In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 585-590

  Ural, Çağrı ^a   Burgaz, Yavuz ^b   Saraç, Duygu ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

All ceramic; CAD CAM; Marginal discrepancy; Marginal fit

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CEREC; EMPRESS 2; GLASS; IN CERAM; IN-CERAM; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN CEMENT; WAX;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HEAT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; GLASS; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; LITHIUM COMPOUNDS; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; WAXES;

EID: 79958040173     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 747-753.
2. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117: 715-720.
3. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CADCAM- generated ceramic inlays: A four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1171-1181.
4. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 357-364.
5. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR. Gingival margins for crowns: A review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 636-642.
6. Shiratsuchi H, Komine F, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Influence of finish line design on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 237-242.
7. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 459-464.
8. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 478-484.
9. Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 529-535.
10. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 346-355.
11. Goldin EB, Boyd NW 3rd, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 143-147.
12. McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-111.
13. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM allceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 244-248.
14. Holden JE, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Clark EA. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 645-648.
15. Scotti R, Catapano S, D'Elia A. A clinical evaluation of In-Ceram crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 320-323.
16. Grey NJ, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent 1993; 21: 47-51.
17. Rosenstiel S, Land M, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St Louis: Mosby, 1995.
18. Suarez MJ, Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Pradies G, Lozano JF. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 229-232.
19. Cho L, Choi J, Yi YJ, Park CJ. Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 554-560.
20. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 582-593.
21. Sorensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 16-22.
22. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental allceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 587-592.
23. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 405-408.
24. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fixed partial dentures. Eur J Dent 2007; 1: 25-30.
25. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: An in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 250-257.
26. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 585-590.
27. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 181-186.
28. Campbell SD, Pelletier LB, Pober RL, Giordano RA. Dimensional and formation analysis of a restorative ceramic and how it works. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 332-340.
29. Gavelis J, Morency J, Riley E, Sozio R. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 1-7.
30. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 440-447.