Development and calibration of an item bank for PE metrics assessments: Standard 1

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 119-137

  Fox, Connie ^a   Zhu, Weimo ^b   Park, Youngsik ^c   Fisette, Jennifer L ^d   Graber, Kim C ^b   Dyson, Ben ^e   Avery, Marybell ^f   Franck, Marian ^g   Placek, Judith H ^h   Rink, Judy ⁱ   Raynes, De ^j  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE   (United States)

^d KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^f Lincoln Nebraska Public Schools ^*  (United States)

^g School District of Lancaster   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^j National Association of Sport and Physical Education   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

item response theory; Rasch analysis; test construction; test equating

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BASKETBALL; CALIBRATION; DANCING; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOGGING; JUMPING; KINDERGARTEN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; METRIC SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; RASCH ANALYSIS; RUNNING; SPORT; STUDENT; TRAINING; VIDEOTAPE;

EID: 79957624335     PISSN: 1091367X     EISSN: 15327841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2011.568366     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baker, F. B. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their application to test development. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 12, 38-47.
3. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer- Nijhoff Publishing.
4. Kulinna, P. H., & Zhu,W. (2001). Fitness portfolio calibration for first- through sixth-grade children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 324-334. (Pubitemid 33604388)
5. Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-faceted Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
6. Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transaction, 16, 878. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://rasch.org/rmt/rmt162f.htm
7. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2004). Moving into the future: National standards for physical education (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
8. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2008). PE Metrics: Assessing the national standards. Standard 1: Elementary. Reston, VA: Author.
9. Safrit, M. J. (1989). Criterion-referenced measurement: Validity. In M. J. Safrit & T. M. Wood (Eds.), Measurement concepts in physical education and exercise science (pp. 119-135). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
10. Safrit, M. J., Cohen, A. S., & Costa, M. G. (1989). Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 235-235.
11. Spray, J. A. (1987). Recent developments in measurement and possible applications to the measurements of psychomotor behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 203-209.
12. Zhu, W. (1996). Should total scores from a rating scale be directly used? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 363-372. (Pubitemid 126421742)
13. Zhu, W. (1998). Test equating: What, why, how? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 11-23.
14. Zhu, W. (2006). Constructing tests using item response theory. In T. Wood & W. Zhu (Eds.), Measurement theory and practice in kinesiology (pp. 53-76). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
15. Zhu, W., & Cole, E. L. (1996). Many-faceted Rasch calibration of a gross motor instrument. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 24-34. (Pubitemid 126421703)
16. Zhu, W., Timm, G., & Ainsworth, B. (2001). Rasch calibration and optimal categorization of an instrument measuring women's exercise perseverance and barriers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 104-116. (Pubitemid 33604376)