Comparative study between the performance of proactive and reactive mobile ad-hoc networks (MANET) routing protocols with varying mobility

Scientific Research and Essays

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1256-1274

  Said, Samir M ^a   El Emary, Ibrahiem M M ^b   Kadim, Shatha ^c  

^a AL AHLIYYA AMMAN UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c AL BALQA APPLIED UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Destination sequenced distance vector; Index terms ad hoc on demand distance vector; Mobile ad hoc networks; NS 2

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957666043     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19922248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu YC, Jetcheva J (1998). A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Network Routing Protocols. MobiCom,pp. 25-30.
2. Charles EP (2001). Ad-hoc networking. Addison-Wesley.
3. Charles EP, Pravin B (1994). Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers. SIGCOMM 94 -8/94 London England UK.
4. Charles EP Bhagwat P (1994). Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) or Mobile Computers. Comp. Comm. Rev., pp. 234-244.
5. Charles EP, Royer EM, Das SR, Marina MK (2001). Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks. IEEE Personal Commun., pp. 16-28.
6. Charles EP, Das S (2003). Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. Nokia Research Center. RFC 3561. (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt).
7. Chenna R, ChandraSekhar P, Reddy P (2006). Performance Analysis of Adhoc Network Routing Protocols. ISAUHC '06.pp. 186-187
8. Corson S, Macker J (1999). Mobile Ad-hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations. University of Maryland. (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2501.txt)
9. Das SR, Castaneda R, Jiangtao Y, Sengupta R (1998). Comparative performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile, ad-hoc networks. 7th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Networks. pp. 153-161.
10. Das SR, Charles EP, Royer EM (2001). Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks. IEEE Personal Commun. Magazine. Special Issue on Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. 8(1): 16-29.
11. Geetha, Aithal V, Chandra, Sekaran SK (2006). Effect of Mobility over Performance of the Ad-hoc Networks. Ad-hoc and Ubiquitous Computing. 2006 ISAUHC '06. Int. Symposium: pp.138-141. (www.cs.virginia.edu/~cl7v/cs851-papers/dsdv-sigcomm94.pdf)
12. Johnson D, Hu Y, Maltz D (2007). The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks for IPv4. Rice University. Microsoft Research. RFC 4728. (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4728).
13. Johnson D, Maltz D, Jetcheva J (2002). The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. Draft-ietf-manet-dsr-07.txt.
14. Josh B, David AM, David BJ, Yih-Chun H, Jorjeta J (1998). A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocols. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM MOBICOM: pp. 85-97.
15. Lakshmikanth, Gaiwak G, Vyavahare MA (2008). Simulation based comparative performance analysis of adhoc routing protocols. 10 Conference TENCON: pp.1-5.
16. Mahdipour E, Aminian E, Torabi M, Zare M (2009). CBR Performance Evaluation over AODV and DSDV in RW Mobility Model. ICCAE '09. Int. Conf., 238-242.
17. Mbarushimana C, Shahrabi (2007). Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols Performance in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. AINAW'07.21st Int. Conf. 2: 679-684.
18. Talooki, Ziarati VNK (2006). Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. APCC '06: pp.1-5.