The trend in total cost of back pain in the netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1050-1058

  Lambeek, Ludeke C ^a   Van Tulder, Maurits W ^b   Swinkels, Ilse C S ^c   Koppes, Lando L J ^d   Anema, Johannes R ^a,e   Van Mechelen, Willlem ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^d TNO   (Netherlands)

^e TNO Quality of Life ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cost of illness study; low back pain

Indexed keywords

BENZODIAZEPINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OPIATE; PARACETAMOL;

ARTICLE; BACKACHE; COST OF ILLNESS; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISABILITY; DISEASE REGISTRY; DRUG COST; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREND STUDY;

ABSENTEEISM; ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; AMBULATORY CARE; ANALGESICS; BACK PAIN; COST OF ILLNESS; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; DRUG COSTS; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; INSURANCE, DISABILITY; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SICK LEAVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79957802324     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e70488     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, et al. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:419-26.
2. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Poos M J J C. Neemt het aantal mensen met nek-en rugklachten toe of af? In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, National Kompas Volksgezondheid 2006.
3. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008;8:8-20. (Pubitemid 350299273)
4. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U. S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2724-7. (Pubitemid 44673384)
5. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health 2003;15:79-87. (Pubitemid 38326437)
6. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain 1995;62:233-40.
7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Transforming disability into ability. Policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. 2003.
8. Bekkering GE, Hendriks H J M, Koes BW, et al. Clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain. [In Dutch: KNGF-richtlijn Lage-rugpijn.]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Fysiotherapie 2001.
9. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO. Clinical guidelines for non-specific low back pain. [In Dutch: Richtlijn aspecifieke lagerugklachten]. Utrecht, The Netherland: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO; 2003.
10. Verbeek JH, Anema JR, Everaert C P J, et al., NVAB-Richtlijn Handelen van de bedrijfsarts bij werknemers met Lage-Rugklachten. Utrecht, The Netherland: Kwaliteitsbureau NVAB; 2006.
11. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/nl- NL/menu/themas/arbeid-sociale-zekerheid/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2008/ 2008-90122-wk.htm. Accessed November 5, 2009.
12. Kooijman MK, Swinkels I C S, Leemrijse C, et al., Landelijke Informatievoorziening Paramedische Zorg (LiPZ) [In Dutch]. Utrecht, The Netherland: Prismant; 2009.
13. Prismant. Classification of Procedures (CνV). Standaard classifi-catie van medisch specialistische verrichtingen [In Dutch]. Urecht, The Netherland: Prismant; 2005.
14. Prismant. Landelijke Medische Registratie 2002-2007;2009.
15. Verheij RA, Abrahamse H, Davids R, et al., Netherlands Information Network of General Practice: Facts and Figures on Dutch GP Care. Utrecht, The Netherland: Nivel; 2009.
16. Struijs JN, Baan CA, Slobbe L C J, et al., Koppeling van anonieme huisartsgegevens aan ziekenhuisregistraties. RIVM rapport 282701006/2004. Bilthoven, The Netherland: RIVM; 2004.
17. Cardol M, van Dijk L, de Jong JD, et al., Tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Huisartsenzorg: wat doet de poortwachter? Utrecht/Bilthoven, The Netherland: NIVEL/RIVM; 2004.
18. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Metsemakers JF, et al. Chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study on the management and course. Fam Pract 1998;15:126-32. (Pubitemid 28200889)
19. Paas G R A, Veenhuizen K C W. Research of the reliability of the LMR, report for hospitals. In: Dutch: Onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid van de LMR, rapportage voor de ziekenhuizen. Utrecht, The Netherland: Prismant; 2002.
20. Swinkels I C S. Monitoring Physiotherapy Using a National Registration Network; 2008.
21. Z-index. G-Standaard. The Hague: the Netherlands: Z-index; 2006.
22. Health Care Insurance Board. Farmaceutisch Kompas; 2009.
23. Koopmanschap MA, van Ineveld BM. Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease. Soc Sci Med 1992;34:1005-10.
24. Jehoel-Gijsbers G (Ed.). Beter aan het werk. Trendrapportage ziekteverzuim, arbeidsongeschiktheid en werkhervatting. Den Haag: SCP/CBS/TNO Kwaliteit van Leven; 2007.
25. Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Prinsze FJ, et al. Changes in the incidence of occupational disability as a result of back and neck pain in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2006;6:190.
26. Wenig CM, Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T, et al. Costs of back pain in Germany. Eur J Pain 2009;13:280-6.
27. Hutubessy RC, van Tulder MW, Vondeling H. Indirect costs of back pain in the Netherlands: human capital or friction cost method? Annu Meet Int Soc Technol Assess Health Care Int Soc Technol Assess Health Care Meet 1996;12.
28. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, et al. Disability Prevention. New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001;9:351-60. (Pubitemid 32673727)
29. Waddell G, Burton AK, Aylward M. A biopsychosocial model of sickness and disability. AMA Guides Newsletter. ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008:1-13.
30. Hlobil H, Staal JB, Spoelstra M, et al. Effectiveness of a returntowork intervention for subacute low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:249-57. (Pubitemid 41226931)
31. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van TM, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:262-9. (Pubitemid 32144124)
32. van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, de Vet HC, et al. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD006955.
33. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 2002;20:443-54. (Pubitemid 34804173)
34. Lamberts H, Wood M. International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University; 1987.
35. Slee VN. The international classification of diseases: ninth revision (ICD-9). Ann Intern Med 1978;88:424-6.
36. Ouwehand P, Wouters P H M. Classificaties voor Arbo en SV: classificatie van klachten, ziekten en oorzaken voor bedrijfs-en verzekeringsartsen. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Voorlichtingscentrum Sociale Verzekering; 1997.