Economic impacts of the ShakeOut scenario

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 539-557

  Rose, Adam ^a   Wei, Dan ^a   Wein, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO; ECONOMIC IMPACTS; ECONOMIC RECESSION; PROPERTY DAMAGE; RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION; SERVICE OUTAGE; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; WATER SERVICE;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 79957697353     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3587204     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1991. Seismic Vulnerability and Impacts of Disruptions of Utility Lifelines in the Cotermininous United States, Report ATC-25, Applied Technology Council, Redwood, CA.
2. Burns, W. J., and Slovic, P., 2007. The diffusion of fear: Modeling community response to a terrorist strike, JDMS: The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology 4, available at http://ssrn.com=abstract=912736.
3. California Economic Development Department, 2008. Special data product request for 2006 fourth-quarter business establishment, employee, and payroll data by ZIP code.
4. Chang, S. E., Pasion, C., Tatebe, K., and Ahmad, R., 2008. Linking Lifeline Infrastructure Performance and Community Disaster Resilience: Models and Multi-Stakeholder Processes, MCEER-08-0004, available at http:==mceer.buffalo.edu=publications=catalog=reports= Linking-Lifeline- Infrastructure-Performance-and-Community-Disaster-Resilience-Modelsand- Multi-Stakeholder-Processes-MCEER-08-0004.html.
5. Dixon, P. B., Lee, B., Muehlenbeck, T., Rimmer, M. T., Rose, A., and Verikios, G., 2010. An H1N1 epidemic in the U.S.: Analysis using a quarterly CGE model, CoPS=Impact Working Paper No. G202, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
6. European Union, 2003. Proceedings of the Joint NEDEIS and University of Twente Workshop: In Search of a Common Methodology for Damage Estimation, Brussels, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2003. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model, HAZUS-MH MR3 Technical Manual, available at http://www.fema.gov=library=viewRecord.do?id=3000 (last accessed 23 July 2010).
8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2008. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology HAZUS-MH MR3 (HAZUS), National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C
9. Gordon, P., Richardson, H., Moore II, J., Park, J., and Kim, S., 2007. Economic impacts of a terrorist attack on the U.S. commercial aviation system, Risk Analysis 27, 505-512. (Pubitemid 47063169)
10. Graf, W., and Seligson, H., 2011. Damage to wood-framed buildings, Earthquake Spectra 27.
11. Grossi, P., 2009. Property damage from the World Trade Center attack, Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy 15, Article 3.
12. Jones, L. M., Bernknopf, R., Cox, D., Goltz, J., Hudnut, K., Mileti, D., Perry, S., Ponti, D., Porter, K., Reichle, M., Seligson, H., Shoaf, K., Treiman, J., and Wein, A., 2008. The ShakeOut Scenario: USGS Open File Report 2008-1150 and California Geological Survey Preliminary Report 25, http://pubs.usgs.gov= of2008=1150 and http://conservation.ca.gov=cgs, Sacramento, CA.
13. Krishnan, S., and Muto, M., 2011. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: Response of tall steel buildings to the ShakeOut Scenario, Earthquake Spectra 27, 375-398.
14. Miller, R., and Blair, P., 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, 782 pp.
15. Minnesota IMPLAN Group (MIG), 2006. Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) System, Stillwater, MN.
16. Multihazard Mitigation Council (MMC), 2005. Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: Independent Study to Assess the Future Benefits of Hazard Mitigation Activities, Study Documentation, Vol. 2, Report to the Federal Emergency Management Agency by the Applied Technology Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.
17. National Research Council, 2005. Improved Seismic Monitoring-Improved Decision-Making: Assessing the Value of Reduced Uncertainty, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
18. Porter, K., 2008. Personal communication.
19. Rose, A., 2004. Economic principles, issues, and research priorities of natural hazard loss Estimation, in Modeling of Spatial Economic Impacts of Natural Hazards, Y. Okuyama and S. Chang (eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
20. Rose, A., 2007. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions, Environmental Hazards 7, 383-398. (Pubitemid 350192358)
21. Rose, A., 2009. A framework for analyzing and estimating the total economic impacts of a terrorist attack and natural disaster, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6, Article 6.
22. Rose, A., and Lim, D., 2002. Business interruption losses from natural hazards: Conceptual and methodology issues in the case of the Northridge earthquake, Environmental Hazards: Human and Social Dimensions 4, 1-14. (Pubitemid 34949516)
23. Rose, A., Oladosu, G., Lee, B., and Beeler-Asay, G., 2009. The economic impacts of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center: A computable general equilibrium analysis, Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy 15, Article 4.
24. Rose, A., Porter, K., Dash, N., Bouabid, J., Huyck, C., Whitehead, J. C., Shaw, D., Eguchi, R. T., Taylor, C., McLane, T. R., Tobin, L. T., Ganderton, P., Godschalk, D., Kiremidjian, A. S., Tierney, K., West, C. T., 2007. Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants, Natural Hazards Review 8, 97-111. (Pubitemid 47588015)
25. Scawthorn, C.R. 2008. Personal communication.
26. Scawthorn, C. R., 2011. Fire Following Earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 27, 419-441.
27. Sherrouse, B., Hester, D., and Wein, A., 2008. Potential Effects of a Scenario Earthquake on the Economy of Southern California: Labor Market Exposure and Sensitivity Analysis to a Magnitude 7.8 Earthquake, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, OFR 2008-1211. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1211/. This publication is online only.
28. Shinozuka, M., Rose, A., and Eguchi, R., 1998. Engineering and Socioeconomic Impacts of Earthquakes: An Analysis of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions in the New Madrid Area, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
29. Swiss Re, 2008. Disaster Losses, http:==www.swissre.com=Search= SearchServlet?q=Disaster6losses&l=any&search=search&search=search
30. Tierney, K., 1997. Impacts of recent disasters on businesses: The 1993 Midwest floods and the 1994 Northridge earthquake, in Economic Consequences of Earthquakes: Preparing for the Unexpected, B. Jones (ed.), National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
31. Wein, A., and Rose, A., 2011. Economic resilience lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario," Earthquake Spectra 27, 559-573.
32. Werner, S. D., Cho, S., Eguchi, R. T., 2008. The ShakeOut Scenario Supplemental Study, Analysis of Risks to Southern California Highway System, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.