Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries?

Nepalese journal of ophthalmology : a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of the Nepal Ophthalmic Society : NEPJOPH

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 95-100

  Singh, S K ^a   Winter, I ^b   Surin, L ^b  

^a Biratnagar Eye Hospital   (Nepal)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPAL; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

CATARACT; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPAL; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 79958019026     PISSN: 20726805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682     Document Type: Article

References (0)