A philosopher's reflections on the discovery of mirror neurons

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 570-595

  Jacob, Pierre ^a  

^a INSTITUT JEAN NICOD   (France)

Author keywords

Action mirroring; Embodied cognition; Simulation; Third person mindreading; Tuning fork model of social cognition; Understanding goal directed action

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COGNITION; HAND STRENGTH; HAPLORHINI; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MIRROR NEURON; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COGNITION; HAND STRENGTH; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; INTENTION; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MIRROR NEURONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 79957630091     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01040.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 267-278.
2. Borg, E. (2007). If mirror neurons are the answer, what was the question? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 5-19.
3. Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S., & Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: Inferential processes versus action simulation. Current Biology, 17(24), 2117-2121.
4. Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, C. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 114-126.
5. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249.
6. Carman, T. & Hansen, M. B. N. (Eds.) (2005). The Cambridge companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Costantini, M., Galati, G., Ferretti, A., Caulo, M., Tartaro, A., Romani, G. L., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Neural systems underlying observation of humanly impossible movements. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1761-1767.
10. Csibra, G. (2005). Mirror neurons or emulator neurons? Available at: Accessed on June 8, 2009.
11. Csibra, G. (2007). Action mirroring and action understanding. In P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, & M. Kawato (Eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Attention and performance XXII (pp. 435-459). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Csibra, G., Biró, S., Koós, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27, 111-133.
13. Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
14. Ferrari, P. F., Rozzi, S., & Fogassi, L. (2005). Mirror neurons responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1703-1714.
15. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
16. Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662-667.
17. Gallese, V. (2001). The "shared manifold" hypothesis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 33-50.
18. Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 517-528.
19. Gallese, V. (2004). Intentional attunement. The mirror neuron system and its role in interpersonal relations. Available at: Accessed on June 8, 2009.
20. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mindreading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 493-501.
21. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396-403.
22. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning about actions: The naïve theory of rational actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287-292.
24. Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.
25. Goldman, A. (2004). Mirror systems. Social understanding and social cognition. Available at: Accessed on June 8, 2009.
26. Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds, the philosophy, psychology and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27. Goldman, A. (2009a). Mirroring, mindreading and simulation. In J. A. Pineda (Ed.), Mirror neuron system: The role of mirroring processes in social cognition. New York: Humana Press.
28. Goldman, A. (2009b). Jacob on mirroring, simulating and mindreading. Mind and Language, 24(2), 235-252.
29. Goldman, A., & De Vignemont, F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 154-159.
30. Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3, 529-535.
31. Jacob, P. (1997). What minds can do. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Jacob, P. (2005). Grasping and perceiving objects. In A. Brook & K. Akins (Eds.), Cognition, and the brain, the philosophy and neuroscience movement (pp. 241-283). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Jacob, P. (2008). What do mirror neurons contribute to human social cognition? Mind and Language, 23(2), 190-223.
34. Jacob, P., & De Vignemont, F. (in press). Spatial coordinates and phenomenology in the two-visual systems model. In N. Gangopadhyay (Ed.), Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two-visual systems. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35. Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2003). Ways of seeing: The scope and limits of visual cognition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain. Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
37. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
38. Jeannerod, M. (2004). Is simulation a good way of communicating? Available at: Accessed on June 8, 2009.
39. Jeannerod, M., & Jacob, P. (2005). A new look at the two-visual systems. Neuropsychologia, 43, 301-312.
40. Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 501-507.
41. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). La Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
42. Milner, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43. Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255-258. (April 2005).
44. Pacherie, E. (2000). The content of intentions. Mind and Language, 15(4), 400-432.
45. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
46. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2000). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping and action recognition: A new view on the cortical motor functions. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 539-552). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Review of Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
48. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping, action understanding, and imitation. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 427-440). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain. How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
50. Romani, M., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., Facchini, S., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Motor facilitation of the human cortical-spino system during observation of bio-mechanically. NeuroImage, 26, 755-763.
51. Saxe, R. (2005). Tuning forks in the mind: Reply to Goldman and Sebanz. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 321.
52. Schubotz, R., & Von Cramon, Y. (2004). Sequences of abstract nonbiological stimuli share ventral premotor cortex with action observation and imagery. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(24), 5467-5474.
53. Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. Cognition, 96, B1-B11.
55. Southgate, V., Johnson, M. H., & Csibra, G. (2008). Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions. Cognition, 107, 1059-1069.
56. Sperber, D. (2004). "Mirror neurons" or "concept neurons"? Available at: Accessed on June 8, 2009.
57. Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18(7), 580-586.
58. Umiltà, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). "I know what you are doing": A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 32, 91-101.
59. Ungerleider, L., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209-216.
62. Wood, J., Glynn, D., & Hauser, M. (2007). The uniquely human capacity to throw evolved from a non-throwing primate: An evolutionary dissociation between action and perception. Biology Letters, 3, 360-364.
63. Wood, J., Glynn, D. D., Philips, B. C., & Hauser, M. (2007). The perception of rational, goal-directed action in non-human primates. Science, 317, 1404-1405.
64. Wood, J. N., & Hauser, M. (2008). Action comprehension in non-human primates: Motor simulation or inferential reasoning? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 461-465.