New insight into the genetic structure of the Allolobophora chlorotica aggregate in Europe using microsatellite and mitochondrial data

Pedobiologia

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 217-224

  Dupont, L ^a   Lazrek, F ^a   Porco, D ^b,d   King, R A ^c,g   Rougerie, R ^b,d   Symondson, W O C ^c   Livet, A ^a   Richard, B ^d,h   Decaens T ^d   Butt, K R ^e   Mathieu, J ^f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^f SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^g College of Life and Environmental Sciences   (United Kingdom)

^h Laboratoire Biosol   (France)

Author keywords

Cryptic diversity; DNA barcoding; Earthworms; Enriched genomic library; Microsatellites; Population sub structure

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DATA SET; EARTHWORM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOMICS; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; TAXONOMY;

EUROPE;

ALLOLOBOPHORA CHLOROTICA;

EID: 79957953217     PISSN: 00314056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bandelt H.J., Forster P., Sykes B.C., Richards M.B. Mitochondrial portraits of human-populations using Median Networks. Genetics 1995, 141:743-753.
2. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Goudet, J., Chikhi, L., Bonhomme, F., 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Population, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
3. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Billote N., Lagoda P., Risterucci A., Baurens F. Microsatellite enriched libraries: applied methodology for the development of ISSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits 1999, 54:277-288.
5. Bouché M.B. Lombriciens de France 1972, Ecologie et systématique INRA, Paris.
6. Cannavacciuolo M., Bellido A., Cluzeau D., Gascuel C., Trehen P. A geostatistical approach to the study of earthworm distribution in grassland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1998, 9:345-349.
7. Cavalli-Sforza L.L., Edwards A.W.F. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1967, 19:233-257.
8. Chapuis M.P., Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:621-631.
9. Dakin E.E., Avise J.C. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 2004, 93:504-509.
10. David P., Pujol B., Viard F., Castella V., Goudet J. Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:2474-2487.
11. DeWoody J.A., Nason J.D., Hipkins V.D. Mitigating scoring errors in microsatellite data from wild populations. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:951-957.
12. Dupont L. Perspectives on the application of molecular genetics to earthworm ecology. Pedobiologia 2009, 52:191-205.
13. Hajibabaei M., DeWaard J.R., Ivanova N.V., Ratnasingham S., Dooh R.T., Kirk S.L., Mackie P.M., Hebert P.D.N. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360:1959-1967.
14. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
15. Harper G.L., Cesarini S., Casey S.P., Morgan A.J., Kille P., Bruford M.W. Microsatellite markers for the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:325-327.
16. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., Dewaard J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Philos. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:313-321.
17. Ivanova N.V., Dewaard J.R., Hebert P.D.N. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:998-1002.
18. King R.A., Tibble A.L., Symondson O.C. Opening a can of worms: unprecedented sympatric cryptic diversity within British lumbricid earthworms. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:4694-4698.
19. Lazrek F., Velavan T.P., Mathieu J., Dupont L. Application of molecular genetics to earthworm ecology: current research and promising future directions. Biology of Earthworms 2011, 279-298. Elsevier, Berlin. A. Karaca (Ed.).
20. Lowe C.N., Butt K.R. Life-cycle traits of the dimorphic earthworm species Allolobophora chlorotica (Savigny, 1826) under controlled laboratory conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2007, 43:495-499.
21. Lowe C.N., Butt K.R. Allolobophora chlorotica (Savigny, 1826): evidence for classification as two separate species. Pedobiologia 2008, 52:81-84.
22. Margerie P., Decaens T., Bureau F., Alard D. Spatial distribution of earthworm species assemblages in a chalky slope of the Seine Valley (Normandy, France). Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2001, 37:291-296.
23. Novo M., Velavan T.P., Almodóvar A., Schulenburg H., Díaz-Cosín D.J., Michiels N.K. Microsatellite markers for the drought-resistant earthworm Hormogaster elisae. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2008, 8:901-903.
24. Raymond M., Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86:248-249.
25. Rossi J.-P., Lavelle P., Albrecht A. Relationships between spatial pattern of the endogeic earthworm Polypheretima elongata and soil heterogeneity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1997, 29:485-488.
26. Rouabah L., Descamps M. Biology of Lumbricus terrestris, Allolobophora chlorotica and Dendrobaena pygmea (Annelida, Oligochaeta) in eastern Algeria. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 2001, 126:49-58.
27. Rougerie R., Decaëns T., Deharveng L., Porco D., James S., Chang C., Richard B., Potapov M., Suhardjono Y., Hebert P.D.N. DNA barcodes for soil animal taxonomy. Pesqui. Agropec. Bras. 2009, 44:789-802.
28. Satchell J.E. Colour dimorphism in Allolobophora chlorotica Sav. (Lumbricidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 1967, 36:623-630.
29. Sims R.W., Gerard B.M. Synopsis of the British Fauna (31)-Earthworms 1999, The Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Brackish-Water Sciences Association, London, pp. 1-169.
30. van der Wurff A.W.G., Isaaks J.A., Ernsting G., Van Straalen N.M. Population substructures in the soil invertebrate Orchesella cincta, as revealed by microsatellite and TE-AFLP markers. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:1349-1359.
31. van Oosterhout C., Weetman D., Hutchinson W.F. Estimation and adjustment of microsatellite null alleles in nonequilibrium populations. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6:255-256.
32. Velavan T.P., Schulenburg H., Michiels N. Development and characterization of novel microsatellite markers for the common earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris L.). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7:1060-1062.
33. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evaluation 1984, 38:1358-1370.