Task-driven learning of spatial combinations of visual features

IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

Volumn 2005-September, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Jodogne, Sébastien ^a   Scalzo, Fabien ^a   Piater, Justus H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

CLOSED LOOP LEARNING; CONTROL PROBLEMS; DISCRIMINATIVE POWER; PERCEPTUAL ALIASING; POINT FEATURES; SPATIAL COMBINATIONS; VISUAL FEATURE; VISUAL STIMULUS;

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

EID: 79957989689     PISSN: 21607508     EISSN: 21607516     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.539     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. R. Bellman. Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, 1957.
2. D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis. Neuro-Dynamic Programming. Athena Scientific, 1996.
3. J. Coelho, J.H. Piater, and R. Grupen. Developing haptic and visual perceptual categories for reaching and grasping with a humanoid robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, special issue on Humanoid Robots, 37(2-3):195-218, 2001.
4. D. Ernst, P. Geurts, and L. Wehenkel. Iteratively extending time horizon reinforcement learning. In Proc. of the 14th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 96-107, Dubrovnik, 2003.
5. E.J. Gibson and E.S. Spelke. The development of perception. Handbook of Child Psychology Vol. III: Cognitive Development, chapter 1, pages 2-76. Wiley, 4th edition, 1983.
6. V. Gouet and N. Boujemaa. Object-based queries using color points of interest. In IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, pages 30-36, Kauai, 2001.
7. A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty, and P. J. Flynn. Data clustering: a review. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(3):264-323, 1999.
8. S. Jodogne and J.H. Piater. Reinforcement learning of perceptual classes using Q learning updates. Proc. of the 23rd IASTED International Multi-Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 445-450, Innsbruck, 2005.
9. L.P. Kaelbling, M.L. Littman, and A.R. Cassandra. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2):99-134, 1998.
10. R.A. McCallum. Reinforcement Learning with Selective Perception and Hidden State. PhD thesis, University of Rochester, New York, 1996.
11. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 257-263, Madison, 2003.
12. A. Moore and C. Atkeson. The parti-game algorithm for variable resolution reinforcement learning in multidimensional state-spaces. Machine Learning, 21, 1995.
13. S.A. Nene, S.K. Nayar, and H. Murase. Columbia object image library (COIL-100). Technical Report CUCS-006-96, Columbia University, New York, 1996.
14. J.R. Quinlan. The effect of noise on concept learning. In Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach: Volume II, pages 149-166. Kaufmann, Los Altos, 1986.
15. C. Schmid and R. Mohr. Local greyvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(5):530-535, 1997.
16. C. Schmid, R. Mohr, and C. Bauckhage. Evaluation of interest point detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision, 37(2):151-172, 2000.
17. P.G. Schyns and L. Rodet. Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(3):681-696, 1997.
18. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning, an Introduction. MIT Press, 1998.
19. M.J. Tarr and Y.D. Cheng. Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1):23-30, 2003.
20. C.J.C.H. Watkins. Learning From Delayed Rewards. PhD thesis, King's College, Cambridge, 1989.
21. S.D. Whitehead and D.H. Ballard. Learning to perceive and act by trial and error. Machine Learning, 7:45-83, 1991.