Investigation of automation deployment in the main control room of nuclear power plants by using adaptive automation

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 350-360

  Jou, Yung Tsan ^a,c   Yenn, Tzu Chung ^b   Yang, Li Chen ^b  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^c NONE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adaptive automation; Advanced MCR; Human performance; Human system interface; Level of automation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE AUTOMATION; ADVANCED MCR; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN SYSTEM INTERFACE; LEVEL OF AUTOMATION;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL ROOMS (POWER PLANTS); DESIGN; ERRORS; EXPERIMENTS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); NASA; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; PLANT SHUTDOWNS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 79957969652     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20271     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Billings, C. E., (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
2. Byrne, E., &, Parasuraman, R., (1996). Psychophysiology and adaptive automation. Biological Psychology, 42 (3), 249-268. (Pubitemid 26068931)
3. Carmody, M. A., &, Gluckman, J. P., (1993). Task specific effects of automation and automation failure on performance, workload and situation awareness. In, R. S. Jensen, &, D. Neumeister, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 167-171). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, Ohio State University.
4. Endsley, M. R., (1987), "The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits," in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1388-1392.
5. Endsley, M. R., (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annul Meeting, Santa Monica, CA. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 97-101.
6. Endsley, M. R., (2000). Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
7. Endsley, M. R., &, Kaber, D. B., (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42 (3), 462-492. (Pubitemid 29074295)
8. Hart, S. G., &, Staveland, L. E., (1988). Human mental workload, chapter development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier Science.
9. Huang, F. H., Hwang, S. L., Yenn, T. C., Yu, Y. C., Hsu, C. C., &, Hwang, H. W., (2006). Evaluation and comparison of alarm reset modes in advanced control room of nuclear power plants. Safety Science, 44, 935-946.
10. Huang, F. H., Lee, Y. L., Hwang, S. L., Yenn, T. C., Yu, Y. C., Hsu, C. C., et al., (2007). Experimental evaluation of human-system interaction on alarm design. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237 (3), 308-315.
11. Jou, Y. T., Yenn, T. C., Lin, C. J., Yang, C. W., &, Chiang, C., (2009). Evaluation of operators' mental workload of human-system interface automation in the advanced nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 239, 2537-2542.
12. Kaber, D. B., &, Endsley, M. R., (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5 (2), 113-153.
13. Kaber, D. B., Perry, C. M., Segall, N., McClernon, C. K., &, Prinzel, L. J., (2006). Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 447-462.
14. Kaber, D. B., &, Riley, M. J., (1999). Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3 (3), 169-187.
15. Kessel, C. J., &, Wickens, C. D., (1982). The transfer of failure-detection skills between monitoring and controlling dynamic systems. Human Factors, 24 (1), 49-60.
16. Ma, R., &, Kaber, D. B., (2007). Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task. Ergonomics, 50 (8), 1351-1364. (Pubitemid 46930116)
17. O'Hara, J., Persensky, J. J., &, Szabo, A., (2006). Development of human factors engineering guidance for safety evaluation of advanced reactors. Paper presented at the 5th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Controls, and Human Machine Interface Technology, Albuquerque, NM.
18. Parasuraman, R., Bahri, T., Deaton, J., Morrison, J., &, Barnes, M., (1992). Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems. Progress Rep. No. NAWCADWAR-92033-60. Warmister, PA: Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division.
19. Parasuraman, R., &, Riley, V., (1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39 (2), 230-253.
20. Perrow, C. P., (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books.
21. Sheridan, T. B., (1997). Supervisory control. In:, G. Salvendy, Editor, Handbook of Human Factors (pp. 1295-1327). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
22. Sheridan, T. B., (2006). Supervisory control. In:, G. Salvendy, Editor, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 1025-1052). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
23. Singh, I. I., Molloy, R., &, Parasuraman, R., (1997). Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: Role of display location. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 46 (1), 17-30. (Pubitemid 127375864)
24. Wiener, E. L., (1988). Cockpit automation. In, E. L. Wiener, &, D. C. Nagel, (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 433-461). San Diego: Academic.