The cogency of risk assessments

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 270-296

  Coyle, Ian R ^a  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Actuarial measures; Expert evidence; Preventative detention; Public policy; Risk assessment; Sex offenders; Structured professional judgement; Supervision orders

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957819630     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2010.543406     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abbott, B.R. (2009). Applicability of the new Static-99 experience tables in sexually violent predator risk assessments. Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(1), 1-28. Retrieved March 2010, from www.sexuallofender.org
2. Allan, M., Grace, R.C., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S.M. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sex Abuse, 19, 347-367.
3. Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
4. Baumgartner, J.V., Scalora, M.J., & Huss, M.T. (2002). Assessment of the Wilson sex fantasy questionnaire among child molesters and nonsexual forensic offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(1), 19-30.
5. Black-Clawson Ltd v Papierwerke AG. (1975). AC 591 p. 638 (Lord Diplock).
6. Board of Fire Commissioners (NSW) v Ardouin. (1961). HCA 71; 109 CLR 105, p. 116.
7. Boccaccini, M.T., Murrie, D.C., Caperton, J.D., & Hawes, S. W. (2009). Field validity of the Static-99 and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 15, 278-314.
8. Boer, D.P., Hart, S.D., Kropp, P.R., & Webster, C.D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20. Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, Canada: The Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
9. Campbell, T.W. (2003). Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: Ethical considerations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 269-279.
10. Chun, B.J.D.H., & Dunner, D.L. (2004). A review of anti-depressant-induced hypomania in major depression: Suggestions for DSM-V. Bipolar Disorders, 6, 32-42.
11. Collie, R.M., Ward, T., & Vess, J. (2008). Sex offenders. In K. Fritzon & P. Wilson (Eds.), Forensic psychology and criminology: An Australian perspective (pp. 87-101). Sydney, NSW, Australia: McGraw Hill.
12. Colvin, E. (2009). Convicting the innocent: A critique of theories of wrongful convictions. Criminal Law Forum, 20, 173-192.
13. Cooke, D.J. (2010). More prejudicial than probative? The Journal, January 2010, 20-23. Retrieved October 2010, from www.journal online.co.uk
14. Cooke, D.J., & Michie, C. (2009). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34(40), 259-274.
15. Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill. (1991). 172 CLR 319, p. 321 (Brennan J).
16. Coyle, I.R. (2008). Pre-sentence reports and risk assessment. In K. Frizton & P. Wilson (Eds.), Forensic psychology and criminology: An Australian perspective (pp. 251-266). Sydney, NSW, Australia: McGraw Hill.
17. Coyle, I.R., Field, D., & Wenderoth, P. (2009). Pattern recognition and forensic identification: The presumption of scientific accuracy and other falsehoods. Criminal Law Journal, 33, 214-226.
18. Craig, L.A., & Beech, A.R. (2010). Towards a guide to best practice in conducting actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 278-293.
19. Craig, L.A., Browne, K.D., & Stringer, I. (2003). Risk scales and factors predictive of sexual offence recidivism. Trauma Violence and Abuse, 4(1), 45-69.
20. Daleiden, E.L., Kaufman, K.L., Hilliker, D.R., & O'Neil, J.N. (1998). The sexual histories and fantasies of youthful males: A comparison of sexual offending, nonsexual offending, and non-offending groups. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 190-209.
21. Davis, M.R., & Ogloff, J.R.P. (2008). Risk assessment. In K. Frizton & P. Wilson (Eds.), Forensic psychology and criminology: An Australian perspective (pp. 141-150). Sydney, NSW, Australia: McGraw Hill.
22. Department of Corrections v Kingi. (2008). HC WANG CRI 2007, 488, 14.
23. de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, Behavioral Science, 28(3), 235-251.
24. Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v Mangolamara (2007). WASC 71.
25. Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v Free (2010). WASC 255.
26. Donaldson v Broomby. (1982). 40 ALR 525.
27. Dowden, C., Antonowicz, D., & Andrews, D.A. (2003). The effectiveness of relapse prevention with offenders: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(5), 516-528.
28. Flynn, A. (2010). Victoria's legal aid funding structure; hindering the ideals inherent to the pre-trial process. Criminal Law Journal, 34(1), 48-63.
29. Freckelton, I., & Keyzer, P. (2010). Indefinite detention of sex offenders and human rights: The intervention of the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(3), 345-354.
30. Freckelton, I., & Selby, H. (2009). Expert evidence: Law, practice, procedure and advocacy (4th ed.). Sydney: Thomson-Reuters.
31. Gardner, W., Lidz, C.W., Mulvey, E.P., & Shaw, E.C. (1996). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 602-609.
32. Gelb, K. (2007). Recidivism of sex offenders research paper. Melbourne, Victoria: Sentence Advisory Council.
33. Gottfedson, M.R., & Hirschi T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Hanson, R.K. (2003). Who is dangerous and when are they safe? Risk assessment with sexual offenders. In B.J. Winnick & J.Q. Lafond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 63-74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348-362.
36. Hanson, R.K., Gordon, A., Harris, A.J.R., Marques, J.K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V.L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
37. Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
38. Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J., Scott, T.L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada.
39. Hanson, R.K., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2010). Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study of the Static-2002. Law and Human Behaviour, 34(3), 198-211.
40. Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Long term recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 989, 154-166.
41. Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154-1163.
42. Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A metaanalysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1-21.
43. Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessment for sex offenders. Ottowa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada.
44. Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behaviour, 24, 119-136.
