Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: A simulation approach

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, ICCM 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 31-36

  Cooper, Richard P ^a   Davelaar, Eddy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Executive processes; Individual differences; Response inhibition; Stop signal task; Stroop task

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE CONTROL; EXECUTIVE PROCESSES; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; STOP SIGNAL TASK; STROOP TASK;

EID: 79957862250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
2. Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review, 114, 376-397.
3. Cohen, J. D. & Huston, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds) (pp. 453-476). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
4. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
5. Davelaar, E. J., & Cooper, R. P. (2010). Modelling the correlation between two putative inhibition tasks: An analytic approach. In Catrambone, R., & Ohlsson, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society Incorporated, Portland, OR, USA.
6. Gilbert, S. & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
7. Goldberg, G., Mayer, N.H., & Toglia, J.U. (1981). Medial frontal cortex infarction and the alien hand sign. Archives of Neurology, 38, 683-686.
8. Lhermitte, F. (1983). Utilisation behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
9. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
10. Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
11. Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Norman, D.A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, and D. Shapiro (eds.) Consciousness and Self Regulation, Volume 4, pp. 1-18. Plenum: NY.
13. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.