Surface energy characterization of three partially hydrolyzed hardwood species determined by dynamic contact angle analysis

Journal of Adhesion

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 353-365

  McConnell, T Eric ^a   Shi, Sheldon Q ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic contact angle; Hardwood; Partial hydrolysis; Surface energy

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE TREATMENT; DISPERSIVE FORCES; DYNAMIC CONTACT ANGLE; DYNAMIC CONTACT-ANGLE ANALYSIS; GEOMETRIC MEAN; HARDWOOD SPECIES; PARTIAL HYDROLYSIS; PARTIALLY HYDROLYZED; RED OAK; SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTIONS; SURFACE ENERGIES; SURFACE ENERGY; WILHELMY PLATE TECHNIQUE; WOOD BEAMS; YELLOW-POPLAR;

CONTACT ANGLE; FORESTRY; HYDROLYSIS; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; ROLLING RESISTANCE; SODIUM; SULFURIC ACID; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

HARDWOODS;

CHEMISTRY; CONTACT ANGLE; FORESTRY; HARDWOODS; HYDROLYSIS; INTERFACES; ROLLING; SODIUM; SULFURIC ACID; SURFACE ENERGY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79957800822     PISSN: 00218464     EISSN: 15455823     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2011.562111     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Chen, C., Forest Prod. J. 20, 36-41 (1968).
2. Thomas, R., in Wood Technology: Chemical Aspects, I. Goldstein (Ed.) (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1977), Ch. 1, p. 21.
3. Parham, R. and Gray, R., in The Chemistry of Solid Wood, R. M. Rowell (Ed.) (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1984), Ch. 1, pp. 43-45.
4. Beech, J., Holzforschung 29, 11-18 (1975).
5. Carll, C., USDA Forest Prod. Lab. GTR-96, 10 pp. (1996).
6. Halligan, A., Wood Sci. Technol. 4, 301-312 (1970).
7. Gilbert, N., Hobbs, I., and Sandberg, W., Forest Prod. J. 3, 43-48 (1952).
8. Ragauskas, A., Nagy, M., Kim, D., Eckert, C., Hallett, J., and Liotta, C., Ind. Biotechnol. 12, 55-65 (2006).
9. Schultz, T., Biermann, C., McGinnis, G., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 22, 344-348 (1983).
10. Sun, Y. and Cheng, J., Bioresour. Technol. 83, 1-11 (2002).
11. Yoon, H., Korean J. Chem. Eng. 15, 631-636 (1998).
12. Fernando, S., Adhikari, S., Chandrapel, C., and Murali, N., Energ. Fuel. 20, 1727-1737 (2006).
13. Haupt, R. and Sellers, Jr., T., Forest Prod. J. 44, 69-73 (1994).
14. Paredes, J., Mills, R., Shaler, S., Gardner, D., van Heiningen, A., Wood Fiber Sci. 41, 38-50 (2009).
15. Bryant, B., Forest Prod. J. 18, 157-162 (1968).
16. Nearn, W., Wood Sci. 6, 285-293 (1974).
17. Larmore, F., Forest Prod. J. 9, 131-134 (1959).
18. TM Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, 89 pp (2010).
19. Gray, V., Forest Prod. J. 12, 452-461 (1962).
20. Young, T., Phil. Trans. 95:65 (1805).
21. Herczeg, A., Forest Prod. J. 15, 499-505 (1965).
22. Son, J. and Gardner, D., Wood Fiber Sci. 36, 98-106 (2004).
23. Wålinder, M. E. P. and Johansson, I., Holzforschung 55, 21-32 (2001).
24. Wu, W., Giese, Jr., R., and van Oss, C., Langmuir 11, 379-382 (1995).
25. Girafalco, L. and Good, R., J. Phys. Chem. 61, 904 (1957).
26. Fowkes, F., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 382 (1962).
27. Gardner, D., Wood Fiber Sci. 28, 422-428 (1996).
28. Shi, Q., Gardner, D., and Wang, J., in Proc. Int. Conf. Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, (Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI, 1997), pp. 245-256.
29. SAS Institute, Version 9.1.3, Cary, NC (2003).
30. Manwiller, F. G., in Utilization of Southern Hardwoods Growing on Southern Pine Sites, Peter Koch (Ed.) (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1985), Ch. 6, p. 453.
31. Rowe, J. and Connor, A., USDA Forest Prod. Lab. GTR-18, 72 pp. (1979).
32. de Meijer, M., Haemers, S., Cobben, W., and Militz, H., Langmuir 16, 9352-9359 (2000).
33. Connor, A., Wood Fiber Sci. 16, 268-277 (1984).
34. Stephen, R. and Kutscha, N., Wood Fiber Sci. 19, 353-361 (1987).
35. Wangaard, F., Forest Prod. J. 16, 53-64 (1966).
36. Koch, P., Utilization of Hardwoods Growing on Southern Pine Sites. Volume I: The Raw Material, (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1985).
37. Stehr, M., Gardner, D., and Walinder, M., J. Adhesion 76, 185-200 (2001).