Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics cell-dyn sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 939-951

  Tan, Brent T ^a   Nava, Armando J ^a   George, Tracy I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyzer; CBC; Differential; Hematology

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD CELL COUNT; BLOOD SMEAR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ERYTHROCYTE; HEMATOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NUCLEATED RED BLOOD CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; BLOOD CELL COUNT; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES, HOSPITAL; ERYTHROCYTE COUNT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79957687426     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: 19437722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCP1V3UXEIQTSLE     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hedley BD, Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, et al. Initial performance evaluation of the UniCel® DxH 800 Coulter® cellular analysis system. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:45-56.
2. Barnes PW, Eby CS, Shimer G. Blast flagging with the UniCel DxH 800 Coulter Cellular Analysis System. Lab Hematol. 2010;16:23-25.
3. Jean A, Boutet C, Lenormand B, et al. The new haematology analyzer DxH 800: an evaluation of the analytical performances and leucocyte flags, comparison with the LH 755 [published online ahead of print August 17, 2010]. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:138-145. doi:10.1111/j.1751-553X.2010.01257.x.
4. Park Y, Song J, Song S, et al. Evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzer [in Korean]. Korean J Lab Med. 2007;27:162-168.
5. Kang SH, Kim HK, Ham CK, et al. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Int J Lab Hematol. 2008;30:480-486.
6. Muller R, Mellors I, Johannessen B, et al. European multi-center evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn sapphire hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol. 2006;12:15-31.
7. Tan BT, Nava AJ, George TI. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on pediatric and neonatal specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:929-938.
8. ICSH. Guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications. International Council for Standardization in Haematology: prepared by the ICSH Expert Panel on Cytometry. Clin Lab Haematol. 1994;16:157-174.
9. Koepke JA, Van Assendelft OW, Brindza LJ, et al. Reference leukocyte (WBC) differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrumental methods. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007.
10. Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods: application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21:709-720. (Pubitemid 14208512)
11. Segal HC, Briggs C, Kunka S, et al. Accuracy of platelet counting haematology analysers in severe thrombocytopenia and potential impact on platelet transfusion. Br J Haematol. 2005;128:520-525. (Pubitemid 40283171)
12. Harrison P, Ault KA, Chapman S, et al. An interlaboratory study of a candidate reference method for platelet counting. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:448-459. (Pubitemid 33694843)
13. Thompson CB, Diaz DD, Quinn PG, et al. The role of anticoagulation in the measurement of platelet volumes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;80:327-332. (Pubitemid 13048994)
14. Reardon DM, Hutchinson D, Preston FE, et al. The routine measurement of platelet volume: a comparison of aperture-impedance and flow cytometric systems. Clin Lab Haematol. 1985;7:251-257. (Pubitemid 16216622)
15. O'Malley T, Ludlam CA, Fox KA, et al. Measurement of platelet volume using a variety of different anticoagulant and antiplatelet mixtures. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1996;7:431-436. (Pubitemid 26291515)
16. Arroyo ME, Tabernero MD, Garcia-Marcos MA, et al. Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;123:206-214. (Pubitemid 40194081)
17. Harris N, Jou JM, Devoto G, et al. Performance evaluation of the ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer: an international multicenter clinical trial. Lab Hematol. 2005;11:62-70. (Pubitemid 40444034)
18. Langford K, Luchtman-Jones L, Miller R, et al. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000i automated hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol. 2003;9:29-37. (Pubitemid 36411034)
19. Grimaldi E, Scopacasa F. Evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 4000 hematology analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113:497-505. (Pubitemid 30217357)
20. Lesesve JF, Benbih M, Lecompte T. Accurate basophils counting: not an easy goal [letter]! Clin Lab Haematol. 2005;27:143-144. (Pubitemid 40516000)
21. Ruzicka K, Veitl M, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, et al. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:391-396. (Pubitemid 32207178)
22. Johnson M, Samuels C, Jozsa N, et al. Three-way evaluation of high-throughput hematology analyzers: Beckman Coulter LH 750, Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000, and Sysmex XE-2100. Lab Hematol. 2002;8:230-238.
23. Bourner G, Dhaliwal J, Sumner J. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study. Lab Hematol. 2005;11:285-297. (Pubitemid 44262556)