Landscape architecture's commitment to landscape concept: A missing link?

Journal of Landscape Architecture

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 56-65

  Kaplan, Adnan ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Landscape; Landscape architecture; Landscape architecture concept; Landscape concept; Self criticism in the discipline

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957871816     PISSN: 18626033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2009.9723413     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aasbø, S., 1999. History and Ecology in Everyday Landscape. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 53:145–152.
2. Appleton, J., 1996. The Experience of Landscape, Chichester:John Wiley & Sons.
3. Bell, S., 1999. Landscape:Pattern, Perception and Process, London:Spon Press.
4. Benson, J.F., and Roe, M.H., 2000. “ The scale and scope of landscape and sustainability ”. In Landscape and Sustainability, Edited by:Benson, J.F., and Roe, M.H., 1–11. London:Spon Press.
5. Booth, P., 1994. Landscape Policies and Development Plans. Planning Practice & Research, 9 (3):239–257.
6. Brown, K.D., and Jennings, T., 2003. Social Consciousness in Landscape Architecture Education:Toward a Conceptual Framework. Landscape Journal, 22 (2):99–112.
7. Brunetta, G., and Voghera, A., 2008. Evaluating Landscape for Shared Values:Tools, Principles, and Methods. Landscape Research, 33 (1):71–87.
8. Bull, C., Valuing the contribution of landscape architectural works to Australian culture:a preliminary assessment. 20th Century Heritage. Our Recent Legacy:2001 Australia ICOMOS National Conference. pp. 1–12. Adelaide:ICOMOS, c/o Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria.
9. Bullivant, L., 2007. ‘Activating nature’:The Magic Realism of Contemporary Landscape Architecture in Europe. Architectural Design, 2:76–87.
10. Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Weathers, K.C., and Jones, C.G., 2003. A Framework for a Theory of Ecological Boundaries. Bioscience, 53 (8):750–758.
11. Corner, J., 2002. “ Origins of theory ”. In Theory in Landscape Architecture, Edited by:Swaffield, S., 19–20. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
12. Green, B., 2001. Threatened Landscapes:Conserving Cultural Environments, London:Spon Press.
13. Hunt, J.D., 2000. Greater Perfection:The Practice of Garden Theory, Philadelphia:The University of Pennsylvania Press.
14. Hunt, J.D., 2004. On the Perception of the Term Landscape. Topos, 47:38–43.
15. Jacobs, P., and Mann, R., 2000. Landscape Prospects of the Next Millennium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47:129–133.
16. Kaplan, A., Peyzaj mimarlıg˘ ı meslek disiplinine eles¸ tirel bir bakıs¸. 1st Peyzaj Mimarlıg˘ ı Kongresi (First National Landscape Architecture Congress). October19–212000. pp. 191–214. Ankara:UCTEA Chamber of Landscape Architects. A critical inquiry into the professional discipline of landscape architecture
17. Levine, M.P., Miller, K., and Taylor, W., 2004. Introduction:Ethics and Architecture. The Philosophical Forum, XXXV (2):103–115.
18. Linehan, J.R., and Gross, M., 1998. Back to the Future, Back to Basics:The Social Ecology of Landscapes and the Future of Landscape Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42:207–223.
19. Lyle, J.T., 1985. Design for Human Ecosystems, New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
20. Makhzoumi, J., and Pungetti, G., 2005. Ecological Landscape Design and Planning:The Mediterranean Context, London:Spon Press.
21. McAvin, M., Meyer, E.K., Corner, J., Shirvani, H., Helphand, K., Riley, R.B., and Scarfo, R., 1991. Landscape Architecture and Critical Inquiry. Landscape Journal, 10 (2):155–172.
22. Meinig, D.W., 1979. “ The beholding eye:ten versions of the same scene ”. In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes, Edited by:Meinig, D.W., 33–48. New York:Oxford University Press.
23. Mels, T., 2003. Landscape Unmasked:Kenneth Olwig and the Ghostly Relations between Concepts. Cultural Geographies, 10:379–387.
24. Meyer, E.K., 1997. “ The expanded field of landscape architecture ”. In Ecological Design and Planning, Edited by:Thompson, G.F., and Steiner, F.R., 45–79. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
25. Miller, P.A., 1997. A Profession in Peril? Landscape Architecture, 87 (8):66–71. 85–88
26. Murphy, M.D., 2005. Landscape Architecture Theory:Evolving Body of Thought, Long Grove:Waveland Press.
27. Olwig, K.R., 1996. Recovering the Substantive Meaning of Landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86 (4):630–653.
28. Pallasmaa, J., 2007. New Architectural Horizons. Architectural Design, 2:16–23.
29. Sarlöv-Herlin, I., New challenges in the field of spatial planning:landscapes. European Landscape Convention–Florence Convention. Second meeting of the workshops for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, Proceedings. November27–282003, Strasbourg. pp. 111–115. Council of Europe.
30. Simonsson, L., 2003. Landscape as an Arena for Applied Environmental Studies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 57:40–48.
31. Spirn, A.W., 1998. The Language of Landscape, New Haven and London:Yale University Press.
32. Spirn, A.W., 2008. “ The art seminar ”. In Landscape Theory, Edited by:De Lue, R.Z., and Elkins, J., 87–156. New York:Routledge.
33. Stiles, R., 1994. In search of a definition. Landscape Design, 234:44–48.
34. Swaffield, S., 2002. Social change and the Profession of Landscape Architecture in the Twenty-first Century. Landscape Journal, 21 (1):183–189.
35. Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P., and van den Brink, A., 2007. Incorporating Ecological Sustainability into Landscape Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79:374–384.
36. Thompson, I., 1998. Environmental Ethics and the Development of Landscape Architectural Theory. Landscape Research, 23 (2):175–194.
37. Thompson, I., 2000. Sources of Values in the Environmental Design Professions:The Case of Landscape Architecture. Ethics, Place and Environment, 3 (2):203–219.
38. Thwaites, K., 2000. Expressivist Landscape Architecture:The Development of a New Conceptual Framework for Landscape Architecture. Landscape Journal, 19 (1-2):201–210.
39. Tress, B., and Tress, G., 2001. Capitalising on Multiplicity:A Transdisciplinary Systems Approach to Landscape Research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57:143–157.
40. Tress, B., Tress, G., and van der Valk, A., 2003. “ Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Landscape Studies–The Wageningen DELTA approach ”. In Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies:Potential and Limitations, Edited by:Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., and Fry, G., 8–15. Wageningen:Delta Series. 2
41. Tress, B., Tress, G., De´campsb, H., and d'Hauteserrec, A.-M., 2001. Bridging Human and Natural Sciences in Landscape Research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57:137–141.
42. Van Mansvelt, J.D., Landscape, identity and integrity:towards sound knowledge, awareness and involvement. European Landscape Convention–Florence Convention. Second meeting of the workshops for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, Proceedings. November27–282003, Strasbourg. pp. 37–50. Council of Europe.
43. Wood, R., and Handley, J., 2001. Landscape Dynamics and the Management of Change. Landscape Research, 26 (1):45–54.