Validation of algorithm to identify American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant women at risk from pandemic H1N1 influenza

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 204, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Penman Aguilar, Ana ^a,c   Tucker, Myra J ^a   Groom, Amy V ^a,b   Reilley, Brigg A ^b   Klepacki, Stephanie ^b   Cullen, Theresa ^b   Gebremariam, Cynthia ^b   Redd, John T ^b  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^b INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

American Indian; disease surveillance; H1N1; influenza; pregnancy; special populations

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EPIDEMIC; GOLD STANDARD; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; INFLUENZA A (H1N1); PANDEMIC INFLUENZA; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 79957998881     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. D.J. Jamieson, M.A. Honein, and S.A. Rasmussen H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA Lancet 374 2009 451 458
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deaths related to 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) among American Indian/Alaska Natives12 states, 2009 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58 2009 1341 1344
3. Indian Health Service Indian Health Service introduction http://www.ihs.gov/PublicInfo/PublicAffairs/Welcome-Info/IHSintro.asp Accessed April 14, 2011
4. Groom A, Redd J, Jim C, Cullen T, Layne L, Cheek J. Use of an electronic health record system to guide 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) response in the Indian Health Service. Presented at: 44th National Immunization Conference; April 19-22, 2010; Atlanta, GA.
5. US Office of Management and Budget Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Related Materials http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/index-gpra Accessed Sept. 20, 2010
6. J.M. Manson, B. McFarland, and S. Weiss Use of an automated database to evaluate markers for early detection of pregnancy Am J Epidemiol 154 2001 180 187 (Pubitemid 32643135)
7. M.C. Hornbrook, E.P. Whitlock, and C.J. Berg Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system Health Serv Res 42 2007 908 927 (Pubitemid 46398789)
8. J.R. Ehrenkranz Home and point-of-care pregnancy tests: a review of the technology Epidemiology 13 2002 S15 S18
9. W. Koller, A. Blacky, C. Bauer, H. Mandl, and K.P. Adlassnig Electronic surveillance of healthcare-associated infections with MONI-ICUa clinical breakthrough compared to conventional surveillance systems Stud Health Technol Inform 160 2010 432 436
10. C. Wilson, L. Susan, A. Lynch, R. Saria, and D. Peterson Patients with diagnosed diabetes mellitus can be accurately identified in an Indian Health Service patient registration database Public Health Rep 116 2001 45 50 (Pubitemid 32822080)
11. A.F. Eichler, and E.B. Lamont Utility of administrative claims data for the study of brain metastases: a validation study J Neurooncol 95 2009 427 431
12. M.T. Lydon-Rochelle, V.L. Holt, and V. Crdenas The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 2005 125 134 (Pubitemid 41001326)
13. M.T. Lydon-Rochelle, V.L. Holt, and J.C. Nelson Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 19 2005 460 471 (Pubitemid 41693363)
14. S.E. Geller, S. Ahmed, M.L. Brown, S.M. Cox, D. Rosenberg, and S.J. Kilpatrick International Classification of Diseases-9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 2004 1629 1633
15. Association of American Medical Colleges Health care reform http://www.aamc.org/reform/summary/workforce.pdf Accessed Sept. 24, 2010