Behavioral science-informed technology interventions for change in residential energy consumption

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2209-2214

  Crowley, Matthew ^a   Mori, Kevin ^a   Heitz, Aurélia ^a   Banerjee, Banny ^a   Matta, Annika ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Home; Sustainability; Usability testing and evaluation; User interface design

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ECONOMICS; ENERGY POLICY; HOUSING; USER INTERFACES;

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BEHAVIOUR CHANGES; ENERGY CRISIS; HOME; INTERACTIVE INTERFACES; NEW APPROACHES; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION; USABILITY TESTING AND EVALUATION; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS; UTILITIES COMPANIES;

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

EID: 79957934117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1979742.1979926     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. American Physical Society. Energy Future: Think Efficiency. Energy Future Report (2008), 1-109. http://www.aps.org/energyefficiencyreport/.
2. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, (2007), 851.
3. Darby, S. Making it Obvious: Designing Feedback into Energy Consumption. Proc. Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, 2000.
4. Department of Energy. http://www.energy.gov/.
5. Frith, C.D., Friston, K., Liddle, P.F., Frackowiak, R. S. J. Action and the Prefrontal Cortex in Man: A Study with PET. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, The Royal Society (1991), 241-246.
6. Froehlich, J. The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1-9.
7. Google PowerMeter. http://www.google.com/powermeter/.
8. Hemminger, John. New Science for a Secure and Sustainable Energy Future: A Report of a Subcommittee to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee. US Department of Energy (2008), 1-2.
9. Parker, D., Hoak, D., Meier, A., Brown, R. How Much Energy Are We Using? Potential of Residential Energy Demand Feedback Devices. Proc. ACEEE. Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, (2006), 2-11.
10. PG&E SmartMeter. http://www.pge.com/smartmeter/.
11. Pierce, J., Odom, W., Blevis, E. Energy Aware Dwelling: A Critical Survey of Interaction Design for Eco-Visualizations. Proc. OZCHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1-7.
12. Schultz, P., Khazian W., and Zaleski, A. Using Normative Social Influence to Promote Conservation Among Hotel Guests. Social Influence, 3, (2008), 4-23.
13. Socolow, R. H. The Twin Rivers Program on Energy Conservation in Housing: Highlights and Conclusions. Saving Energy in the Home: Princeton's Experiments at Twin Rivers. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, (1978), 2-62.
14. Stanford Institute of Design. http://www.design.stanford.edu/PD/.
15. Wilson, A. & Yost, P. Buildings and the environment: The Numbers. Environmental Building News, (2001), 10.
16. Winett, R.A., Kagel, J. H., Battalio, R. C., Winkler, R.C. Effects of Monetary Rebates, Feedback, and Information on Residential Electricity Conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (1), (1978), 73-80. (Pubitemid 8275380)