Perceiving personality in simple motion cues

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 358-363

  Koppensteiner, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Big Five; Motion kinematics; Nonverbal communication; Personality; Social perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957949840     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bechinie M., Grammer K. Charisma cam: A prototype of an intelligent digital sensory organ for virtual humans. Intelligent virtual agents 2003, 212-216. Springer, Berlin. T. Rist (Ed.).
2. Blake R., Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:47-73.
3. Bloom P., Veres C. The perceived intentionality of groups. Cognition 1999, 71(1):B1-B9.
4. Borkenau P., Liebler A. Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero-acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:645-657.
5. Borkenau P., Ostendorf F. Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung fünf robuster Persönlichkeitsfaktoren. Diagnostica 1991, 37:29-41.
6. Brunswik E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments 1956, University of California Press, Berkeley.
7. Chang D.H.F., Troje N.F. Perceptions of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(5):1-10.
8. Csibra G., Gergley G., Bíró S., Koós O., Brockbank M. Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of 'pure resaon' in infancy. Cognition 1999, 72(3):237-267.
9. DeYoung C.G. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:1138-1151.
10. DeYoung C.G., Peterson J.B., Higgins D.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health?. Personality and Individual Differences 2002, 33:533-552.
11. Digman J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:1246-1256.
12. Dittrich W.H., Troscianko T., Lea S.E., Morgan D. Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 1996, 25(6):727-738.
13. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Bíró S. Taking the intentional stance at 12months of age. Cognition 1995, 56(2):165-193.
14. Gifford R. A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:398-412.
15. Gosling S.D., Ko S.J., Mannarelli T., Morris M.E. A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:379-398.
16. Grammer K., Honda M., Juette A., Schmitt A. Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication: Unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77(3):487-508.
17. Hall J.A., Andrzejewski S.A., Murphy N.A., Mast M.S., Feinstein B.A. Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality 2008, 42:1476-1489.
18. Heider F., Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behaviour. American Journal of Psychology 1944, 57:243-249.
19. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model of its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
20. Kenny D.A., Horner C., Kashy D.A., Chu L. Consensus at zero-acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:88-97.
21. Koppensteiner M., Grammer K. Motion patterns in political speech and their influence on personality ratings. Journal of Research in Personality 2010, 44:374-379.
22. Kozlowski L.T., Cutting J.E. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics 1977, 21(6):575-580.
23. Luck G., Saarikallio S., Burger B., Thompson M.R., Toiviainen P. Effects of the Big Five and musical genre on music-induced movement. Journal of Research in Personality 2010, 44:714-720.
24. McCrae R.R., Costa T.C. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 1997, 52(5):509-516.
25. Michotte A. The perception of causality 1963, Basic Books (Originally Published 1946), New York.
26. Morris M.W., Peng K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67(6):949-971.
27. Naumann L.P., Vazire S., Rentfrow P.J., Gosling S.D. Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35:1661-1671.
28. Oberzaucher E., Grammer K. Everything is movement: On the nature of embodied communication. Embodied communication 2008, 157-177. Oxford University Press. I. Wachsmuth, G. Knoblich (Eds.).
29. Pollick F.E., Patterson H.M., Bruderlin A., Sanford A.J. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 2001, 82(2):B51-B61.
30. Scholl B.J., Nakayama K. Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science 2002, 13:493-498.
31. Scholl B.J., Tremoulet P.D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4(8):299-309.
32. Troje N. Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2002, 2:371-387.
33. White P.A. The role of activity in visual impressions of causality. Acta Psychologica 2006, 123:166-185.