Sensory integration across modalities: How kinaesthesia integrates with vision in visual orientation discrimination

Seeing and Perceiving

Volumn 23, Issue 5-6, 2010, Pages 435-462

  Treisman, Michel ^a   Lages, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context; Criterion setting theory; Decision criterion; Oblique effect; Orientation anisotropy; Sensory integration

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT; CRITERION SETTING THEORY; DECISION CRITERIONS; OBLIQUE EFFECT; SENSORY INTEGRATION;

ANISOTROPY; DECISION MAKING; FORECASTING; INTEGRATION; SIGNAL DETECTION;

DECISION THEORY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957973435     PISSN: 18784755     EISSN: 18784763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/187847510X541126     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alais, D. and Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration, Current Biology 14, 257-262. (Pubitemid 38215356)
2. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals, Psycholog. Bull. 78, 266-278.
3. Beierholm, U. R., Körding, K. P., Shams, L. and Ma, W. J. (2008). Comparing Bayesian models for multisensory cue combination without mandatory integration, Adv. Neural Info. Proc. Systems 20, 1-8.
4. Boltz, R. L., Harwerth, R. S. and Smith III, E. L. (1979). Orientation anisotropy of visual stimuli in rhesus monkey: a behavioral study, Science 205, 511-513. (Pubitemid 9232779)
5. Braida, L. D., Lim, J. S., Berliner, J. E., Durlach, N. I., Rabinowitz, W. N. and Purks, S. R. (1984).Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 76, 722-731.
6. Buchanan-Smith, H. M. and Heeley, D. W. (1993). Anisotropic axes in orientation perception are not retinotopically mapped, Perception 22, 1389-1402.
7. Burr, D. C. and Wijesundra, S.-A. (1991). Orientation discrimination depends on spatial frequency, Vision Research 31, 1449-1452.
8. Clifford, C. W. G., Wyatt, A. M., Arnold, D. H., Smith, S. T. and Wenderoth, P. (2001). Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination, Vision Research 41, 151-159. (Pubitemid 32332840)
9. Durlach, N. I. and Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 46, 372-383.
10. Dyde, R. T., Jenkin, M. R. and Harris, L. R. (2006). The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright, Exper. Brain Res. 173, 612-622. (Pubitemid 44289483)
11. Ernst, M. O. and Banks,M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion, Nature 415, 429-433. (Pubitemid 34100953)
12. Essock, E. A. (1980). The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects, Perception 9, 37-46. (Pubitemid 10095488)
13. Essock, E. A., DeFord, J. K., Hansen, B. C. and Sinai, M. J. (2003). Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect, Vision Research 43, 1329-1335. (Pubitemid 36555755)
14. Fahle, M. and Harris, J. (1998). The use of different orientation cues in vernier acuity, Percept. Psychophys. 60, 405-426. (Pubitemid 128457631)
15. Fechner, G. (1860/1966). Elements of Psychophysics, Vol. 1 (transl. H. E. Adler). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, USA.
16. Fregly, A. R., Graybiel, A., Miller, E. F. and Van den Brink, G. (1965). Visual localization of horizontal as function of body tilt utilizing several positions with respect to gravity, Technical Report NASACR-69427, Document ID 19660006291.
17. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York, USA.
18. Green, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: implications for theories of speech perception, in:Hearing by Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory-visual Speech , R. Campbell and B. Dodds (Eds). Erlbaum, London, UK.
19. Howard, I. P. and Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
20. Howard, I. P. and Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human Spatial Orientation. Wiley, London, UK.
21. Jacobs, R. A. (1999). Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth, Vision Research 39, 3621-3629. (Pubitemid 29347156)
22. Jazayeri, M. and Movshon, J. A. (2006). Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations, Nature Neurosci. 9, 690-696. (Pubitemid 44012268)
23. Keppel, G. (1973). Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
24. Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, CA, USA.
25. Lages, M. and Paul, A. (2006). Visual long-term memory for spatial frequency? Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 13, 486-492. (Pubitemid 44825073)
26. Lages, M. and Treisman, M. (1998). Spatial frequency discrimination: visual long-term memory or criterion setting? Vision Research 38, 557-572. (Pubitemid 27519141)
27. Lages, M. and Treisman, M. (2010). A criterion setting theory of discrimination learning that accounts for anisotropies and context effects, Seeing and Perceiving 23, 401-434.
28. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. and Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion, Vision Research 35, 389-412.
29. Li, W. and Westheimer, G. (1997). Human discrimination of the implicit orientation of simple symmetrical patterns, Vision Research 37, 565-572. (Pubitemid 27095459)
30. Lipshits, M., Bengoetxea A., Cheron G. and McIntyre, J. (2005). Two reference frames for visual perception in two gravity conditions, Perception 34, 545-555. (Pubitemid 40882412)
