Refined techniques for data processing and two-dimensional inversion in magnetotelluric II: Which data polarization mode should be used in 2D inversion

Acta Geophysica Sinica

Volumn 53, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2703-2714

  Cai, Jun Tao ^a,b   Chen, Xiao Bin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (China)

^b Jiangsu Earthquake Administration   (China)

Author keywords

Magnetotelluric; Polarization mode; Three dimensional modeling; Two dimensional inversion

Indexed keywords

DATA INVERSION; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; POLARIZATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 79957822215     PISSN: 00015733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chen X B, Zhao G Z, Ma X. Preliminary discussion on selecting rotation direction in 2-4) MT inversion. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 2008, 43(1):113-118
2. Wannamaker P E, Hohmann G W, Ward S H. Magneiotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths. Geophysics, 1984, 49(9):1517-1533
3. Wannamaker P E, Booker J R, Jonevs A G, et al. Resistivity cross section through the Juan de Fuca subduction system and its tectonic implications, Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94 (B10): 14127-14144
4. Banks R J, Livelybrooks D, Jones P, et al. Causes of high crustal conductivity beneath the lapetus suture zone in Great Britain. Geophys J Int, 1996, 124:133-455
5. Chen X B, Zhao G Z, Ma X. Research on inversion of MT 3D model approximately by 1D, 2D inversion method. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics (in Chinese). 2006, 3(1):9-15
6. Berdichevsky M N, Dmitriev V I. Magnetotellurics in the context of the theory of ill-posed problems. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2002
7. Berdichevsky M N, Dmitriev V J, Pozdnjakova E E. On twodimensional interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings. Geophys J Int. 1998, 133:585-606
8. Berdichevsky M N, Dmitriev V I, Kuznetsov V A. Bimodal two-dimensional interpretation of magnetotelluric sounding. Physics of the Solid Earth, 1996, 31(10):821-837 (Pubitemid 126703926)
9. Ledo J. 2-D versus 3-D magnetotelluric data interpretation. Surv Geophys, 2006, 27:511-543
10. Xiao Q B. Application study of magnetoteliuric inversion method comparison and visualization [Ph. D. thesis. Beijing: Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2004
11. Maekie R L, Madden T R, Wannamaker P E. Threedimcnsional magnetoteliuric modeling using difference equations - Theory and comparisons to integral equation solutions. Geophysics, 1993, 58(2):215-226 (Pubitemid 23391344)
12. Chen X B, Zhang X, Hu W B. Application of finite-element direct iteration algorithm to MT 2-D forward computation. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 2000, 35(1):487-496
13. Chen X B, Zhao G Z, Zhan Y. A visual integrated windows system for MT data process and interpretation. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 2004, 39 (Suppl.): 11-16
14. Rodi W, Maekie R L. Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetoteliuric inversion. Geophysics. 2001, 66(1):174-187 (Pubitemid 32281938)
15. Li D Z, Huang Q H, Chen X B. Error effects on magnetoteliuric inversion. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2009, 52(1):268-274
16. deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetoteliuric data. Geophysics, 1990, 55(12):1613-1624