Responsiveness of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) in individuals with diabetes

Foot

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 84-87

  Kivlan, Benjamin R ^a   Martin, RobRoy L ^a,d   Wukich, Dane K ^b,c  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Foot and ankle ability measure; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANKLE FRACTURE; ANKLE INJURY; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CELLULITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; FEMALE; FIBULA FRACTURE; FLATFOOT; FOOT AMPUTATION; FOOT AND ANKLE ABILITY MEASURE; FOOT DISEASE; FOOT FRACTURE; FOOT MALFORMATION; FOOT SURGERY; FOOT ULCER; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; LEG AMPUTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOCHONDROSIS; OSTEOMYELITIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PLANTAR FASCIITIS; POLYARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT FORM 36; TIBIA FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE INJURIES; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPATHY, NEUROGENIC; DIABETIC FOOT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957823936     PISSN: 09582592     EISSN: 15322963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Diabetes Association, National Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2007, http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/.
2. Margolis D.J., Allen-Taylor L., Hoffstad O., Berlin J.A. Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and amputation. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2005, 13:230-236.
3. Moulik P.K., Mtonga R., Gill G.V. Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care 2003, 26:491-494.
4. Valk G.D., Kriegsman D.M., Assendelft W.J. Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database System Review 2005, CD001488. [Review 1].
5. Bann C.M., Fehnel S.E., Gagnon DD Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF). Pharmacoeconomics 2003, 21:1277-1290.
6. Bastyr E.J., Price K.L., Bril V. Development and validity testing of the neuropathy total symptom score-6: questionnaire for the study of sensory symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clinical Therapeutics 2005, 27:1278-1294.
7. Bott U., Muhlhauser I., Overmann H., Berger M. Validation of a diabetes specific quality-of-life scale for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:757-769.
8. Bradley C., Todd C., Gorton T., Symonds E., Martin A., Plowright R. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Quality of Life Research 1999, 8:79-91.
9. Bril V., Perkins B.A. Validation of the Toronto Clinical Scoring System for diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care 2002, 25:2048-2052.
10. Carey M.P., Jorgensen R.S., Weinstock R.S., Sprafkin R.P., Lantinga L.J., Carnrike C.L., et al. Reliability and validity of the appraisal of diabetes scale. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1991, 14:43-51.
11. Cornblath D.R., Chaudhry V., Carter K., Lee D., Seysedadr M., Miernicki M. Total neuropathy score: validation and reliability study. Neurology 1999, 53:1660-1664.
12. Dhawan V., Spratt K.F., Pinzur M.S., Baumhauer J., Rudicel S., Saltzman C.L. Reliability of AOFAS diabetic foot questionnaire in Charcot arthropathy: stability, internal consistency, and measurable difference. Foot and Ankle International 2005, 26:717-731.
13. Evans A.R., Pinzur M.S. Health-related quality of life of patients with diabetes and foot ulcers. Foot and Ankle International 2005, 26:32-37.
14. Feldman E.L., Stevens M.J., Thomas P.K., Brown M.B., Canal N., Greene D.A. A practical two-step quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1994, 17:1281-1289.
15. Garratt A.M., Schmidt L., Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabetic Medicine 2002, 19:1-11.
16. Jacobson A.M., de Groot M., Samson J.A. The evaluation of two measures of quality of life in patients with type I and type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994, 17:267-274.
17. Meadows K., Steen N., McColl E., Eccles M., Shiels C., Hewison J., et al. The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychosocial profile of insulin requiring patients-development and psychometric evaluation. Quality of Life Research 1996, 5:242-254.
18. Shen W., Kotsanos J.G., Huster W.J., Mathias S.D., Andrejasich C.M., Patrick D.L. Development and validation of the diabetes quality of life clinical trial questionnaire. Medical Care 1999, 37(4). [Supplement AS45-66].
19. Talbot F., Nouwen A., Gingras J., Gosselin M., Audet J. The assessment of diabetes-related cognitive and social factors: the multidimensional diabetes questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1997, 20:291-312.
20. Martin R.L., Irrgang J.J., Burdett R.G., Conti S.F., Van Swearingen J.M. Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot and Ankle International 2005, 26:968-983.
21. Martin R.L., Hutt D.M., Wukich D.K. Validity of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) in Diabetes mellitus. Foot and Ankle International 2009, 30:297-302.
22. Bayliss E.A., Bayliss M.S., Ware J.E., Steiner J.F. Predicting declines in physical function in persons with multiple chronic medical conditions: what we can learn from the medical problem list. Health Quality of Life Outcomes 2004, 2:247.
23. Cook C.E. Clinimetrics corner: the minimal clinically important change score (MCID): a necessary pretense. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2008, 16:E82-83.
24. Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G.H. Measurement of health status, ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 1989, 10:407-415.
25. Johanson N.A., Liang M.H., Daltroy L., Rudicel S., Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 2004, 86-A:902-909.
26. Budiman-Mak E., Conrad K.J., Roach K.E. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1991, 44:561-570.
27. Hefferan G., Khan F., Awan N., Riordain C.O., Corigan J. A comparison of outcome scores in os calcis fractures. Irish Journal of Medical Sciences 2000, 169:127-128.
28. Karlsson J., Peterson L. Evaluation of the ankle joint function: the use of a scoring scale. The Foot 1991, 1:15-19.
29. Roos E.M., Brandsson S., Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot and Ankle International 2001, 22:788-794.
30. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Katz J.N., Wright J.G., Wells G., Boers M., et al. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology. Minimal clinically important difference. Journal of Rheumatology 2001, 28:400-405.
31. Wells G., Anderson J., Beaton D., Bellamy N., Boers M., Bombardier C., et al. Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. Journal of Rheumatology 2001, 28:452-454.
32. Hays R.D, Woolley J.M. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?. Pharmacoeconomics 2000, 18:419-423.
33. Haley S.M., Fragala-Pinkham M.A. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 2006, 86:735-743.
34. Brunner H.I., Higgins G.C., Klein-Gitelman M.S., Lapidus S.K., Olson J.C., Onel K., et al. Minimal clinically important differences of disease activity indices in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Research 2010, 62:950-959.
35. Martin R.L., Philippon M.J. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy 2008, 24:676-682.
36. Guyatt G.H., Osoba D., Wu A.W., Wyrwich K.W., Norman G.R. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002, 77:371-383.
37. Cella D., Bullinger M., Scott C., Barofsky I. Group vs individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002, 77:384-392.
38. Ware J.E., Bayliss M.S., Rogers W.H., Kosinski M., Tarlov A.R. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Journal of the American Medical Association 1996, 276:1039-1047.