Why do not we use finger pulse oximeter plethysmograph waveform to monitor the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Resuscitation

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 959-

  Xu, Jun ^a   Zhu, Huadong ^a   Wang, Zhong ^a   Yu, Xuezhong ^a   Walline, Joseph ^b  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL GAS; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; HUMAN; LETTER; PLETHYSMOGRAPH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETER; RESUSCITATION; RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OXIMETRY; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79957841622     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.030     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Nolan J.P., Soar J., Zideman D.A., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010, 81:1219-1276.
2. Reisner A., Shaltis P.A., McCombie D. Utility of the photoplethysmogram in circulatory monitoring. Anesthesiology 2008, 108:950-958.
3. Pizov R., Eden A., Bystritski D. Arterial and plethysmographic waveform analysis in anesthetized patients with hypovolemia. Anesthesiology 2010, 113:83-91.
4. Cote C.J., Goldstein E.A., Fuchsman W.H., Hoaglin D.C. The effect of nail polish on pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg 1988, 67:683-686.