Conducting ethical evaluations with disadvantaged and minority target groups

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 49-54

  English, Brian ^a  

^a NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957977071     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409701800105     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Gillroy, J.M. (1992). The ethical poverty of cost-benefit methods: Autonomy, efficiency and public policy choice. Policy Sciences, 25, 83-102.
2. Glasson, B.C. (1985). Guidelines for user participation in the system development process. In B. Shackel (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. North Holland: Elsevier Science.
3. House, E.R. (1993). Professional evaluation: social impact and political consequences. London: Sage.
4. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, (1994). Standards for evaluation of education programs, projects and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Lee, R.L. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London:Sage.
6. Straton, R.G. (1990). Research of the evaluation process in Australia. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 2, 2-12.