Using the AQAL framework to accelerate responses to climate change

Journal of Integral Theory and Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 43-59

  Ballard, David ^a   Reason, Peter ^a   Coleman, Gill ^a  

^a Alexander Ballard Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AQAL framework; Barriers; Climate change; Lock in; Mitigation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957799414     PISSN: 19445083     EISSN: 19445091     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Alley, R. B. (2000). The two mile time machine: Ice cores, abrupt climate change and our future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Anderson, K., & Bows, A. (2008). Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3863-3882.
3. Ballard, D. I. (2005). Using learning processes to promote change for sustainable development. Action Research, 3, 135-156.
4. Ballard, D. I. (2007). Developing strategic capacity to respond to climate change. Organizations and People, Special Issue on Sustainable Development, November 2007.
5. Ballard, D. I., & Alexander, S. J. (2008). Adaptive capacity benchmarking: A handbook and toolkit. Winchester, UK: Hampshire County Council for the ESPACE Project.
6. Ballard, D. I., & Malnick, T. (2006). Behaviour change, water and the environment agency. Bristol, United Kingdom: The Environment Agency.
7. Beck, D. E. & Cowan, C. C. (2005). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering values, leadership and change. NJ: WileyBlackwell.
8. Bradbury, H. (1998). Learning with The Natural Step: Co-operative ecological inquiry through cases, theory, and practice for sustainable development. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Boston, MA: Carroll Graduate School of Management, Boston College.
9. Cook-Greuter, S. (1999). Postautonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
10. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2003). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
11. Foxon, T. J. (2003). Inducing innovation for a low-carbon future: Drivers, barriers and policies. London, United Kingdom: Carbon Trust.
12. Fritz, R. (1989). The Path of Least Resistance. New York, NY: Fawcett Books.
13. Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399-417.
14. Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In: W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292-317). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
15. IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In M. L. Parry, O. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
16. Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London, United Kingdom: Hutchinson.
17. Llewellyn, J. (2007). The business of climate change: Challenges and opportunities. London, United Kingdom: Lehman Brothers.
18. Macnaghten, P., Grove-White, R., Jacobs, M., & Wynne, B. (1995). Public perceptions and sustainability in Lancashire. Lancaster, United Kingdom: Lancashire County Council.
19. Macy, J. R., & Brown, M. Y. (1998). Coming back to life: Practices to reconnect our lives, our world. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
20. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
21. Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviours: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33, 181-208.
22. Pettigrew, A. M., Whittington, R., Melin, L., Sánchez-Runde, C., van den Bosch, F. A. J., Ruigrok, W., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Innovative forms of organizing: International perspectives. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
23. Reason, P. W., Coleman, G., Ballard, D. I., Williams, M., Gearty, M., Bond, C., Seeley, C., et al. (2009). Insider voices: Human dimensions of low carbon technology. Research Report for the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council and for the Economic and Sociology Research Council. Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice, University of Bath, United Kingdom. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from www.bath.ac.uk/management/news_events/pdf/lowcarbon_insider_voices.pdf.
24. Rentschler, M. (2006). AQAL glossary. AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(3), 1-39.
25. Rotmans, J., & de Vries, B. (1997). Perspectives on global change: The TARGETS approach. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
26. Scheer, H. (2007). Energy autonomy: The economic, social and technological case for renewable energy: London, United Kingdom: Earthscan.
27. Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Schein, E. H. (1995). Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systems Practice. Retrieved January 5, 2010, from http://www.solonline.org/res/wp/10006.html#back1.
29. Sjöberg, L. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 219-225.
30. Sterman, J. D., & Booth Sweeney, L. (2002). Cloudy skies: Assessing public understanding of global warming. Systems Dynamics Review, 18(4), 207-240.
31. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Oxford: Westview Press.
32. Unruh, G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817-830.
33. Wilber, K. (2000a). Integral psychology: Consciousness, spirit, psychology, therapy. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
34. Wilber, K. (2000b). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Dublin, Ireland: Gateway.