Complementarity in bistable perception

Recasting Reality: Wolfgang Pauli's Philosophical Ideas and Contemporary Science

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 135-150

  Atmanspacher, Harald ^a   Filk, Thomas ^b   Römer, Hartmann ^c  

^a Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology   (Germany)

^b Parmenides Center for the Study of Thinking   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958059766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982a): Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 49, 1804-1807.
2. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982b): Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment. A new violation of Bell's inequalities. Physical Review Letters 49, 91-94.
3. Atmanspacher, H., Bach, M., Filk, J., Kornmeier, J. and Römer, H. (2008): Cognitive time scales in a Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception. Manuscript available at www.igpp. de/english/tda/pdf/neckerzeno.pdf.
4. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. and Römer, H. (2004): Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics 90, 33-40.
5. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. and Römer, H. (2006): Weak quantum theory: Formal framework and selected applications. In: Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A., and Nieuwenhuizen, T. M. (eds.), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations 3. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 34-46.
6. Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H. and Walach, H. (2002): Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics 32, 379-406.
7. Bell, J. S. (1966): On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447-452.
8. Blake, R. and Logothetis, N. K. (2001): Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 1-11.
9. Brascamp, J. W., Ee, R.van, Pestman, W. R. and Berg, A. V. van den (2005): Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5, 287-298.
10. Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B. and Pettigrew, J. D. (2005): Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Current Biology 15, R412-R413.
11. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935): Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review 47, 777-780.
12. Franck, G. and Atmanspacher, H. (2008): A proposed relation between intensity of presence and duration of nowness. This volume.
13. James, W. (1890a): The Principles of Psychology. Volume One. Holt, New York.
14. James, W. (1890b): The Principles of Psychology. Volume Two. Holt, New York.
15. Kornmeier, J., Ehm, W., Bigalke, H. and Bach, M. (2007): Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: How interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. Psychophysiology 44, 552-560.
16. Kruse, P. and Stadler, M. (eds.) (1995): Ambiguity in Mind and Nature: Multistable Cognitive Phenomena. Springer, Berlin.
17. Leggett, A. J. and Garg, A. (1985): Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? Physical Review Letters 54, 857-860.
18. Long, G. M. and Toppino, T. C. (2004): Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130, 748-768.
19. Mahler, G. (1994): Temporal Bell inequalities: A journey to the limits of "consistent histories". In: Atmanspacher, H. and Dalenoort, G. J. (eds.), Inside Versus Outside. Endo-and Exo-Concepts of Observation and Knowledge in Physics, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 195-205.
20. Meng, M. and Tong, F. (2004): Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4, 539-551.
21. Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977): The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 18, 756-763.
22. Pöppel, E. (1997): A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 1, 56-61.
23. Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1983) Perception of quantum systems. In: Merwe, A. van der (ed.), Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology. Plenum, New York, pp. 457-467.