45. Hare, R.D. (2004). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) (2nd ed.). New York: MHS, p. 8.
46. Hart, S.D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D.J. (2007a). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the margins of error of group v individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190 (Suppl. 49), s60-s65.
47. Hart, S.D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D.J. (2007b). Authors reply. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 561-562.
48. Helmus, L., Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2009). Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms. The Forum, 21(1), 38-45.
49. Howitt, D., & Sheldon, K. (2007). The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology Crime and Law, 13, 469-486.
50. Joliffe, D., & Farrington, D.P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476.
51. Keyzer, P. (2006). Dangerous prisoners. Sydney: Halsted Press.
52. Keyzer, P. (2008). Preserving due process or warehousing the undesirables? To what end the separation of judicial power of the commonwealth? Sydney Law Review, 30, 101-114.
53. Keyzer, P., & Coyle, I.R. (2009). Reintegrating sex offenders into the community: Queensland's proposed reforms. Alternate Law Journal, 34(1), 27-30.
54. Kropp, P.R., & Hart, S.D. (2000). The spousal assault risk assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101-118.
55. La Fond, J.Q. (2005). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
56. Langevin, R., Curnoe, S., Federoff, P., Bennett, R., Langevin, M., Peever, C., et al. (2004, October). Lifetime sex offender recidivism: A 25 year follow-up study. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 531-552.
57. Litwack, T.R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(2), 409-443.
58. Lussier, P., Tzoumakis, S., Cale, J., & Amirault, J. (2010). Criminal trajectories of adult sex offenders and the age effect: Examining the dynamic aspect of offending. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 147-168.
59. Makita v Sprowles. (2001). NSWCA 52 NSWLR 705.
60. Marques, J.K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & van Omeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's sex offender treatment and evaluation project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
61. Marshall, W.L. (1998). The use of sexually explicit stimuli by rapists, child molesters and non-offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 267-288.
62. Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behaviour: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63. Monahan, J., & Steadman, H.J. (Eds.). (1994). Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64. Mossman, S., & Sellke, T. (2007). Avoiding errors about 'margins of error.' British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 561.
65. Phenix, A., Doren, D., Helmus, L., Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2008). Coding Rules for the Static 2002. Retrieved March 2010, from www.static99
66. Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Cormier, C.A. (1999). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
67. Quinsey, V.L., La Lumiere, M.K., Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Predicting sexual offences. In J.C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Potential for further violence of sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 114-137). CA: Thousand Oaks.
68. Rogers, R., & Jackson, R.L. (2005). Sexually violent predators: The risky business of risk assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 33(40), 523-528.
69. Rettenberger, M., Matthes, A., Boer, D.P., & Eher, R. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 169-186, 176.
70. Schumcker, M., & Lösell, F. (2008). Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicotherma, 20(1), 10-19.
71. Schweitzer, R., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(11), 1292-1310.
72. Seager, J.A., Jellicoe, D., & Dhaliwal, G.K. (2004). Refusers, dropouts, and completers: Measuring sex offender treatment efficacy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(5), 600-612.
73. Seto, M., Maric, A., & Barabaree, H.E. (2001). The role of pornography in the aetiology of sexual aggression. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 6, 35-53.
74. Smallbone, S.W., & Wortley, R.K. (2001). Child sexual abuse: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Australian Institute of Criminology, Trends and issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 193, 1-6.
75. Smith v Corrective Services Commissioner (NSW). (1980). 33 LAR 25.
76. Sreenivasan, S., Weinberger, L.E., Frances, A., & Cusworth-Walker, S. (2010). Alice in actuarial-land: Through the looking glass of changing Static-99 norms. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 38, 400-406.
77. Steadman, H.J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P.S., Robbins, P.C., Mulvey, E.P., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83-100.
78. Swets, J.A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
79. Thornton, D., Hanson, R.K., & Helmus, L. (2010). Moving beyond the standard model for actuarial assessment for sexual offenders. Retrieved October 2010, from www. ccoso.org/newsletter/movingbeyondstandard.doc
80. Tittle, C.R., Ward, D.A., & Gasmick, H.G. (2004). Capacity for self-control and individual's interest in exercising self-control. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(2), 143-172.
81. Vella v Grey. (1985). 61 ALR 210.
82. Vess, J., & Eccleston, L. (2009). Extended supervision of sexual offenders in Australia and New Zealand: Differences in implementation across jurisdictions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(2), 271-287.
83. Ward, T., & Hudson, S.M. (2000). Sexual offenders implicit planning: A conceptual model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 189-202.
84. Watson v Marshall (1971). 124 CLR 621.
85. Webster, C.D., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. (1997). HCR-20 assessing risk for violence: Version 2. Burnaby, Canada, Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
86. Webster, C.D., Müller-Isberner, R., & Fransson, G. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Using structured clinical guides professionally. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 43-51.
87. Wilson, R.L., Stewart, L., Stirpe, T., Barrett, M., & Cripps, J.E. (2000). Community-based sex offender management: Combining parole supervision and treatment to reduce recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 177-188.
88. Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes's theorem. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 12, 56-85.