Individual fit-testing of earplugs: A review of uses

Noise and Health

Volumn 13, Issue 51, 2011, Pages 152-162

  Schulz, Theresa Y ^a,b  

^a Sperian Hearing Protection LLC   (United States)

^b Howard Leight Industries   (United States)

Author keywords

Attenuation; earplugs; fit test; hearing protection; protected exposure

Indexed keywords

AUDIOMETRY; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; NOISE INJURY; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PROSTHESIS; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; REVIEW;

AUDIOMETRY; EAR PROTECTIVE DEVICES; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 79957665184     PISSN: 14631741     EISSN: 19984030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.77216     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. EPA. Noise labeling requirements for hearing protectors. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; Fed. Regist. 44(190), 40CFR Part 211; 1979;56:130-56, 147.
2. Sound Source. San Diego (CA): "Understanding Ratings" c2005. Available from: http://www.howardleight.com/images/pdf/0000/0254/Sound-Source- 1a-UnderstandRatings.pdf [last cited on 2009 Dec. 1].
3. EPA. Product Noise Labeling Hearing Protection Devices; Proposed Rule. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; Fed Regist 74(149), 40CFR Part 211; 2009. p. 39150-96.
4. Berger EH, Franks JR, Lindgren F. International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation. In: Axelsson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom PA, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, editors. Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Thieme; 1996. p. 361-7.
5. Royster JD, Berger EH, Merry CJ, Nixon CW, Franks JR, Behar A, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1506.
6. Murphy WJ, Franks JR, Berger EH, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon-Ernst C, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: Sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:311-23. (Pubitemid 38112435)
7. Berger EH, Franks JR, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon-Ernst C, Kieper RW, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:665-72. (Pubitemid 28087534)
8. American National Standard Institute (ANSI). Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors, American National Standards Institute, S12.6-1997 (R2008), New York, NY.
9. International Organization of Standardization (ISO). "Acoustics - Hearing Protectors - Part 1: Subjective Method for the Measurement of Sound Attenuation", International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4869-1:1990 (E), Switzerland.
10. Vermiglio A. HLI Study Review v. 3. Unpublished laboratory report, House Ear Institute, los Angeles, CA, 2005. p. 40..
11. Soli S, Vermiglio A, Larson V. A system for assessing the fit of hearing protectors in the field. Presentation at the National Hearing Conservation Association Conference, February, 2005, Tucson, AZ.
12. Larson V. VeriPRO® and ANSI S12.6 REAT Results in the Laboratory. Copies of the unpublished studies are available on request from Howard Leight by SPERIAN. Available from: http://www.howardleight.com/[last cited 2011 Feb. 4].
13. Kotarbinska E. Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Radioelectronics, 7.6.2009. [Personal communication].
14. Voix J, Hager LD, Zeidan J. Experimental validation of the objective measurement of individual earplug field performance. Presented at EuroNoise 2006, Tampere, Finland. Available from:. http://gator1127. hostgator.com/ ~sonomax/assets/files/pdf/sonomax-EuroNOISE.pdf [last retrieved on 2011 Feb. 4].
15. OSHA/NHCA/NIOSH Alliance, Best Practice Bulletin: Hearing Protection-Emerging Trends: Individual Fit Testing, (2008). Available from: http://www.hearingconservation.org/as-allianceNHCA-OSHA.html [last retrieved on 2009 Jun. 13]
16. Berger EH, Voix J, Kieper R. Methods of developing and validating a field-MIRE approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation, presented at National Hearing Conservation Association Conference, Savannah, GA: 2007.
17. Hager LD. Hearing Protectors 2009: Rating, Evaluation and the NRR. EHS Today, cJune 2009. Available from: http://www.ehstoday.com/ppe/hearing- protection/hearing-protectors-rating-9950/[last cited on 2009 Jul. 24].
18. Witt B (a). Fit-Testing of Hearing Protection, Occupational Health and Safety. 2007;76:1. Available from: http://www.ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/10/ Fit-Testing-of-Hearing-Protectors.aspx [last cited on 2009 Jul. 23].
19. Witt B (b). Putting the Personal Back into PPE: Hearing Protector Effectiveness, Occupational Health and Safety. 2007;76:90-4. [about 2 p.] Available from: http://www.ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/06/Putting-the-Personal- Back-into-PPE-Hearing-Protector-Effectiveness.aspx [last cited on 2009 Jul. 23].
20. Voix J, Hager LD. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2009;15:211-9.
21. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Harris DA, Johnson JL, Shaw PB. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 2003;64:501-9. (Pubitemid 37010814)
22. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Hearing protectors - recommendations for selection, use, care and maintenance - guidance document (Standard No. en 458:2004). Brussels, Belgium: CEN; 2004.
23. Michael K, Bloyer C. Hearing protector attenuation measurement on the end-user. Presented at the National Hearing Conservation Association Annual Conference in Atlanta, GA 2007. Available from: http://www.michaelassociates.com (Products>FitCheck>Presentations>NH CA1999) [last cited on 2009 Nov. 3].
24. Joseph A, Punch J, Stephenson M, Paneth N, Wolfe E, Murphy W. The effects of training format on earplug performance. Int J Audiol 2007;46:609-18. (Pubitemid 47542229)
25. Hager L. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protectors: A Case Study. Presented at American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Expo in Minneapolis, MN 2008; [personal communication].
26. Tsukada T, Sakakibara H. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenaution effect of wearing earplugs. Ind Health 2008;46:393-6.
27. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protectors among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005;2:227-38. (Pubitemid 40594039)
28. Zohar D, Cohen A, Azar N. Promoting increased use of ear protectors in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors 1980;22:69-79. (Pubitemid 10041337)
29. Schulz TY, Bessette RS. Training workers to recognize a good hearing protector fit, Unpublished pilot study. (2009).
30. Owens P. Evaluating ear plug attenuation in a petroleum refinery using a portable audiometer. Presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Expo in Toronto, ON 2009; [personal communication].
31. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2005). "Advanced Hearing Protector Study, Flint Metal Center" (EPHB Report 312-11a). Cincinnati, OH: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.