julesz, B. A brief outline of the textion theory of human vision. Trends in Neuroscience (1984), 41-45. (Pubitemid 14162018)
17. Kim, S. and Dey, A.K. Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation. In Proc. CHI 2009, 133-142.
18. Kumar, M. and Kim, T. Dynamic speedometer: dashboard redesign to discourage drivers from speeding. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, 1573-1576.
19. Lee, J., Forlizzi, J., and Hudson, S.E. Studying the effectiveness of MOVE: a contextually optimized in-vehicle navigation system. In Proc. CHI 2005, 571-580.
20. Mayer, D. and Laux, L. Evaluating Vehicle Displays for Older Drivers. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 1992.
21. McDougall, S., de Bruijn, O. and Curry, M. Exploring the effects of icon characteristics: Concreteness, complexity and distinctiveness. The J. of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4) (2000), 291-306.
22. McGehee, D. V. New design guidelines aim to reduce driver distraction. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 10, (2001), 1-3.
23. Monash University Accident Research Centre. (2006). The Elderly and Mobility: A Review of the Literature. Sponsored by Swedish Road Administration (SRA), Report No. 255.
24. Rockwell, T.H. Spare Visual Capacity in Driving -Revisited: New Empirical Results of an Old Idea in Vision in Vehicles II. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. (North-Holland) (1988), 317-314.
25. Salthouse, T.A., Hancock, H.E., Meinz, E.J. and Hambrick, D.Z. Interrelations of age, visual acuity, and cognitive functioning. J Gerontol Psychol Sci; 51B (1996), 317-330
26. Somervell, J., McCrickard, D.S., North, C. and Shukla, M. An evaluation of information visualization in attention-limited environments. In Proc. VISSYM 2002.
27. Suen, S.L. & Sen, L. Mobility Options for Seniors. In Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. Transportation Research Board (2004), 97-113.
28. Treisman, A.M. and Sato, S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16 (1990), 451-478.
29. Treisman, A. Selection for perception for selection for action: A reply to Van der Heijden. Visual Cognition, 3 (1996), 353-357.
30. Treisman, A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 353 (1998), 1295-1306. (Pubitemid 28398196)
31. Tufte, E. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1990.
32. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. The assessment of older drivers capabilities: A review of the literature. Interim report for the GM/US DOT project entitled: Improvement of Older Driver Safety through Self-Evaluation, Report No. UMTRI-98-24, 1998.
33. VICS Promotion Council, VICS Promotion Council Safety Committee Report on Information Display. (Chapter 2 "Safety" Group). Tokyo, Japan: VICS Promotion Council, 1993.
34. Wierwille, W.W., Antin, J.F., Dingus, T.A., and Hulse, M.C. Visual Attentional Demand of an In-Car Navigation Display System in Vision in Vehicles II. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. (North-Holland) (1988), 307-316.
35. Wierwille, W.W. Visual and manual demands of in-car controls and displays. In B. Peacock and W. Karwowski (Eds.), Automotive Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis: Washington, D.C. (1993), 299-320.
36. Zwaga, H. and Easterby, R.S. Developing effective symbols for public information. In Easterby, R. & Zwaga, H. (eds.). Information design: The design and evaluation of signs and printed material, J. Wiley & Sons (1984), 277-297.