31. Lipshits, M. and McIntyre, J. (1999). Gravity affects the preferred vertical and horizontal in visual perception of orientation, Neuroreport 10, 1085-1089. (Pubitemid 29317993)
32. Luyat, M. and Gentaz, E. (2002). Body tilt effect on the reproduction of orientations: studies on the visual oblique effect and subjective orientations, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 28, 1002-1011.
33. Ma, W. J., Beck, J. M., Latham, P. E. and Pouget, A. (2006). Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes, Nature Neurosci. 9, 1432-1438. (Pubitemid 44646216)
34. Ma,W. J. and Pouget, A. (2008). Linking neurons to behavior in multisensory perception: a computational review, Brain Research 1242, 4-12.
35. Macmillan, N. A. and Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M.W., Asplund, R. and Dyrnes, S. (1990). Perfect visual short-term memory for periodic patterns, Eur. J. Cognit. Psychol. 2, 345-362.
37. McIntyre, J., Lipshits, M., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A. and Gurfinkel, V. (2001). Internal reference frames for representation and storage of visual information: the role of gravity, Acta Astronautica 49, 111-121. (Pubitemid 33074334)
38. Mendenhall, W. and Sincich, T. (1988). Statistics for the Engineering and Computer Sciences, 2nd edn. Collier Macmillan, London, UK.
39. Mittelstaedt, H. (1983). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical, Naturwissenschaften 70, 272-281. (Pubitemid 13038608)
40. Muller, C. M. P., Brenner, E. and Smeets, J. B. J. (2009). Testing a counter-intuitive prediction of optimal cue combination, Vision Research 49, 134-139.
41. Pelli, D. G. and Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays, Vision Research 31, 1337-1350.
42. Soechting, J. F. and Flanders, M. (1992). Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 167-191.
43. Solomon, J. A. and Morgan, M. J. (2006). Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt, Proc. Royal Soc. B 273, 2681-2686. (Pubitemid 44570371)
44. Tanner, W. P. and Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection, Psycholog. Rev. 61, 401-409.
45. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). Psychophysical analysis, Amer. J. Psychol. 38, 369-389.
46. Treisman, M. (1984a). Contingent aftereffects and situationally coded criteria, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 423, Timing and Time Perception, 131-141. (Pubitemid 14122534)
47. Treisman, M. (1984b). A theory of criterion setting: an alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching, J. Exper. Psychol.: General 113, 443-463.
48. Treisman, M. (1985). The magical number seven and some other features of category scaling: properties of a model for absolute judgment, J. Mathemat. Psychol. 29, 175-230.
49. Treisman, M. (1987). Effects of the setting and adjustment of decision criteria on psychophysical performance, in:Progress in Mathematical Psychology - I , E. E. Roskam and R. Suck (Eds), pp. 253-297. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
50. Treisman, M. (1998). Combining information: probability summation and probability averaging in detection and discrimination, Psychological Methods 3, 252-265.
51. Treisman, M. and Faulkner, A. (1984a). The setting and maintenance of criteria representing levels of confidence, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 10, 119-139.
52. Treisman, M. and Faulkner, A. (1984b). The effect of signal probability on the slope of the receiver operating characteristic given by the rating procedure, Brit. J. Math. Statistical Psychol. 37, 199-215.
53. Treisman, M. and Faulkner, A. (1985). Can decision criteria interchange locations? Some positive evidence, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 11, 187-208.
54. Treisman, M. and Faulkner, A. (1987). Generation of random sequences by human subjects: cognitive operations or psychophysical process? J. Exper. Psychol.: General 116, 337-355.
55. Treisman, M. and Leshowitz, B. (1969). The effects of duration, area, and background intensity on the visual intensity difference threshold given by the forced-choice procedure: derivations from a statistical decision model for sensory discrimination, Percept. Psychophys. 6, 281-296.
56. Treisman,M. andWilliams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies, Psycholog. Rev. 91, 68-111.
57. Walpole, R. E. (1982). Introduction to Statistics, 3rd edn. Collier Macmillan, New York, USA.
58. Westheimer, G. and Beard, B. L. (1998). Orientation dependency for foveal line stimuli: detection and intensity discrimination, resolution, orientation discrimination and vernier acuity, Vision Research 38, 1097-1103. (Pubitemid 28182086)
59. Westheimer, G. and Li, W. (1996). Classifying illusory contours by means of orientation discrimination, J. Neurophysiol. 75, 523-528. (Pubitemid 26073452)
60. Wickelgren, W. A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments, J. Mathematical Psychol. 5, 102-122.
61. Yuille, A. L. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics, in:Perception as Bayesian Inference , D. C. Knill and W. Richards (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.