'Sciencenet'-towards a global search and share engine for all scientific knowledge

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1734-1735

  Lütjohann, Dominic S ^a   Shah, Asmi H ^a   Christen, Michael P ^a   Richter, Florian ^a   Knese, Karsten ^a   Liebel, Urban ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; SEARCH ENGINE;

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; INTERNET; SEARCH ENGINE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79958083843     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr181     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ansorge, W.J. (2009) Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 195-203.
2. Balakrishnan, I. et al. (2003) Looking up data in P2P systems. Commun. ACM, 46, 43-48.
3. Ball, C.A. et al. (2004) Funding high-throughput data sharing. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 1179-1183.
4. Berners-Lee, T. (2006) Linked Data. W3C Design Issues. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Vol. 4, W3C, 1.
5. Birbeck, M. and Adida, B. (2008) RDFa Primer. W3C Notes. W3CWorking Group Note [14] October 2008.
6. Birney, E. et al. (2007) Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature, 447, 799-816.
7. Brin, S. and Page, L. (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput. Networks ISDN, 30, 107-117.
8. Campbell, P. (2009) Data's shameful neglect. Nature, 461, 145.
9. Falagas, M.E. et al. (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J., 22, 338-342.
10. Flicek, P. et al. (2011) Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res., 39 (Database issue), D800- D806.
11. Gstaiger, M. and Aebersold, R. (2009) Applying mass spectrometry-based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology. Nat. Rev. Genet., 10, 617-627.
12. Jensen, L.J. and Bork, P. (2010) Ontologies in quantitative biology: a basis for comparison, integration, and discovery. PLoS Biol., 8, e1000374.
13. Lagoze, C. et al. (2002) The making of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Library Hi Tech, Vol. 21, pp. 118-128.
14. Lewandowski, D. and Mayr, P. (2006) Exploring the academic invisible web. Libr. Hi Tech, 24, 529-539.
15. Liebel, U. et al. (2004) 'Harvester': a fast meta search engine of human protein resources. Bioinformatics, 20, 1962-1963.
16. McKiernan, G. (2005) E-profile: Scirus: For Scientific Information Only. Libr. Hi Tech News, 22, 18-25.
17. Metzker, M.L. (2010) Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 31-46.
18. Pepperkok, R. and Ellenberg, J. (2006) High-throughput fluorescence microscopy for systems biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 7, 690-696.
19. Schadt, E.E. et al. (2010) Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 647-657.
20. Schuler, G.D. et al. (1996) Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system. Methods Enzymol., 266, 141-162.
21. Swedlow, J.R. and Eliceiri, K.W. (2009) Open source bioimage informatics for cell biology. Trends Cell. Biol., 19, 656-660.
22. Szklarczyk, D. et al. (2010) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res., 39 (Database issue), D561-D568.
23. Valentin, F. et al. (2010) Fast and efficient searching of biological data resources-using EB-eye. Brief. Bioinform., 11, 375-384.