From Performance Analysis to Training Needs Assessment

Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 144-183

  Burner, Kerry J ^a  

^a WALDEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral engineering model and six boxes model; Needs assessment plan dimensions and sources; Performance analysis to training needs assessment; Rossett's four opportunities sources and sequences; Simultaneous performance analysis and training needs assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957838884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470587089.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Binder, C. (1998). The six boxes: A descendent of Gilbert's behavior engineering model. Performance Improvement, 37(6), 48-52.
2. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2002). Turning research into results: A guide to selecting the right performance solutions. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
3. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley, Longman.
4. Foshay, W., Silber, K., & Westgaard, O. (1986). Instructional design competencies: The standards. Iowa City, IA: International Board of Standards for Training, Performance, and Instruction.
5. Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Gilbert, T. F. (1996). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance (tribute ed.). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
7. Greer, M. (1992). ID project management: Tools and techniques for instructional designers and developers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
8. Gupta, K. (1999). A practical guide to needs assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Harless, J. (1973). An analysis of front-end analysis. Improving Human Performance: A Research Quarterly, 4, 229-244.
10. Harless, J. (1975). An ounce of analysis is worth a pound of objectives. Newnan, GA: Harless Performance Guild.
11. ISPI's Performance Technology Standards. (2002). Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.
12. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and illstructured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 45(1), 65-95.
13. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a meta-theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 48(4), 63-85.
14. Kaufman, R. A. (1985). Needs assessment, needs analysis, objectives and evaluation. Performance & Instruction, 24(6), 21.
15. Kaufman, R. A. (2000). Mega planning: Practical tools for organizational success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Kaufman, R. A. (2005). Defining and delivering measurable value: A mega thinking and planning primer. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(3), 6-16.
17. Kaufman, R. A., & Valentine, G. (1989). Relating needs assessment and needs analysis. Performance & Instruction Journal, 28(10), 10-14.
18. Langdon, D. G., & Whiteside, K. S. (1997). The performance technologist's role in interventions: An interview with Joe Harless. Performance Improvement, 36(10), 36-38.
19. Mager, R., & Pipe, P. (1984). Analyzing performance problems (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Fearon.
20. Pershing, J. A. (2006). Human performance technology fundamentals. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, potential (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
21. Piskurich, G. M., Beckschi, P., & Hall, B. (Eds.). (2000). The ASTD handbook of training design and delivery: A comprehensive guide to creating and delivering training programs-Instructor-led, computer-based, or self-directed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
23. Rossett, A. (1982) A typology for generating needs assessment. Journal of Instructional Development, 6(1), 28-33.
24. Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
25. Rossett, A. (1999). First things fast: A handbook for performance analysis. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
26. Rossett, A. (2006). Analysis and more. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, potential (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
27. Rothwell, W. J., Hohne C. K., & King, S. B. (2007). Human performance improvement: Building practitioner competence (improving human performance) (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
28. Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1998). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
29. Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1990). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Svenson, R. (2006). Requirements: The bridge between analysis and design. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, potential (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
31. Walonick, D. S. (2004). Survival statistics. Minneapolis, MN: StatPac.
32. Watkins, R. (2006). Aligning human performance technology decisions with an organization's strategic direction. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, potential (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
33. Watkins, R., & Kaufman, R. A. (1996). An update on relating needs assessment and needs analysis. Performance Improvement, 35(10), 10-16.
34. Zemke, R., & Kramlinger, T. (1982). Figuring things out: A trainer's guide to needs and task analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.