Scenario simulation of urban land use allocation and scheme evaluation based on GIS: A case study of Taicang City

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1121-1129

  Qin, Xianhong ^a,b,c,d   Duan, Xuejun ^a   Yang, Jian ^d  

^a NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c Jiangsu Engineering Consulting Center   (China)

^d NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

GIS; Land use arrangement; Scenario simulation; Scheme evaluation; Taicang City

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FLOOD; GEOLOGICAL HAZARD; GIS; LAND USE CHANGE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA; JIANGSU; SUZHOU;

EID: 79958023913     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chen Bingjian, Pan Haixiao. Method on optimizing spatial layout of city. Urban Planning Review, 1991, (4): 12-16.
2. Chen Yansong, Wang Wei. Alternative view on the reform of urban comprehensive plan. City Planning Review, 2004, 28(12): 15-19.
3. Sinton D. The user's guide to IMGRID: An information manipulation system for grid cell structures. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Landscape Architecture, Harvard University, 1997.
4. Landis L D. The California urban future model: A new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning B, 1994, 21(4): 399-420.
5. Landis L D. Imaging land use futures: Applying the California urban future model. Journal of American Planning Association, 1994, 61(4): 438-457.
6. Waddell P. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environment planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 2002, 68(3): 297-313.
7. Klosterman R. The what-if? Collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1999, 26(3): 393-408.
8. Harris B. Beyond geographic information systems: Computers and the planning professional. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1989, 55(1): 85-92.
9. Clarke K C, Gaydos L, Hoppen S. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1997, 24(2): 247-261.
10. Reilly J. The New Jersey (USA) Growth allocation model: development, evaluation and extension//Geertman S, Stillwell J//Planning Support Systems in Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 373-390.
11. Yeh A G O, Song Xiaodong, Niu Xinyi et al. Geographic Information and Planning Support System. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
12. Niu Xinyi, Song Xiaodong, Gao Xiaoyu et al. Land use scenarios: An approach for urban master plans formulation and evaluation. Urban Planning Forum, 2008, (4): 64-69.
13. Long Ying. Planning Support System Theory and Practice. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007.
14. Chen Shupeng. Urbanization and Urban Geographic System. Beijing: Science Press, 1999.
15. Qin Xianhong, Duan Xuejun, Li Hui et al. Urban land expansion simulation model based on SD and CA: A case study of Nantong City. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 439-444.
16. Wan Yanhua. Discuss on growth mechanism of city spatial structure: A case study of Jinjiang City. Urban Planning Review, 1996, (3): 27-29.
17. Fu Zeqiang, Cai Yunlong, Yang Youxiao et al. Research on the relationship of cultivated land change and food security in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2001, 16(4): 313-319.
18. Huang Shuli. Ecological Landuse Planning. Taipei: CHAN'S ARCH-PUBLISHING CO., LTD., 2002.
19. Frederick Steiner, John Blair. A watershed at a watershed: The potential for environmentally sensitive area protection in the upper. San Pedro Drainage Basin, 2000, 49: 129-148.
20. Wang Bo, Zhao Haixia, Huang Tiansong. Research on delimitation of environmentally sensitive area in Suzhou City. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(1): 170-176.
21. Cao Xingrong. Modernized city construction and natural disasters. Beijing City Planning & Construction Review, 2003, (3): 58-59.