Axel Heidenreich. Consensus criteria for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer: Not ready for routine use. Eur Urol 2011;59:495-7

European Urology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2011, Pages e5-

  Barentsz, Jelle ^a   Dickinson, Louise ^b,c,d   Sciarra, Alessandro ^e  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CONSENSUS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; LETTER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; MALE; NOTE; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; STANDARD; UROLOGY;

CONSENSUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; UROLOGY;

EID: 79957950089     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.013     Document Type: Letter

References (18)

1. A. Heidenreich Consensus criteria for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer: not ready for routine use Eur Urol 59 2011 495 497
2. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, and C. Allen Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
3. H. Augustin, G.A. Fritz, T. Ehammer, M. Auprich, and K. Pummer Accuracy of 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables Acta Radiol 50 2009 562 569
4. R.V. Chandra, S. Heinze, R. Dowling, C. Shadbolt, A. Costello, and J. Pedersen Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer ANZ J Surg 77 2007 860 865 (Pubitemid 47353065)
5. S.W. Heijmink, J.J. Futterer, and T. Hambrock Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T - comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance Radiology 244 2007 184 195 (Pubitemid 46981973)
6. A.B. Porcaro, F. Migliorini, and C. Monaco Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil (ER-MRI) in staging early prostate cancer (EPC) before radical prostatectomy (RP) Eur Urol Suppl 8 2009 355
7. P. Torricelli, A. Barberini, F. Cinquantini, M. Sighinolfi, and A.M. Cesinaro 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer Acad Radiol 15 2008 1118 1125
8. K.C. Latchamsetty, L.S. Borden Jr., and C.R. Porter Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve? Can J Urol 14 2007 3429 3434
9. B.N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, and T.H. Helbich Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging - initial results Radiology 245 2007 176 185 (Pubitemid 47417801)
10. H. Augustin, G.A. Fritz, T. Ehammer, M. Auprich, and K. Pummer Accuracy of 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables Acta Radiol 50 2009 562 569
11. S. Cirillo, M. Petracchini, and P. Della Monica Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsie sto localize peripheral zone tumors Clin Radiol 63 2008 871 879
12. N. Lawrentschuk, and N. Fleshner The role of magnetic resonance imaging in targeting prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsies and elevated prostate specific antigen levels BJU Int 103 2008 730 733
13. A. Sciarra, M. Panebianco, and M. Ciccariello Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy Clin Cancer Res 16 2010 1875 1878
14. T. Hambrock, J.J. Futterer, and H.J. Huisman Thirty-two channel coil 3T magnetic resonance-guided biopsies of prostate tumor suspicious regions identified on multimodality 3T magnetic resonance imaging: technique and feasibility Invest Radiol 43 2008 686 694
15. T. Hambrock, D.M. Somford, and C. Hoeks Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen J Urol 183 2010 520 527
16. D. Yakar, T. Hambrock, C. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, and J.J. Futterer Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate: feasibility, technique and clinical applications Top Magn Reson Imaging 19 2008 291 295
17. K.M. Pondman, J.J. Fütterer, and B. ten Haken MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review Eur Urol 54 2008 517 527
18. A. Sciarra, J. Barentsz, and A. Bjartell Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer Eur Urol 59 2011 962 977