Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 8102-8108

  Dovern, Anna ^a   Fink, Gereon R ^a,b   Saliger, Jochen ^c   Karbe, Hans ^c   Koch, Iring ^d   Weiss, Peter H ^a,b  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c Neurological Rehabilitation Centre Godeshohe   (Germany)

^d RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOXEL BASED LESION SYMPTOM MAPPING; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIAS; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79958061223     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6585-10.2011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Dick F, Sereno MI, Knight RT, Dronkers NF (2003) Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 6:448-450.
2. Buxbaum LJ, Schwartz MF, Montgomery MW (1998) Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:617-643.
3. Buxbaum LJ, Haaland KY, Hallett M, Wheaton L, Heilman KM, Rodriguez A, Gonzalez Rothi LJ (2008) Treatment of limb apraxia: Moving forward to improve action. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87:149-161.
4. Clark MA, Merians AS, Kothari A, Poizner H, Macauley B, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Heilman KM (1994) Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 117:1093-1106.
5. Cohen A, Ivry RI, Keele SW (1990) Attention and structure in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 16:17-30.
6. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA (1962) The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 85:665-678.
7. De Renzi E, Pieczuro A, Vignolo LA (1968) Ideational apraxia: a quantitative study. Neuropsychologia 6:41-52.
8. De Renzi E, Faglioni P, Lodesani M, Vecchi A (1983) Performance of left brain-damaged patients on imitation of single movements and motor sequences. Frontal and parietal injured patients compared. Cortex 19:333-343.
9. Dienes Z, Berry D (1997) Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychon Bull Rev 4:3-23.
10. Dovern A, Fink GR, Weiss PH (2011) How to diagnose and treat limb apraxia. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. Advance online publication. Retrieved May 7, 2011. PMID: 21480158.
11. Eimer M, Goschke T, Schlaghecken F, Stürmer B (1996) Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 22:970-987.
12. Faglioni P, Basso A, Botti C, Aglioti S, Saetti C (1990) Gesture learning and apraxia. In: Motor representation and control (Jeannerod M, ed), pp 837-856. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
13. GoldenbergG (1996) Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 61:176-180.
14. Goldenberg G (2003) Pantomime of object use: a challenge to cerebral localization of cognitive function. Neuroimage 20:S101-S106.
15. Goldenberg G (2008) Apraxia. In: Neuropsychology and behavioral neurology (Goldenberg G, Miller BL, eds), pp 323-338. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Goldenberg G, Karnath HO (2006) The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. J Neurosci 26:6282-6287.
17. Goldenberg G, Hentze S, Hermsdörfer J (2004) The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia. Neurology 63:1863-1867.
18. Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1992) Motor sequencing with left hemisphere damage. Are some cognitive deficits specific to limb apraxia? Brain 115:857-874.
19. Hartmann K, Goldenberg G, Daumüller M, Hermsdörfer J (2005) It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia 43:625-637.
20. Heilman KM, Schwartz HD, Geschwind N (1975) Defective motor learning in ideomotor apraxia. Neurology 25:1018-1020.
21. Hermsdörfer J, Goldenberg G, Wachsmuth C, Conrad B, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Bartenstein P, Schwaiger M, Boecker H (2001) Cortical correlates of gesture processing: clues to the cerebral mechanisms underlying apraxia during the imitation of meaningless gestures. Neuroimage 14: 149-161.
22. Hermsdörfer J, Terlinden G, Mühlau M, Goldenberg G, Wohlschläger AM (2007) Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 36:T109-T118.
23. Hoffmann J, Koch I (1998) Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In: Handbook of implicit learning (Stadler MA, Frensch PA, eds), pp 161-199. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
24. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM (2002) The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:14518-14523.
25. Keele SW, Ivry R, Mayr U, Hazeltine E, Heuer H (2003) The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychol Rev 110:316-339.
26. Koch I, Reverberi C, Rumiati RI (2006) Learning hierarchically structured action sequences is unaffected by prefrontal-cortex lesion. Exp Brain Res 175:667-675.
27. Leiguarda RC, Marsden CD (2000) Limb apraxias. Higher-order disorders of sensorimotor integration. Brain 123:860-879.
28. Lyle RC (1981) A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 4: 483-492.
29. Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom (1978) Aids to examination of the peripheral nervous system: memorandum No 45. Palo Alto, CA: Pedragon House.
30. Motomura N, Seo T, Asaba H, Sakai T (1989) Motor learning in ideomotor apraxia. Int J Neurosci 47:125-129.
31. Mühlau M, Hermsdörfer J, Goldenberg G, Wohlschläger AM, Castrop F, Stahl R, Röttinger M, Erhard P, Haslinger B, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Conrad B, Boecker H (2005) Left inferior parietal dominance in gesture imitation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 43:1086-1098.
32. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol 19:1-32.
33. Ohbayashi M, Ohki K, Miyashita Y (2003) Conversion of working memory to motor sequence in the monkey premotor cortex. Science 301:233-236.
34. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113.
35. Orrell AJ, Eves FF, Masters RS, MacMahon KM (2007) Implicit sequence learning processes after unilateral stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil 17: 335-354.
36. Pohl PS, McDowd JM, Filion D, Richards LG, Stiers W (2006) Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke. Clin Rehabil 20:246-253.
37. Poizner H, Mack L, Verfaellie M, Rothi LJ, Heilman KM (1990) Threedimensional computergraphic analysis of apraxia. Neural representations of learned movement. Brain 113:85-101.
38. Randerath J, Goldenberg G, Spijkers W, Li Y, Hermsdörfer J (2010) Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. Neuroimage 53:171-180.
39. Rankin J (1957) Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 2:200-215.
40. Reed J, Johnson P (1994) Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: determining what is learned about sequence structure. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20:585-594.
41. Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilha L (2007) Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1081-1088.
42. Rothi LJ, Heilman KM (1984) Acquisition and retention of gestures by apraxic patients. Brain Cogn 3:426-437.
43. Rothi LJG, Heilman KM (1997) Introduction to limb apraxia. In: Apraxia: the neuropsychology of action (Rothi LJG, Heilman KM, eds), pp 1-6. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
44. Rumiati RI, Weiss PH, Shallice T, Ottoboni G, Noth J, Zilles K, Fink GR (2004) Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. Neuroimage 21:1224-1231.
45. Rüsseler J, Rösler F (2000) Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104:45-67.
46. Schellig D (1997) Block-tapping-test. Frankfurt, Germany: Swets Test Services.
47. Schluter ND, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE, Mills KR (1998) Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 121:785-799.
48. Schluter ND, Krams M, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE (2001) Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions. Neuropsychologia 39:105-113.
49. Stadler W, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY, Springer A, Graf M, Prinz W (2011) Predicting and memorizing observed action: differential premotor cortex involvement. Hum Brain Mapp 32:677-687.
50. Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, Hauert CA, Vuilleumier P (2010) Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133:880-894.
51. Weiss PH, Rahbari NN, Hesse MD, Fink GR (2008) Deficient sequencing of pantomimes in apraxia. Neurology 70:834-840.
52. Zirngibl C, Koch I (2002) The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Exp Psychol 49:153-162.