Addressing water contamination from concentrated animal feeding operations

Land Use Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 706-711

  Centner, Terence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Concentrated animal feeding operation; Discharge; Land application; Manure; Permit; Water pollution

Indexed keywords

DISCHARGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MANURE; POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79957922818     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alsharif K. Construction and stormwater pollution: policy, violations, and penalties. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:612-616.
2. Bartfeld E. Point-nonpoint source trading: looking beyond potential cost savings. Environ. Law 1993, 23:43-106.
3. Becker J.C. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. EPA: why it is important. Environ. Law Rep. 2006, 36:10566-10575.
4. Centner T.J. Clarifying NPDES requirements for concentrated animal feeding operations. Penn. State Environ. Law Rev. 2006, 14:361-395.
5. Centner T.J. Courts and the EPA interpret NPDES general permit requirements for CAFOs. Environ. Law 2008, 38:1215-1238.
6. Centner T.J. Discerning liability for contamination by poultry integrators and producers under US federal law. World's Poultry Sci. J. 2010, 66:5-16.
7. Czymmek K. The New York CAFO program: Successfully connecting science, policy, regulation, and implementation. Clearwaters, Spring 2005, New York Water Environment Association, Inc., Syracuse, NY, p. 27.
8. de Muizon P. " Meaningfully distinct" waters, the unitary waters theory, and the clean water Act. Ecol. Law Quar. 2007, 32:417-451.
9. Duke L.D., Chung Y.J. Industrial storm water pollution prevention: effectiveness and limitations of source controls in the transportation industry. Waste Manage. 1995, 15:543-558.
10. Jaffe J. Letter to the Sierra Club Environmental Law Program, Comments on EPA's Implementation of the BCT Cost Test for Fecal Coliform in its June 30, 2006 proposed rulemaking 2006, August 26.
11. Maddock T.A. Fragmenting regimes: how water quality regulation is changing political-economic landscapes. Geoforum 2004, 35:217-230.
12. Maryland Agriculture Code Annotated, 2009. Section 8-803.1(e).
13. National Pork Producers Council vs. EPA, 2008. Case no. 08-61093.
14. National Pork Producers Council Petitioners' (NPPC) Brief, 2009. National Pork Producers Council vs. EPA, Case no. 08-61093.
15. Natural Resources Defense Council Petitioners' (NRDC) Brief, 2009. National Pork Producers Council vs. EPA, Case no. 08-61093.
16. Oklahoma Attorney General's Complaint, 2005. State of Oklahoma vs. Tyson Foods, Inc., Case no. 4:05-cv-00329.
17. Paudel K.P., Bhattarai K., Gauthier W.M., Hall L.M. Geographic information systems (GIS) based model of dairy manure transportation and application with environmental quality consideration. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:1634-1643.
18. Paudel K.P., McIntosh C.S. Country report: broiler industry and broiler litter-related problems in the southeastern United States. Waste Manage. 2005, 25:1083-1088.
19. Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, 2009. Section 506.
20. Rosenberg R.H. Doing more or doing less for the environment: Shedding light on EPA's stealth method of environmental enforcement. Boston Coll. Environ. Affairs Law Rev. 2008, 35:175-216.
21. Science Applications International Corporation, 2002. Supporting Statement for the Information Collection Request for the Final NPDES and ELG Regulatory Revisions for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, Reston, VA, pp. 1-95.
22. Shimshack J.P., Ward M.B. Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2005, 50:519-540.
23. US Code, 2006. Title 33, sections 1251-1387.
24. US CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), 2004. Title 40, section 122.21(a)(1).
25. US CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), 2009. Title 40, parts 122 & 412.
26. US EPA National water quality inventory: 1998 report to Congress 2000, EPA Office of Water, Washington, DC.
27. US EPA National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations; proposed rule. Fed. Regist. 2001, 66:2960-3145.
28. US EPA National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs); final rule. Fed. Regist. 2003, 68:7176-7227.
29. US EPA EPA updates position statement on EMS. Professional Safety 2006, 51:44-45.
30. US EPA Revised national pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations in response to the Waterkeeper decision; proposed rule. Fed. Regist. 2006, 71:37744-37787.
31. US EPA Development document for the Final Revisions to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Regulation and the Effluent Guidelines for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Addendum 2008, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC.
32. US EPA Revised national pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations in response to the Waterkeeper decision; final rule. Fed. Regist. 2008, 73:70418-70486.
33. US EPA EPA targets clean water act violations at livestock feeding operations. Enforcement Alert 2009, 10:1-4.
34. US EPA National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress-2004 Reporting Cycle, EPA 841-R-08-001 2009.
35. US EPA Implementation guidance on CAFO regulations-CAFOs that discharge or are proposing to discharge, EPA 833-R-10-006 2010.
36. Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. vs. EPA, 2005. Fed. Reporter 3d 399, 486-524.
37. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2007. Use of Whole Farm EMS as a Supplement to CAFO Permits for the Dairy Sector. Madison, WI.