Silent derogation and perceptions of deceptiveness: Does communicating nonverbal disbelief during an opponent's speech affect perceptions of debaters’ veracity?

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 334-344

  Seiter, John S ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958010218     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090109384814     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson, D. E., Ansfield, M. E., and DePaulo, B. M., 1999. “ Love's best habit: Deception in the context of relationships ”. In The social context of nonverbal behavior: Studies in emotion and social interaction, Edited by: Philippot, P., and Feldman, R., 372–409. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Beatty, M. J., and Kruger, M. W., 1978. The effects of heckling on speaker credibility and attitude change. Communication Quarterly, 26: 46–50.
3. Buller, D. B., and Burgoon, J. K., 1994. “ Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication ”. In Strategic interpersonal communication, Edited by: Daly, J. A., and Wiemann, J. M., 191–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Buller, D. B., and Burgoon, J. K., 1996. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6: 203–242.
5. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A. S., and Rockwell, P., 1994. Interpersonal Deception: V. accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61: 303–325.
6. Burton, G., 2000. USU classes discern no clear winner in presidential debate. The Salt Lake Tribune, 260 October 4: A14
7. Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E., 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 116–131.
8. Camden, C., Motley, M. M., and Wilson, A., 1984. White lies in interpersonal communication. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48: 309–325.
9. Carlson, M., 2000. Stretches and sighs. Time, 156 October 16: 53
10. Chambliss, C. A., and Feeny, N., 1992. Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perception of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75: 1235–1241.
11. Cole, T., Lying to the one you love: The use of deception in romantic relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Acapulco. June.
12. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., and Epstein, J. A., 1996. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 979–995.
13. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., and Lassiter, G. D., 1985. “ Deceiving and detecting deceit ”. In The self and social life, Edited by: Schlenker, B. R., 323–370. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Feinsilber, M., 1996. Be nice, act grown-up: Coaches share their wisdom with rivals. The Chattanooga Times, 127(253) October 5: A3
15. Festinger, L., 1957. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7: 117–140.
16. Finkenauer, C., and Hazam, H., 2000. Disclosure and secrecy in marriage: Do both contribute to marital satisfaction?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17: 245–263.
17. Gass, R. H., and Seiter, J. S., 1999. Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Gerson, M. J., 1998. Who will vote?. US News and World Report, 125 October 12: 20–22.
19. Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life, Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
20. Hampson, R., 2000. Out of 11 in focus group, Bush loses one to Gore: Still Democrat was rated both good, bad. USA Today, October 4: 6A
21. Knapp, M. L., Hart, P. R., and Dennis, H. S., 1974. An explanation of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1: 15–29.
22. Kraus, R. M., 1981. “ Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviors ”. In Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Edited by: Higgins, E.T., Herman, C. P., and Zanna, M. P., Vol. 1, 323–341. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Kraut, R. E., 1980. Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30: 209–216.
24. LaFrance, M., 1992. Gender and interruption: Individual infraction or violation of the social order?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16: 497–512.
25. Leathers, D. G., 1997. Successful nonverbal communication: principles and applications, 3rd ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26. McCornack, S. A., and Levine, T. R., 1990. When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57: 219–230.
27. Mercer, M., 1999. The bungee president. The Tampa Tribune, September 17: 15
28. Millar, K. U., and Tesser, A., 1988. Deceptive behavior in social relationships: A consequence of violated expectations. Journal of Psychology, 122: 263–273.
29. Millar, M. G., and Millar, K. U., 1998. The effects of suspicion on the recall of cues used to make veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 11: 57–64.
30. 1998. Nothing to Lose: Bill Clinton prepares grand jury testimony. Newsweek, 132 August 24: 18–19.
31. Nyberg, D., 1993. The varnished truth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. O'Hair, H. D., and Cody, M. J., 1994. “ Deception ”. In The dark side of interpersonal communication, Edited by: Cupach, W. R., and Spitzberg, B. H., 180–213. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pfau, M., and Kang, J. G., 1991. The impact of relational messages on candidate influence in televised political debates. Communication Studies, 42: 114–128.
34. Robinson, L. F., and Reis, H. T., 1989. The effects of interruption, gender, and status on interpersonal perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13: 141–153.
35. Rosenberg, H., 1996. After all is said, at least there's still a choice. Los Angeles Times, October, 8: 1 [Home Edition].
36. Schlenker, B. R., 1980. Impression management, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. Schrott, P. R., and Lanoue, D.J., 1992. How to win a televised debate: candidate strategies and voter response in Germany, 1972–87. British Journal of Political Science, 22: 445–467.
38. Seiter, J. S., 1999. Does communicating nonverbal disagreement during an opponent's speech affect the credibility of the debater in the background?. Psychological Reports, 84: 855–861.
39. Seiter, J. S., Abraham, J. A., and Nakagama, B. T., 1998. Split-screen versus single-screen formats in televised debates: Does access to an opponent's nonverbal behaviors affect viewers’ perceptions of a speaker's credibility?. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86: 491–497.
40. Sigelman, L., and Sigelman, C. K., 1984. Judgments of the Carter-Reagan debate: the eyes of the beholders. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 48: 624–628.
41. Snyder, M., 1979. “ Self-monitoring processes ”. In Advances in experimental and social psychology, Edited by: Berkowitz, L., Vol. 12, 85–128. New York: Academic Press.
42. Stiff, J. G., Kim, H. J., and Ramesh, C., 1992. Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19: 326–345.
43. Tedeschi, J. T., and Reiss, M., 1981. “ Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research ”. In Impression management theory and social psychological research, Edited by: Tedeschi, J. T., 3–22. New York: Academic Press.
44. Zuckerman, M., and Driver, R. E., 1985. “ Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception ”. In Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior, Edited by: Siegman, A. W., and Feldstein, S., 129–147. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.