Biocompatibility evaluation of 3 facial silicone elastomers

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 837-840

  França, Diurianne Caroline Campos ^a   De Castro, Alvimar Lima ^a   Soubhia, Ana Maria Pires ^a   Tucci, Renata ^a   De Aguiar, Sandra Maria Herondina Coelho Ávila ^a   Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; connective tissue; Facial silicone; inflammation

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; SILASTIC;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CYTOLOGY; EOSINOPHIL; GIANT CELL; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; MESODERM; PATHOLOGY; RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; EOSINOPHILS; GIANT CELLS; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS; MESODERM; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 79958000707     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820f367b     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Guiotti AM, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM. Evaluation of the Shore A hardness of silicone for facial prosthesis as to the effect of storage period and chemical disinfection. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:323-327
2. dos Santos DM, Goiato MC, Sinhoreti MA, et al. Color stability of polymers for facial prosthesis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:54-58
3. Lewis DH, Castleberry DJ. An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:426-432
4. Lontz JF. State-of-the-art materials used for maxillofacial prosthetic reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 1999;34:307-325
5. Rommerdale EH. Requisites for extraoral maxillofacial materials of the third millennium. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1992;5:42-64
6. Raval P, Schaaf NG. Custom fabricated silicone rubber implants for tissue augmentationVa review. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:432-434
7. Barnhart GW. A new material and technic in the art of somato-prosthesis. J Dent Res 1960;39:836-844
8. Bellamy K, Limbert G, Waters MG, et al. An elastomeric material for facial prostheses: Synthesis, experimental and numerical testing aspects. Biomaterials 2003;24:5061-5066 (Pubitemid 37237635)
9. Ozbas H, Yaltirik M, Bilgic B, et al. Reactions of connective tissue to compomers, composite and amalgam root-end filling materials. Int Endod J 2003;36:281-287 (Pubitemid 37255733)
10. Zmener O. Tissue response to a new methacrylate-based root canal sealer: Preliminary observations in the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 2004;30:348-351 (Pubitemid 38658286)
11. Polyzois GL, Hensten-Pettersen A. Physical-mechanical and cytotoxic properties of room temperature vulcanizing silicone prosthetic elastomers. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:245-248 (Pubitemid 128513701)
12. Murata H, Hong G, Hamada T, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials and the influence of frequency and temperature on their properties. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:369-374 (Pubitemid 37162347)
13. Mortellaro C, Garagiola U, Lucchina AG, et al. The use of silicon elastomer in maxillofacial rehabilitation as a substitute for or in conjunction with resins. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:152-162 (Pubitemid 44383864)
14. Kaauzny JJ, Jówicki W, Wivniewska H. Histological biocompatibility of new, non-absorbable glaucoma deep sclerectomy implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:403-409 (Pubitemid 46685107)
15. Cheng X, Zou D, Wu J, et al. Experimental study of novel injectable nucleus pulposus prostheses implant. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2009;23:670-676
16. John KR. Biocompatibility of dental materials. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:747-760
17. Bal BT, YNlmaz H, AydNn C, et al. Histopathologic study of rat connective tissue responses to maxillofacial silicone elastomers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20:1901-1907
18. Chauvel-Lebret DJ, Pellen-Mussi P, Auroy P, et al. Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of various elastomers. Biomaterials 1999;20:291-299 (Pubitemid 29047974)
19. Den Braber ET, Ruijter JE, Jansen JA. The effect of a subcutaneous silicone rubber implant with shallow surface microgrooves on the surrounding tissues in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:539-547 (Pubitemid 27514862)
20. Parker JATC, Walboomers XF, Von Den Hoff JW, et al. Soft-tissue response to silicone and poly-L-lactic acid implants with a periodic or random surface micropattern. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:91-98 (Pubitemid 34650261)
21. Tang L, Eaton JW. Inflammatory responses to biomaterials. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:466-471
22. Ustundag E, Boyaci Z, Keskin G, et al. Soft tissue response of the larynx to silicone, Gore-Tex, and irradiated cartilage implants. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1009-1014 (Pubitemid 40776992)
23. Christenson EM, Dadsetan M, Hiltner A. Biostability and macrophage-mediated foreign body reaction of silicone-modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:141-155 (Pubitemid 40995528)
24. Eppley BL. Alloplastic implantation. Plast Reconst Sur 1999;104: 1761-1785
25. van Rossum M, Vooijs DP, Walboomers XF, et al. The influence of a PHI-5Yloaded silicone membrane, on cutaneous wound healing in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:1449-1456 (Pubitemid 46999016)
26. Coombs DW, Colburn RW, DeLeo JA, et al. Comparative histopathology of epidural hydrogel and silicone elastomer catheters following 30 and 180 days implant in the ewe. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:388-395 (Pubitemid 24156138)
27. Polyzois GL, Hensten-Pettersen A, Kullmann A. An assessment of the physical properties and biocompatibility of three silicone elastomers. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:500-504