Continuous mobility surveys: The state of practice

Transport Reviews

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 293-312

  de Dios Ortúzar, Juan ^a   Armoogum, Jimmy ^b   Madre, Jean Loup ^b   Potier, Françoise ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; MOBILITY; PANEL DATA; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 79958003517     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.510224     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ampt, E. S. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2004) On best practice in continuous large-scale mobility surveys. Transport Reviews, 24, pp. 337-363.
2. Ampt, E. S., Ortúzar, J. de D. and Richardson, A. J. (2009) Large-scale ongoing mobility surveys: the state of practice, in: P. Bonnel, M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin, J. Zmud and J.-L. Madre (Eds) Transport Survey Methods: Keeping Up with a Changing World, pp. 505-532. (Bingley: Emerald).
3. Anderson, T., Abeywardana, V., Pickering, K. and Tipping, S. (2008) National Travel Survey 2007. Technical Report (London: UK Department of Transport, National Centre for Social Research).
4. Axhausen, K. W., Löchl, M., Schlich, R., Buhl, T. and Widmer, P. (2007) Fatigue in long-duration travel diaries. Transportation, 34, pp. 143-160.
5. Axhausen, K. W., Zimmermann, A., Schönfelder, S., Rindsfüser, G. and Haupt, T. (2002) Observing the rhythms of daily life: a six-week travel diary. Transportation, 29, pp. 95-124.
6. Baanders, B. and Slootman, K. (1982) A panel for longitudinal research into travel behavior, in: S. Carpenter and P. M. Jones (Eds) Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, pp. 450-461. (Aldershot: Gower).
7. Battellino, H. and Peachman, J. (2003) The joys and tribulations of a continuous survey, in: P. R. Stopher and P. M. Jones (Eds) Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, pp. 49-68. (Amsterdam: Pergamon).
8. BGC (1991) Het Longitudinaal Verplaatsingsonderzoek-Kenmerken en Gebruik [The longitudinal travel survey - Characteristics and use]. Bureau Goudappel Coffeng, Projektbureau IVVS. Deventer (in Dutch).
9. Bradley, M. and Zmud, J. (2006) Validating willingness to pay estimates for toll facilities through panel survey methods. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, 16-20 August 2006.
10. Cherchi, E., Cirillo, C. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2009) A mixed logit choice model for panel data: accounting for different correlation over time periods. Paper presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Harrogate, UK, 29 March-1 April 2009.
11. Christensen, L. (2006) Possible explanations for an increasing share of no-trip respondents in the continuous Danish travel survey, in: P. R. Stopher and C. Stecher (Eds) Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, pp. 303-316. (Oxford: Elsevier).
12. Cochran, W. G. (1977) Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn (New York: John Wiley).
13. Golob, T. F., Kitamura, R. and Long, L. (Eds) (1997) Panels for Transportation Planning-Methods and Applications (New York: Academic Press).
14. Goulias, K. G., Kilgren, N. and Kim, T. (2003) A decade of longitudinal travel behaviour observation in the Puget Sound region: sample composition, summary statistics and a selection of first order findings. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 10-15 August 2003.
15. Hill, D., Munday, A. and Henstridge, J. (2004) PARTS: giving the whole transport picture. Paper presented at the Australian Market and Social Research Society Seminar, Sydney, Australian, 11 August 2004.
16. Hubert J.-P. (2009) Dans les grandes agglomérations, la mobilité quotidienne des habitants diminue, et elle augmente ailleurs [Daily mobility is decreasing for the inhabitants of large urban areas, while it is increasing elsewhere]. INSEE Première 1252, National Institute of Statistics, Paris (in French).
17. Kilgren, N. (1998) Overview of the Puget Sound transportation panel survey (1989-1997). Transportation Panel Survey (Wave7) (Seattle: Puget Sound Regional Council). Available at: http://www.psrc.org (accessed 6 August 1998).
18. Lee-Gosselin, M. E. H. (2005) A data collection strategy for perceived and observed flexibility in the spatio-temporal organisation of household activities and associated travel, in: H. J. P. Timmermans (Ed.) Progress in Activity-Based Analysis, pp. 355-371. (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
19. Lee-Gosselin, M. E. H. and Miranda-Moreno, L. (2009) What is different about urban activities of those with access to ICTs? Some early evidence from Québec, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, pp. 104-114.
20. Madre, J.-L. (2005) Continuous surveys. Paper presented at the Minutes of COST355 Seminar, Arcueil, France, 20 May 2005.
21. Miranda-Moreno, L. and Lee-Gosselin, M. E. H. (2008) A week in the life of baby boomers: how do they see the spatial-temporal organization of their activities and travel? Transportation, 35, pp. 629-653.
