Secondary endoscopic pyelotomy in children with failed pyeloplasty

Urology

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1450-1454

  Veenboer, Paul W ^a   Chrzan, Rafal ^a   Dik, Pieter ^a   Klijn, Aart J ^a   De Jong, Tom P V M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CAUTERIZATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INFANT; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; PYELOTOMY; SCHOOL CHILD; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79957885428     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Tan BJ, Smith AD. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):55-59. (Pubitemid 38315396)
2. Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, et al. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology. 2003;61:1107-1112.
3. Knudsen BE, Cook AJ, Watterson JD, et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology. 2004, Feb.;63(2):230-234. (Pubitemid 38234407)
4. Whitfleld HN, Mills V, Miller RA, et al. Percutaneous pyelolysis: an alternative to pyeloplasty. Br J Urol. 1983;55 (Suppl):93-96.
5. King LR, Coughlin PW, Ford KK, et al. Initial experiences with percutaneous and transurethral ablation of postoperative ureteral strictures in children. J Urol. 1984;131:1167-1170. (Pubitemid 14082439)
6. Douenias R, Smith AD, Brock WA. Advances in the percutaneous management of the ureteropelvic junction and other obstructions of the urinary tract in children. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17:419-428. (Pubitemid 20160635)
7. Faerber GJ, Ritchey ML, Bloom DA. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;154:1495-1497.
8. Gerber GS, Kim J, Nold S, et al. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy for the treatment of primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Tech Urol. 2000;6:46-49. (Pubitemid 30104589)
9. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, et al. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J Urol. 2005;174:2363-2366. (Pubitemid 41611826)
10. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, et al. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007;178:2571-2575. (Pubitemid 350052194)
11. Knudsen BE, Cook AJ, Watterson JD, et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology. 2004;63(2):230-234. (Pubitemid 38234407)
12. Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, et al. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol. 2008;180:1397-1402.
13. Bagley DH, Liu JB, Goldberg BB, Grasso M. Endopyelotomy: importance of Crossing vessels demonstrated by endoluminal ultrasonography. J Endourol. 1995;9:465-469.