22. Muñoz, J. C., Ortúzar, J. de D. and Gschwender, A. (2009) Transantiago: the fall and rise of a radical public transport intervention, in: W. Saleh and G. Sammer (Eds) Travel Demand Management and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility, pp. 151-172 (Farnham: Ashgate).
23. Murakami, E. and Ulberg, C. (1997) The Puget Sound transportation panel, in: T. Golob, R. Kitamura and L. Long (Eds) Panels for Transportation Planning, Methods and Applications, pp. 159-192. (New York: Academic Press).
24. Murakami, E. and Watterson, W. T. (1990) Developing a household travel panel survey for the Puget Sound region. Transportation Research Record, 1285, pp. 40-46.
25. Richardson, A. J. and Ampt, E. S. (1993) The Victoria Integrated Travel, Activities and Land-use Toolkit (Vital Working Paper VWP93/1) (Melbourne: Transport Research Centre).
26. Richardson, A. J., Ampt, E. S. and Meyburg, A. H. (1995) Survey Methods for Transport Planning (Melbourne: Eucalyptus Press).
27. Ruiz, T. (2004) Panel survey approach to measuring season ticket use. Journal of Public Transportation, 7, pp. 85-100.
28. Ruiz, T., Timmermans, H. and Polak, J. W. (2008) Analysis of attrition and reported immobility in the Madrid-Barcelona Corridor panel survey. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, Annecy, France, 25-31 May 2008.
29. Stopher, P. R. (2009) Collecting and processing data from mobile technologies, in: P. Bonnel, M. Lee-Gosselin, J. Zmud and J.-L. Madre (Eds) Travel Survey Methods: Keeping Up with a Changing World, pp. 361-391. (Bingley: Emerald).
30. Stopher P. R., Clifford, E. and Halling, B. (2008) Evaluating a voluntary travel behaviour change by means of a 3-year GPS panel. Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Travel Demand Management (TDM 2008), Vienna, Austria, 16-18 July 2008.
31. Stopher, P. R., Clifford, E., Swann, N. and Zhang, Y. (2009) Evaluating travel behaviour changes-suggested guidelines and case studies. Transport Policy, 16, pp. 315-324.
32. Stopher, P. R., Kockelman, K., Greaves, S. P. and Clifford, E. (2008) Reducing burden and sample sizes in multiday household travel surveys. Transportation Research Record, 2064, pp. 12-18.
33. Stopher, P. R. and Swann, N. (2008) Six-wave odometer panel for evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change programs. Transportation Research Record, 2049, pp. 119-127.
34. Stopher, P. R., Wilmot, C. G., Stecher, C. and Alsnih, R. (2006) Household travel surveys: proposed standard and guidelines, in: P. R. Stopher and C. Stecher (Eds) Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, pp. 19-74. (Oxford: Elsevier).
35. Stopher, P. R., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. and Halling, B. (2009). Results of an evaluation of TravelSmart in South Australia. Paper presented at the 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, Auckland, New Zealand, 29 September-1 October 2009.
36. Tourangeau, R., Zimowski, M. and Ghadialy, R. (1997) An Introduction to Panel Surveys in Transportation Studies (Chicago: NORC).
37. Van Heukelingen, C. (2005) Setting-up a new travel survey concept without causing a trend break. Paper presented at the ECTRI Young Researchers' Seminar, The Hague, Holland, 10-13 May 2005.
38. Yáñez, M. F., Cherchi, E., Heydecker, B. G. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010) On the treatment of repeated observations in panel data: efficiency of mixed logit parameter estimates. Network and Spatial Economics, 10. doi: 10.1007/s11067-010-9143-6
39. Yáñez, M. F., Cherchi, E. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2009) Inertia and shock effects on mode choice panel data: implications of the Transantiago implementation. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur, India. 13-18 December 2009.
40. Yáñez, M. F., Mansilla, P. and Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010) The Santiago panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago. Transportation, 37, pp. 125-149.
41. Zumkeller, D. (2009) The dynamics of change: latest results from the German mobility panel. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur, India. 13-18 December 2009.
42. Zumkeller, D., Chlond, B. and Manz, W. (2004) Infrastructure development in Germany under stagnating demand conditions: a new paradigm? Transportation Research Record, 1984, pp. 121-128.
43. Zumkeller D., Madre, J.-L., Chlond, B. and Armoogum, J. (2006) Panel surveys, in: P. R. Stopher and C. Stecher (Eds) Travel Survey Methods: Quality and Future Directions, pp. 363-398. (Oxford: Elsevier).
44. Zumkeller, D. and Ottmann, P. (2009) Moving from cross-sectional to continuous surveying: synthesis of a workshop, in: P. Bonnel, M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin, J. Zmud and J.-L. Madre (Eds) Transport Survey Methods: Keeping Up with a Changing World, pp. 533-539 (Bingley: Emerald).